Beyond Theory: Leveraging Business Intelligence Tools to Uncover Actionable Pathways for Mapping the Intention–Behavior Gap in Behavioral Sciences

IF 3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohammad Alhur, Ahmad N. Abudoush, Raed Alqirem, Mohamed M. Mostafa
{"title":"Beyond Theory: Leveraging Business Intelligence Tools to Uncover Actionable Pathways for Mapping the Intention–Behavior Gap in Behavioral Sciences","authors":"Mohammad Alhur,&nbsp;Ahmad N. Abudoush,&nbsp;Raed Alqirem,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Mostafa","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/5224549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavioral science confronts the issue of how people’s behaviors differ from what they intend to do. However, current models, such as the theory of planned behavior, are insufficient to account for contextual influences and interdisciplinary effects, especially in the case of modern social phenomena. The majority of studies concentrate on single domains (e.g., health and consumer behavior) and employ manual coding schemes, overlooking essential thematic relationships. This research highlights the necessity for integrative frameworks that attempt to analyze why intentions fail to be realized in complex settings such as climate change and digitalization. The primary objectives of this research are to identify and operate dominant and emerging thematic trends in intention–behavior literature in a time series from 1979 to 2025 and to analyze and investigate the effects of publication index status and citation patterns on scholarly impact. This study uses structural topic modeling (STM) alongside bibliometric analyses to identify themes and correlations in intention–behavior research. STM employs generalized linear models to include document-level metadata, allowing for the discovery of related topics and the key factors influencing the development of the literature. Data collection was initially performed on February 20, 2025, through the Web of Science database, using studies that were identified following PRISMA guidelines, reviewed, and considered relevant. The initial records numbered 5350. Significant thematic trends were found to define, and key psychological mechanisms to explain the intention–behavior gap were identified. The study also found that the determinants of publication index status and citation trends play important roles in establishing the discipline’s fate and the impact of intention–behavior literature. Based on these findings, the study highlights how strong thematic links in intention–behavior research can inform cross-domain interventions—such as integrating physical activity and organic food campaigns or leveraging sustainable tourism to promote ethical consumption—by targeting shared psychological drivers like health identity and self-image. In future research, the intention–behavior gap should be investigated across different disciplines and contexts and with longitudinal and experimental designs to take advantage of the psychological and contextual factors that affect behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/5224549","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/5224549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral science confronts the issue of how people’s behaviors differ from what they intend to do. However, current models, such as the theory of planned behavior, are insufficient to account for contextual influences and interdisciplinary effects, especially in the case of modern social phenomena. The majority of studies concentrate on single domains (e.g., health and consumer behavior) and employ manual coding schemes, overlooking essential thematic relationships. This research highlights the necessity for integrative frameworks that attempt to analyze why intentions fail to be realized in complex settings such as climate change and digitalization. The primary objectives of this research are to identify and operate dominant and emerging thematic trends in intention–behavior literature in a time series from 1979 to 2025 and to analyze and investigate the effects of publication index status and citation patterns on scholarly impact. This study uses structural topic modeling (STM) alongside bibliometric analyses to identify themes and correlations in intention–behavior research. STM employs generalized linear models to include document-level metadata, allowing for the discovery of related topics and the key factors influencing the development of the literature. Data collection was initially performed on February 20, 2025, through the Web of Science database, using studies that were identified following PRISMA guidelines, reviewed, and considered relevant. The initial records numbered 5350. Significant thematic trends were found to define, and key psychological mechanisms to explain the intention–behavior gap were identified. The study also found that the determinants of publication index status and citation trends play important roles in establishing the discipline’s fate and the impact of intention–behavior literature. Based on these findings, the study highlights how strong thematic links in intention–behavior research can inform cross-domain interventions—such as integrating physical activity and organic food campaigns or leveraging sustainable tourism to promote ethical consumption—by targeting shared psychological drivers like health identity and self-image. In future research, the intention–behavior gap should be investigated across different disciplines and contexts and with longitudinal and experimental designs to take advantage of the psychological and contextual factors that affect behavior.

Abstract Image

超越理论:利用商业智能工具揭示行为科学中意向-行为差距的可操作路径
行为科学面对的问题是人们的行为与他们的意图是如何不同的。然而,目前的模型,如计划行为理论,不足以解释背景影响和跨学科效应,特别是在现代社会现象的情况下。大多数研究集中在单一领域(例如,健康和消费者行为),并采用手工编码方案,忽略了基本的主题关系。这项研究强调了建立综合框架的必要性,这些框架试图分析在气候变化和数字化等复杂环境中意图未能实现的原因。本研究的主要目标是识别和操作1979年至2025年时间序列中意向-行为文献的主导和新兴主题趋势,并分析和调查出版物索引状态和引用模式对学术影响的影响。本研究使用结构主题模型(STM)和文献计量学分析来识别意图-行为研究中的主题和相关性。STM采用广义线性模型来包含文档级元数据,允许发现相关主题和影响文献发展的关键因素。数据收集最初于2025年2月20日进行,通过Web of Science数据库,使用遵循PRISMA指南,审查并认为相关的研究。初始记录编号为5350。发现了显著的主题趋势,并确定了解释意向-行为差距的关键心理机制。研究还发现,出版索引地位和被引趋势的决定因素在决定学科命运和意向行为文献影响方面发挥着重要作用。基于这些发现,该研究强调了意向-行为研究中强有力的主题联系是如何通过针对共同的心理驱动因素(如健康认同和自我形象),为跨领域干预提供信息的——比如整合体育活动和有机食品活动,或者利用可持续旅游来促进道德消费。在未来的研究中,意向-行为差距应跨学科、跨情境进行研究,并采用纵向和实验设计,以利用影响行为的心理和情境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信