Impact of the Dexamethasone Implant on Slowing Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: Post Hoc Analysis of the MEAD Study.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kevin J Blinder, Charles C Wykoff, Joseph R Ferencz, Justis P Ehlers, Yixin Fang, Hongxin Lai, Miller Ogidigben, Francisco J López
{"title":"Impact of the Dexamethasone Implant on Slowing Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: Post Hoc Analysis of the MEAD Study.","authors":"Kevin J Blinder, Charles C Wykoff, Joseph R Ferencz, Justis P Ehlers, Yixin Fang, Hongxin Lai, Miller Ogidigben, Francisco J López","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) treatment on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores and disease progression in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 3-year, randomized, phase 3 MEAD study evaluated DEX 0.35 and 0.7 mg versus sham (treatment at ≥6-month intervals) in patients with DME. This post hoc analysis used data from the sham and pooled DEX arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement was significantly higher after DEX treatment compared with sham at 24 months only (8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016). Among those with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, the time to first ≥2-step improvement was shorter with DEX (P<0.001; median 400 days with DEX versus 713 with sham). There were no significant differences between the DEX and sham groups in the proportion of patients who progressed from non-proliferative to proliferative DR, but among those who progressed, the time to progression was lengthened with DEX (P<0.001; median 531.1 days with DEX versus 191 with sham).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This post hoc analysis of MEAD study data showed that DEX treatment may potentially have a positive impact on DR by reducing disease severity and slowing progression in DR patients with central DME.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) treatment on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores and disease progression in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: The 3-year, randomized, phase 3 MEAD study evaluated DEX 0.35 and 0.7 mg versus sham (treatment at ≥6-month intervals) in patients with DME. This post hoc analysis used data from the sham and pooled DEX arms.

Results: The proportion of patients with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement was significantly higher after DEX treatment compared with sham at 24 months only (8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016). Among those with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, the time to first ≥2-step improvement was shorter with DEX (P<0.001; median 400 days with DEX versus 713 with sham). There were no significant differences between the DEX and sham groups in the proportion of patients who progressed from non-proliferative to proliferative DR, but among those who progressed, the time to progression was lengthened with DEX (P<0.001; median 531.1 days with DEX versus 191 with sham).

Conclusion: This post hoc analysis of MEAD study data showed that DEX treatment may potentially have a positive impact on DR by reducing disease severity and slowing progression in DR patients with central DME.

地塞米松植入物对减缓糖尿病视网膜病变进展的影响:MEAD研究的事后分析
目的:评价地塞米松玻璃体内植入(DEX)治疗对糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度量表(DRSS)评分及疾病进展的影响。方法:这项为期3年的随机3期MEAD研究评估了DME患者的DEX 0.35和0.7 mg与假药(间隔≥6个月)的对比。该事后分析使用了假药组和合用DEX组的数据。结果:仅在24个月时,DEX治疗后DRSS评分改善≥2步的患者比例明显高于假手术(8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016)。在DRSS评分改善≥2步的患者中,使用右美托咪酮达到第一个≥2步改善的时间更短(结论:对MEAD研究数据的事后分析表明,右美托咪酮治疗可能通过降低疾病严重程度和减缓中枢性DME的DR患者的进展,对DR产生潜在的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信