A Quantitative Tool for Culling Collections of Human Specimens; Proof of Concept.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学
Imane El Idrissi, Valentine Piquard, Warren Fransman, Emmanuel Roux, Clemence Mauriac, Mariana L Ferrari, Emilie Alirol, Fay Betsou
{"title":"A Quantitative Tool for Culling Collections of Human Specimens; Proof of Concept.","authors":"Imane El Idrissi, Valentine Piquard, Warren Fransman, Emmanuel Roux, Clemence Mauriac, Mariana L Ferrari, Emilie Alirol, Fay Betsou","doi":"10.1177/19475535251362092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Biobanks of specimens of human origin have accumulated millions of specimens. Their storage is costly, while many of them may not be useful and should be culled. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Our objective was to develop, pilot test, and evaluate a quantitative culling tool. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We developed a culling tool based on a series of parameters with a quantitative score attributed to each. The parameters of the culling tool correspond to different aspects of the value of collections, such as the richness of the associated data, the types of samples, their conservation mode, and regulatory constraints. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The culling tool was adapted and independently applied by the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics and the Biological Resource Center of Institut Pasteur biobanks. The cumulative final score supported evidence-based and standardized decision-making. A \"diagnostic\" threshold could be established for the \"diagnosis\" of collections of low value. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The culling tool is an algorithm developed to assess the value of legacy collections of biological resources of human origin and help establish culling plans. Biobanks can use this culling tool when they periodically assess the value of stored collections and need to decide or advise to cull them, and also when deciding whether to accept requests to host new collections previously stored elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":55358,"journal":{"name":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19475535251362092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biobanks of specimens of human origin have accumulated millions of specimens. Their storage is costly, while many of them may not be useful and should be culled. Objectives: Our objective was to develop, pilot test, and evaluate a quantitative culling tool. Methods: We developed a culling tool based on a series of parameters with a quantitative score attributed to each. The parameters of the culling tool correspond to different aspects of the value of collections, such as the richness of the associated data, the types of samples, their conservation mode, and regulatory constraints. Results: The culling tool was adapted and independently applied by the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics and the Biological Resource Center of Institut Pasteur biobanks. The cumulative final score supported evidence-based and standardized decision-making. A "diagnostic" threshold could be established for the "diagnosis" of collections of low value. Conclusion: The culling tool is an algorithm developed to assess the value of legacy collections of biological resources of human origin and help establish culling plans. Biobanks can use this culling tool when they periodically assess the value of stored collections and need to decide or advise to cull them, and also when deciding whether to accept requests to host new collections previously stored elsewhere.

人类标本采集的定量筛选工具概念验证。
人类起源标本生物库已积累了数以百万计的标本。它们的储存成本很高,而其中许多可能没有用处,应该被淘汰。目的:我们的目标是开发、试点测试和评估一种定量筛选工具。方法:我们开发了一个基于一系列参数的筛选工具,每个参数都有一个定量评分。筛选工具的参数对应于收集值的不同方面,例如相关数据的丰富程度、样本类型、它们的保存模式和监管约束。结果:该筛选工具被创新诊断基金会和巴斯德生物银行生物资源中心独立应用。累积最终得分支持循证和标准化决策。可以为“诊断”低价值的集合建立一个“诊断”阈值。结论:该筛选工具是一种用于评估人类起源生物资源遗留馆藏价值并帮助制定筛选计划的算法。当生物银行定期评估存储的集合的价值并需要决定或建议进行筛选时,以及决定是否接受接收以前存储在其他地方的新集合的请求时,可以使用该筛选工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Biopreservation and Biobanking Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Biopreservation and Biobanking is the first journal to provide a unifying forum for the peer-reviewed communication of recent advances in the emerging and evolving field of biospecimen procurement, processing, preservation and banking, distribution, and use. The Journal publishes a range of original articles focusing on current challenges and problems in biopreservation, and advances in methods to address these issues related to the processing of macromolecules, cells, and tissues for research. In a new section dedicated to Emerging Markets and Technologies, the Journal highlights the emergence of new markets and technologies that are either adopting or disrupting the biobank framework as they imprint on society. The solutions presented here are anticipated to help drive innovation within the biobank community. Biopreservation and Biobanking also explores the ethical, legal, and societal considerations surrounding biobanking and biorepository operation. Ideas and practical solutions relevant to improved quality, efficiency, and sustainability of repositories, and relating to their management, operation and oversight are discussed as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信