Time to Diagnosis in Dementia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Olubunmi Kusoro, Moïse Roche, Rafael Del-Pino-Casado, Phuong Leung, Vasiliki Orgeta
{"title":"Time to Diagnosis in Dementia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis","authors":"Olubunmi Kusoro,&nbsp;Moïse Roche,&nbsp;Rafael Del-Pino-Casado,&nbsp;Phuong Leung,&nbsp;Vasiliki Orgeta","doi":"10.1002/gps.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Timely dementia diagnosis is a global priority, reflected in most national and regional policies and plans. Nevertheless, there are currently no robust estimates of the average time to diagnosis (TTD) and factors influencing diagnostic intervals. This article presents the first systematic review of quantitative studies on TTD in dementia and the factors associated with its duration. We systematically searched EMBASE, Psych INFO, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for relevant studies published up to December 2024. We defined TTD as the interval between symptom onset (rated by family carers or patients using interviews or medical records) to final diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Reporting studies on time to diagnosis tool. We included 13 studies reporting data on 30,257 participants, with age at onset ranging between 54 and 93 years. Meta-analysis pooling 10 studies showed that average mean TTD across all types of dementia was 3.5 years [confidence interval (CI): 2.7–4.3; moderate quality evidence]. Analyses of six studies showed that TTD in young onset dementia was 4.1 years (CI: 3.4–4.9; moderate quality evidence). Although the factors influencing TTD were inconsistent, a younger age at onset and having frontotemporal dementia were consistently associated with a longer interval to diagnosis. TTD in dementia remains long, and specific healthcare strategies are urgently needed to improve it. Increasing the evidence base and developing interventions to reduce TTD should be a future research priority. Specialist services are likely to be key in improving TTD in young-onset dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"40 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Timely dementia diagnosis is a global priority, reflected in most national and regional policies and plans. Nevertheless, there are currently no robust estimates of the average time to diagnosis (TTD) and factors influencing diagnostic intervals. This article presents the first systematic review of quantitative studies on TTD in dementia and the factors associated with its duration. We systematically searched EMBASE, Psych INFO, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for relevant studies published up to December 2024. We defined TTD as the interval between symptom onset (rated by family carers or patients using interviews or medical records) to final diagnosis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Reporting studies on time to diagnosis tool. We included 13 studies reporting data on 30,257 participants, with age at onset ranging between 54 and 93 years. Meta-analysis pooling 10 studies showed that average mean TTD across all types of dementia was 3.5 years [confidence interval (CI): 2.7–4.3; moderate quality evidence]. Analyses of six studies showed that TTD in young onset dementia was 4.1 years (CI: 3.4–4.9; moderate quality evidence). Although the factors influencing TTD were inconsistent, a younger age at onset and having frontotemporal dementia were consistently associated with a longer interval to diagnosis. TTD in dementia remains long, and specific healthcare strategies are urgently needed to improve it. Increasing the evidence base and developing interventions to reduce TTD should be a future research priority. Specialist services are likely to be key in improving TTD in young-onset dementia.

Abstract Image

痴呆的诊断时间:荟萃分析的系统回顾
及时诊断痴呆症是一项全球优先事项,反映在大多数国家和区域政策和计划中。然而,目前还没有对平均诊断时间(TTD)和影响诊断间隔的因素的可靠估计。本文首次系统回顾了TTD在痴呆中的定量研究及其持续时间的相关因素。我们系统地检索了EMBASE、Psych INFO、MEDLINE和CINAHL数据库,检索了截止到2024年12月发表的相关研究。我们将TTD定义为症状发作(由家庭护理人员或患者通过访谈或医疗记录评定)到最终诊断之间的时间间隔。偏倚风险采用报告研究的诊断时间工具进行评估。我们纳入了13项研究,报告了30,257名参与者的数据,他们的发病年龄在54至93岁之间。汇总10项研究的荟萃分析显示,所有类型痴呆的平均平均TTD为3.5年[置信区间(CI): 2.7-4.3;中等质量证据]。对6项研究的分析显示,年轻痴呆患者的TTD为4.1年(CI: 3.4-4.9;中等质量证据)。虽然影响TTD的因素不一致,但发病年龄较年轻和患有额颞叶痴呆始终与较长的诊断间隔相关。痴呆症的TTD仍然很长,迫切需要具体的医疗保健策略来改善它。增加证据基础和制定减少TTD的干预措施应该是未来研究的重点。专家服务可能是改善年轻痴呆患者TTD的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信