Yaoyi Ng, Jovan Teng Yuan Hsu, Noelle Na En Ng, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Jolene Li Jun Hsu, Farisah Sulaimi, Hiang Khoon Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Qin Xiang Ng
{"title":"Evaluating the role of clinical decision support systems in medication safety for older people: a systematic review","authors":"Yaoyi Ng, Jovan Teng Yuan Hsu, Noelle Na En Ng, Joel Zuo Er Ong, Jolene Li Jun Hsu, Farisah Sulaimi, Hiang Khoon Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Qin Xiang Ng","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Older people are particularly vulnerable to medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) due to polypharmacy and age-related physiological changes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) presents itself as a potential solution for clinicians, but their effectiveness in care for older people remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the impact of CDSS on reducing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and improving medication safety amongst older people. Design and Setting This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CDSS interventions in older populations (aged 65 or older). Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing CDSS in reducing PIM use and ADEs amongst older people. Data on medication safety outcomes (PIM, deprescription and ADEs) were extracted. The findings were narratively synthesized, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool was also applied. Results A total of 16 RCTs (comprising 135,108 participants) were included. CDSS significantly reduced PIM initiation by up to 18% (moderate certainty) and improved deprescription rates, with intervention groups achieving 55.4% PIM discontinuation. However, CDSS had inconsistent effects on ADEs (low certainty). Conclusions CDSS improved prescribing practices by reducing inappropriate medication use in older people. However, its impact on ADEs was less evident. Implementation challenges such as clinician adherence, alert fatigue and system usability must be addressed to optimize CDSS effectiveness in care for older people. Further research is needed for long-term evaluation and refinement of CDSS.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Older people are particularly vulnerable to medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) due to polypharmacy and age-related physiological changes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) presents itself as a potential solution for clinicians, but their effectiveness in care for older people remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the impact of CDSS on reducing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and improving medication safety amongst older people. Design and Setting This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CDSS interventions in older populations (aged 65 or older). Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing CDSS in reducing PIM use and ADEs amongst older people. Data on medication safety outcomes (PIM, deprescription and ADEs) were extracted. The findings were narratively synthesized, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool was also applied. Results A total of 16 RCTs (comprising 135,108 participants) were included. CDSS significantly reduced PIM initiation by up to 18% (moderate certainty) and improved deprescription rates, with intervention groups achieving 55.4% PIM discontinuation. However, CDSS had inconsistent effects on ADEs (low certainty). Conclusions CDSS improved prescribing practices by reducing inappropriate medication use in older people. However, its impact on ADEs was less evident. Implementation challenges such as clinician adherence, alert fatigue and system usability must be addressed to optimize CDSS effectiveness in care for older people. Further research is needed for long-term evaluation and refinement of CDSS.
期刊介绍:
Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.