Binaural fusion in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.

IF 1.2 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-25 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2025.2535851
Lucrèce de Villars, John J Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu, Faustine Legrand, Mathieu Robier, David Bakhos
{"title":"Binaural fusion in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.","authors":"Lucrèce de Villars, John J Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu, Faustine Legrand, Mathieu Robier, David Bakhos","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2535851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Single-sided deaf (SSD) cochlear implant (CI) patients often have difficulty with spatial perception, which may be partly due to limited fusion of acoustic and electric hearing. In the present study, we investigated binaural fusion in SSD CI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight adult SSD CI patients participated in the study. Binaural fusion was measured using speech and non-speech stimuli. Listeners indicated whether they heard 1 or 2 auditory images, the diffuseness of the sound, and lateralization of sounds in a virtual space.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Binaural fusion and similarity ratings were highly variable across participants. Across all participants and stimuli, a single auditory image was perceived only 40.23 ± 38.46% of the time. Sensitivity to stimulus types varied greatly across participants, but in no consistent manner. Diffuseness was significantly larger for words and environmental sounds than for sentences and tones. When one image was perceived, stimuli were generally lateralized towards the center. When two images were perceived, the mean lateralization was 57.11 ± 56.67 degrees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Binaural fusion in the present SSD CI users was much less than observed in previous studies with bilateral CI users, possibly due to differences in stimulation patterns between acoustic and electric hearing and interaural frequency mismatch.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"221-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2535851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Single-sided deaf (SSD) cochlear implant (CI) patients often have difficulty with spatial perception, which may be partly due to limited fusion of acoustic and electric hearing. In the present study, we investigated binaural fusion in SSD CI patients.

Methods: Eight adult SSD CI patients participated in the study. Binaural fusion was measured using speech and non-speech stimuli. Listeners indicated whether they heard 1 or 2 auditory images, the diffuseness of the sound, and lateralization of sounds in a virtual space.

Results: Binaural fusion and similarity ratings were highly variable across participants. Across all participants and stimuli, a single auditory image was perceived only 40.23 ± 38.46% of the time. Sensitivity to stimulus types varied greatly across participants, but in no consistent manner. Diffuseness was significantly larger for words and environmental sounds than for sentences and tones. When one image was perceived, stimuli were generally lateralized towards the center. When two images were perceived, the mean lateralization was 57.11 ± 56.67 degrees.

Conclusions: Binaural fusion in the present SSD CI users was much less than observed in previous studies with bilateral CI users, possibly due to differences in stimulation patterns between acoustic and electric hearing and interaural frequency mismatch.

双耳融合在单侧耳蜗植入者中的应用。
目的:单侧耳聋(SSD)人工耳蜗(CI)患者常存在空间感知困难,其部分原因可能是听音和电听融合有限。在本研究中,我们研究了SSD CI患者的双耳融合。方法:8例成人SSD CI患者参与研究。用言语和非言语刺激测量双耳融合。听者指出他们是听到了1个还是2个听觉图像,声音的扩散,以及虚拟空间中声音的横向化。结果:双耳融合和相似度评分在参与者之间变化很大。在所有参与者和刺激中,单一听觉图像的感知率仅为40.23±38.46%。不同参与者对刺激类型的敏感性差异很大,但并不是一致的。单词和环境声音的扩散明显大于句子和音调。当一个图像被感知时,刺激通常向中心偏侧。两幅图像时,平均偏侧度为57.11±56.67度。结论:当前SSD CI使用者的双耳融合远少于之前双侧CI使用者的研究,可能是由于声学和电听觉之间的刺激模式差异以及耳间频率不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信