Evaluating the role of clinical decision support systems in medication safety for older people: a systematic review

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yaoyi Ng, Jovan Teng Yuan Hsu, Noelle Na En Ng, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Jolene Li Jun Hsu, Farisah Sulaimi, Hiang Khoon Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Qin Xiang Ng
{"title":"Evaluating the role of clinical decision support systems in medication safety for older people: a systematic review","authors":"Yaoyi Ng, Jovan Teng Yuan Hsu, Noelle Na En Ng, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Jolene Li Jun Hsu, Farisah Sulaimi, Hiang Khoon Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Qin Xiang Ng","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Older people are particularly vulnerable to medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) due to polypharmacy and age-related physiological changes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) presents itself as a potential solution for clinicians, but their effectiveness in care for older people remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the impact of CDSS on reducing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and improving medication safety amongst older people. Design and Setting This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CDSS interventions in older populations (aged 65 or older). Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing CDSS in reducing PIM use and ADEs amongst older people. Data on medication safety outcomes (PIM, deprescription and ADEs) were extracted. The findings were narratively synthesized, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool was also applied. Results A total of 16 RCTs (comprising 135,108 participants) were included. CDSS significantly reduced PIM initiation by up to 18% (moderate certainty) and improved deprescription rates, with intervention groups achieving 55.4% PIM discontinuation. However, CDSS had inconsistent effects on ADEs (low certainty). Conclusions CDSS improved prescribing practices by reducing inappropriate medication use in older people. However, its impact on ADEs was less evident. Implementation challenges such as clinician adherence, alert fatigue and system usability must be addressed to optimize CDSS effectiveness in care for older people. Further research is needed for long-term evaluation and refinement of CDSS.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Older people are particularly vulnerable to medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) due to polypharmacy and age-related physiological changes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) presents itself as a potential solution for clinicians, but their effectiveness in care for older people remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the impact of CDSS on reducing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and improving medication safety amongst older people. Design and Setting This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CDSS interventions in older populations (aged 65 or older). Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing CDSS in reducing PIM use and ADEs amongst older people. Data on medication safety outcomes (PIM, deprescription and ADEs) were extracted. The findings were narratively synthesized, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool was also applied. Results A total of 16 RCTs (comprising 135,108 participants) were included. CDSS significantly reduced PIM initiation by up to 18% (moderate certainty) and improved deprescription rates, with intervention groups achieving 55.4% PIM discontinuation. However, CDSS had inconsistent effects on ADEs (low certainty). Conclusions CDSS improved prescribing practices by reducing inappropriate medication use in older people. However, its impact on ADEs was less evident. Implementation challenges such as clinician adherence, alert fatigue and system usability must be addressed to optimize CDSS effectiveness in care for older people. Further research is needed for long-term evaluation and refinement of CDSS.
评价临床决策支持系统在老年人用药安全中的作用:一项系统综述
背景由于多种药物作用和年龄相关的生理变化,老年人特别容易发生用药错误和药物不良事件(ADEs)。临床决策支持系统(CDSS)为临床医生提供了一种潜在的解决方案,但其在老年人护理中的有效性仍不确定。目的评价CDSS在减少潜在不适当用药(PIMs)和提高老年人用药安全性方面的影响。这是一项评估老年人群(65岁及以上)CDSS干预措施的随机对照试验(rct)的系统综述。方法综合检索OVID Medline、Embase和Cochrane Library自成立至2025年4月的文献。符合条件的研究是评估CDSS在减少老年人PIM使用和ade方面的作用的随机对照试验。提取药物安全性结局(PIM、去处方和ADEs)数据。对研究结果进行叙述性综合,并使用GRADE框架评估证据的确定性。Cochrane风险偏倚2工具也被应用。结果共纳入16项随机对照试验(共135,108名受试者)。CDSS显著降低PIM起始率高达18%(中等确定性),改善去处方率,干预组PIM终止率达到55.4%。然而,CDSS对ADEs的影响不一致(低确定性)。结论:CDSS通过减少老年人不当用药改善了处方实践。然而,它对ade的影响不太明显。必须解决诸如临床医生依从性、警惕疲劳和系统可用性等实施挑战,以优化CDSS在老年人护理中的有效性。对CDSS的长期评价和完善需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信