Justin J.Y. Tan , Win Lwin Thuya , Hongyu Zhu , Jessie G. Kristo , John E. Common , Chunyong Wu , Paul C.L. Ho , Lifeng Kang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of 3D and 2D cell-culturing methods in hair follicle spheroid morphogenesis and drug responsiveness","authors":"Justin J.Y. Tan , Win Lwin Thuya , Hongyu Zhu , Jessie G. Kristo , John E. Common , Chunyong Wu , Paul C.L. Ho , Lifeng Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Three-dimensional (3D) cell-culturing methods have usually been considered superior to two-dimensional (2D) culturing for in-vitro tissue formation intended for tissue engineering and drug research applications, including hair follicle (HF) development. However, cellular interactions within 3D cultures are generally more complex and therefore, may require further investigation. Apart from grafting in-vitro cultured (2D and 3D) dermal papilla cells directly onto the skin of animals to study the impact of 3D culturing on hair inductivity, molecular studies remain lacking in the understanding of how 2D and 3D culturing methods influence the morphogenesis of early stage HF models. The proposition that 3D cultures is always superior to 2D cultures for mimicking HF at its early developmental stage remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of 3D and 2D culturing methods on the morphogenesis of HFs. 3D-cultured spheroids were assumed to exhibit greater expressions of HF-associated proteins and more expected drug-induced expression responses than 2D cultures. Dermal papilla cells and keratinocytes were cultured together in 2D and 3D cultures, where polyethylene glycol diacrylate microwell arrays were designed to provide the 3D culturing environment. Both 2D and 3D cultures were treated with either minoxidil or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and the expressions of four hair proteins were analyzed.</div><div>The results showed that 3D cultures responded in more expected ways than 2D cultures when exposed to minoxidil, demonstrating a significant increase in trichohyalin (AE15, one of the 4 proteins) as expected, while 2D cultures exhibited a significant down-regulation. On the other hand, surprisingly, DHT treatment significantly reduced all protein expressions in 2D culture as expected, but did not significantly alter protein expression in 3D culture, suggesting that 2D cultures could respond better than 3D cultures in DHT treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 214423"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277295082500250X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell-culturing methods have usually been considered superior to two-dimensional (2D) culturing for in-vitro tissue formation intended for tissue engineering and drug research applications, including hair follicle (HF) development. However, cellular interactions within 3D cultures are generally more complex and therefore, may require further investigation. Apart from grafting in-vitro cultured (2D and 3D) dermal papilla cells directly onto the skin of animals to study the impact of 3D culturing on hair inductivity, molecular studies remain lacking in the understanding of how 2D and 3D culturing methods influence the morphogenesis of early stage HF models. The proposition that 3D cultures is always superior to 2D cultures for mimicking HF at its early developmental stage remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of 3D and 2D culturing methods on the morphogenesis of HFs. 3D-cultured spheroids were assumed to exhibit greater expressions of HF-associated proteins and more expected drug-induced expression responses than 2D cultures. Dermal papilla cells and keratinocytes were cultured together in 2D and 3D cultures, where polyethylene glycol diacrylate microwell arrays were designed to provide the 3D culturing environment. Both 2D and 3D cultures were treated with either minoxidil or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and the expressions of four hair proteins were analyzed.
The results showed that 3D cultures responded in more expected ways than 2D cultures when exposed to minoxidil, demonstrating a significant increase in trichohyalin (AE15, one of the 4 proteins) as expected, while 2D cultures exhibited a significant down-regulation. On the other hand, surprisingly, DHT treatment significantly reduced all protein expressions in 2D culture as expected, but did not significantly alter protein expression in 3D culture, suggesting that 2D cultures could respond better than 3D cultures in DHT treatment.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!