Effectiveness of un-decimated wavelet transform in time-series forecasting: A PV power calculation case study in BTU

IF 9.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mehmet Albayram , Alper Yılmaz , Gökay Bayrak , Kivanc Basaran , Luminita Georgeta Popescu
{"title":"Effectiveness of un-decimated wavelet transform in time-series forecasting: A PV power calculation case study in BTU","authors":"Mehmet Albayram ,&nbsp;Alper Yılmaz ,&nbsp;Gökay Bayrak ,&nbsp;Kivanc Basaran ,&nbsp;Luminita Georgeta Popescu","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2025.124062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored the effectiveness of Un-Decimated Wavelet Transform (UWT) in time-series applications, using photovoltaic (PV) calculation as a case study. Real-time measurements of irradiance, ambient temperature, module temperature, and humidity were collected at 5-min intervals from a 1.2 kW rooftop PV system at Bursa Technical University. Wavelet-based features extracted with both UWT and the conventional Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) were combined with regression and tree-based learners to build 16 hybrid models. The results show that the shift-invariant UWT significantly improves both feature extraction and prediction accuracy compared to the DWT approach. The UWT–DT model achieved the highest accuracy, with the lowest MSE (0.0001), the lowest RMSE (0.0118) and the highest R<sup>2</sup> coefficient (0.9986). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test applied to paired RMSE values confirmed that these improvements were statistically significant (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></math></span> value &lt; 0.05 for UWT-DT vs DWT-DT). In terms of computational complexity, the 'à trous' algorithm used in UWT requires convolution operations at every level, resulting in higher processing costs than DWT (12 ms feature extraction per 1024-sample input). However, the full-resolution features provided by UWT significantly reduced the error rates of tree-based models, raising R<sup>2</sup> above 0.99.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 124062"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125017264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of Un-Decimated Wavelet Transform (UWT) in time-series applications, using photovoltaic (PV) calculation as a case study. Real-time measurements of irradiance, ambient temperature, module temperature, and humidity were collected at 5-min intervals from a 1.2 kW rooftop PV system at Bursa Technical University. Wavelet-based features extracted with both UWT and the conventional Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) were combined with regression and tree-based learners to build 16 hybrid models. The results show that the shift-invariant UWT significantly improves both feature extraction and prediction accuracy compared to the DWT approach. The UWT–DT model achieved the highest accuracy, with the lowest MSE (0.0001), the lowest RMSE (0.0118) and the highest R2 coefficient (0.9986). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test applied to paired RMSE values confirmed that these improvements were statistically significant (p value < 0.05 for UWT-DT vs DWT-DT). In terms of computational complexity, the 'à trous' algorithm used in UWT requires convolution operations at every level, resulting in higher processing costs than DWT (12 ms feature extraction per 1024-sample input). However, the full-resolution features provided by UWT significantly reduced the error rates of tree-based models, raising R2 above 0.99.
非抽取小波变换在时间序列预测中的有效性:以BTU光伏发电计算为例研究
本研究以光伏(PV)计算为例,探讨了未抽取小波变换(UWT)在时间序列应用中的有效性。在布尔萨技术大学的1.2 kW屋顶光伏系统中,每隔5分钟收集实时测量的辐照度、环境温度、模块温度和湿度。将UWT和传统离散小波变换(DWT)提取的小波特征与回归和基于树的学习器相结合,构建了16个混合模型。结果表明,与DWT方法相比,平移不变UWT显著提高了特征提取和预测精度。UWT-DT模型精度最高,MSE最低(0.0001),RMSE最低(0.0118),R2系数最高(0.9986)。对配对RMSE值进行的Wilcoxon sign -rank检验证实,这些改善具有统计学意义(p值<;UWT-DT vs DWT-DT为0.05)。在计算复杂性方面,UWT中使用的“特罗斯”算法需要在每个级别进行卷积操作,导致处理成本高于DWT(每1024个样本输入提取12 ms特征)。然而,UWT提供的全分辨率特征显著降低了基于树的模型的错误率,使R2高于0.99。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信