Illuminating Gaps in Laser Education in Urology Residency Programs.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1177/08927790251360267
Kyle R DeRoma, Raymond Lanzafame, Greg Adey, Lori B Lerner
{"title":"Illuminating Gaps in Laser Education in Urology Residency Programs.","authors":"Kyle R DeRoma, Raymond Lanzafame, Greg Adey, Lori B Lerner","doi":"10.1177/08927790251360267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Urologists utilize numerous laser technologies. The American Urological Association (AUA) has an online laser education module, but no standardized program curriculum is required. We sought to understand gaps in knowledge surrounding laser technologies in the AUA New England (NE) Section to inform decisions around the annual Residents Skills Course and overall resident education. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An anonymous questionnaire assessing basic laser information and attitudes was created. All academic urology training programs in NE (<i>n</i> = 12) were invited. Responders were encouraged to give their best guess rather than confer or look up answers. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 62% of residents (<i>n</i> = 72) and 62 attendings from the 12 NE programs participated. The most common laser technology uses were nephrolithiasis, urothelial cancer, prostate, strictures, and skin. Faculty varied as regards which diseases residents should apply lasers, be trained in, and show competence. Residents felt less confident in their baseline knowledge as compared with attendings, but most in both groups rated their knowledge lower after completing the questionnaire. Knowledge of the nominal optical hazard distance for each wavelength was negligible. Some respondents could not differentiate between laser wavelength, depth of penetration, Joules, Hertz, or Watts; and very few could explain the difference between standard holmium and Moses, and thulium (solid state) <i>vs</i> thulium fiber. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Gaps in knowledge surrounding laser technologies are significant. Urologists acknowledge deficiencies, yet only 25% to 32% are very likely to seek information on their own. Standardized laser education that is frequently updated and delivered will improve overall knowledge and reduce the risk for patient harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"1068-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251360267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Urologists utilize numerous laser technologies. The American Urological Association (AUA) has an online laser education module, but no standardized program curriculum is required. We sought to understand gaps in knowledge surrounding laser technologies in the AUA New England (NE) Section to inform decisions around the annual Residents Skills Course and overall resident education. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire assessing basic laser information and attitudes was created. All academic urology training programs in NE (n = 12) were invited. Responders were encouraged to give their best guess rather than confer or look up answers. Results: A total of 62% of residents (n = 72) and 62 attendings from the 12 NE programs participated. The most common laser technology uses were nephrolithiasis, urothelial cancer, prostate, strictures, and skin. Faculty varied as regards which diseases residents should apply lasers, be trained in, and show competence. Residents felt less confident in their baseline knowledge as compared with attendings, but most in both groups rated their knowledge lower after completing the questionnaire. Knowledge of the nominal optical hazard distance for each wavelength was negligible. Some respondents could not differentiate between laser wavelength, depth of penetration, Joules, Hertz, or Watts; and very few could explain the difference between standard holmium and Moses, and thulium (solid state) vs thulium fiber. Conclusions: Gaps in knowledge surrounding laser technologies are significant. Urologists acknowledge deficiencies, yet only 25% to 32% are very likely to seek information on their own. Standardized laser education that is frequently updated and delivered will improve overall knowledge and reduce the risk for patient harm.

泌尿外科住院医师项目中激光教育的空白。
目的:泌尿科医生使用多种激光技术。美国泌尿协会(AUA)有一个在线激光教育模块,但不需要标准化的课程。我们试图了解AUA新英格兰(NE)分会在激光技术方面的知识差距,以便为年度住院医师技能课程和整体住院医师教育的决策提供信息。方法:采用匿名问卷法对激光基本信息和态度进行调查。我们邀请了东北地区所有泌尿外科学术培训项目(n = 12)。回应者被鼓励给出他们最好的猜测,而不是讨论或查找答案。结果:12个NE项目共有62%的住院医师(n = 72)和62名主治医师参与。最常见的激光技术应用是肾结石、尿路上皮癌、前列腺、狭窄和皮肤。对于住院医生应该使用激光治疗、接受培训和展示能力的疾病,院系各不相同。与主治医生相比,住院医生对自己的基本知识缺乏信心,但在完成调查问卷后,两组中的大多数人都对自己的知识评分较低。对每个波长的标称光学危害距离的了解可以忽略不计。一些受访者无法区分激光波长、穿透深度、焦耳、赫兹或瓦;很少有人能解释标准钬和Moses,以及铥(固态)和铥纤维之间的区别。结论:围绕激光技术的知识差距很大。泌尿科医生承认自己的不足,但只有25%到32%的人愿意自己寻找信息。经常更新和提供的标准化激光教育将提高整体知识并降低患者伤害的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信