Traditional Versus Contemporary Models for Identifying Causes of Maternal Death: A Population-Based Study

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yasser Sabr, Sarka Lisonkova, Amélie Boutin, Chantal Mayer, K. S. Joseph
{"title":"Traditional Versus Contemporary Models for Identifying Causes of Maternal Death: A Population-Based Study","authors":"Yasser Sabr,&nbsp;Sarka Lisonkova,&nbsp;Amélie Boutin,&nbsp;Chantal Mayer,&nbsp;K. S. Joseph","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine differences in cause-of-maternal-death assignment based on underlying versus multiple causes of death.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional, population-based study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>United States, 1999–2002 and 2018–2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>1633 maternal deaths in 1999–2002 and 1929 maternal deaths in 2018–2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Causes of death were identified based on the underlying cause of death and also based on multiple causes of death. The frequency of six selected obstetrical causes of death was quantified and ranked.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pre-eclampsia (0.87 per 100 000 live births, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–1.02) was the most common cause of maternal death in 2018–2022, when cause-of-death assignment was based on the underlying cause of death. Amniotic fluid embolism and cardiomyopathy tied for second rank, haemorrhage placed fourth and puerperal sepsis and uterine rupture tied for the fifth rank. Rankings based on multiple causes of death showed a different pattern: haemorrhage (1.13 per 100 000 live births, 95% CI 0.98–1.29) was the most common cause, followed by pre-eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, amniotic fluid embolism, puerperal sepsis and uterine rupture. There was no significant correlation between the cause-of-maternal death rankings based on the underlying and multiple causes of death (correlation coefficient 0.62, 95% CI-0.39, 0.95; <i>p</i> value 0.19) in 2018–2022. Cause-of-death rankings were significantly correlated under the two methods of cause-of-death assignment in 1999–2002 (correlation coefficient 0.83, 95% CI 0.05, 0.98; <i>p</i> value 0.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Basing cause-of-death assignment and ranking of the causes of maternal death using a multiple causes-of-death approach may better inform clinical and public health priorities for reducing maternal mortality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 11","pages":"1689-1696"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18298","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine differences in cause-of-maternal-death assignment based on underlying versus multiple causes of death.

Design

Cross-sectional, population-based study.

Setting

United States, 1999–2002 and 2018–2022.

Population

1633 maternal deaths in 1999–2002 and 1929 maternal deaths in 2018–2022.

Methods

Causes of death were identified based on the underlying cause of death and also based on multiple causes of death. The frequency of six selected obstetrical causes of death was quantified and ranked.

Results

Pre-eclampsia (0.87 per 100 000 live births, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–1.02) was the most common cause of maternal death in 2018–2022, when cause-of-death assignment was based on the underlying cause of death. Amniotic fluid embolism and cardiomyopathy tied for second rank, haemorrhage placed fourth and puerperal sepsis and uterine rupture tied for the fifth rank. Rankings based on multiple causes of death showed a different pattern: haemorrhage (1.13 per 100 000 live births, 95% CI 0.98–1.29) was the most common cause, followed by pre-eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, amniotic fluid embolism, puerperal sepsis and uterine rupture. There was no significant correlation between the cause-of-maternal death rankings based on the underlying and multiple causes of death (correlation coefficient 0.62, 95% CI-0.39, 0.95; p value 0.19) in 2018–2022. Cause-of-death rankings were significantly correlated under the two methods of cause-of-death assignment in 1999–2002 (correlation coefficient 0.83, 95% CI 0.05, 0.98; p value 0.04).

Conclusion

Basing cause-of-death assignment and ranking of the causes of maternal death using a multiple causes-of-death approach may better inform clinical and public health priorities for reducing maternal mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

确定产妇死亡原因的传统模型与现代模型:一项基于人口的研究
目的探讨基于潜在死亡原因和多种死亡原因的产妇死亡原因分配的差异。设计:横断面、基于人群的研究。美国,1999-2002年和2018-2022年。1999-2002年孕产妇死亡1633人,2018-2022年孕产妇死亡1929人。方法根据潜在死亡原因和多重死亡原因确定死亡原因。对选定的6种产科死亡原因的频率进行了量化和排序。结果子痫(0.87 / 10万活产,95%可信区间[CI] 0.74-1.02)是2018-2022年孕产妇死亡的最常见原因,死亡原因分配基于潜在死亡原因。羊水栓塞和心肌病并列第二,出血并列第四,产褥期败血症和子宫破裂并列第五。基于多种死亡原因的排名显示出不同的模式:出血(每10万活产1.13例,95% CI 0.98-1.29)是最常见的原因,其次是先兆子痫、心肌病、羊水栓塞、产后败血症和子宫破裂。基于潜在死亡原因和多种死亡原因的产妇死亡原因排名之间没有显著相关性(相关系数0.62,95% CI‐0.39,0.95;P值0.19)。1999-2002年两种死因分配方法下的死因排序显著相关(相关系数0.83,95% CI 0.05, 0.98;P值0.04)。结论采用多死因方法对孕产妇死亡原因进行死因分配和排序,可以更好地为降低孕产妇死亡率的临床和公共卫生优先事项提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信