Kevin J Blinder, Charles C Wykoff, Joseph R Ferencz, Justis P Ehlers, Yixin Fang, Hongxin Lai, Miller Ogidigben, Francisco J López
{"title":"Impact of the Dexamethasone Implant on Slowing Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: Post Hoc Analysis of the MEAD Study.","authors":"Kevin J Blinder, Charles C Wykoff, Joseph R Ferencz, Justis P Ehlers, Yixin Fang, Hongxin Lai, Miller Ogidigben, Francisco J López","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) treatment on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores and disease progression in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 3-year, randomized, phase 3 MEAD study evaluated DEX 0.35 and 0.7 mg versus sham (treatment at ≥6-month intervals) in patients with DME. This post hoc analysis used data from the sham and pooled DEX arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement was significantly higher after DEX treatment compared with sham at 24 months only (8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016). Among those with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, the time to first ≥2-step improvement was shorter with DEX (P<0.001; median 400 days with DEX versus 713 with sham). There were no significant differences between the DEX and sham groups in the proportion of patients who progressed from non-proliferative to proliferative DR, but among those who progressed, the time to progression was lengthened with DEX (P<0.001; median 531.1 days with DEX versus 191 with sham).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This post hoc analysis of MEAD study data showed that DEX treatment may potentially have a positive impact on DR by reducing disease severity and slowing progression in DR patients with central DME.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) treatment on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores and disease progression in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
Methods: The 3-year, randomized, phase 3 MEAD study evaluated DEX 0.35 and 0.7 mg versus sham (treatment at ≥6-month intervals) in patients with DME. This post hoc analysis used data from the sham and pooled DEX arms.
Results: The proportion of patients with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement was significantly higher after DEX treatment compared with sham at 24 months only (8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016). Among those with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, the time to first ≥2-step improvement was shorter with DEX (P<0.001; median 400 days with DEX versus 713 with sham). There were no significant differences between the DEX and sham groups in the proportion of patients who progressed from non-proliferative to proliferative DR, but among those who progressed, the time to progression was lengthened with DEX (P<0.001; median 531.1 days with DEX versus 191 with sham).
Conclusion: This post hoc analysis of MEAD study data showed that DEX treatment may potentially have a positive impact on DR by reducing disease severity and slowing progression in DR patients with central DME.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.