Holidays abroad of Dutch citizens do not increase their appetite for greater European integration

IF 4.1 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Juan Díez Medrano , Juan J. Fernández
{"title":"Holidays abroad of Dutch citizens do not increase their appetite for greater European integration","authors":"Juan Díez Medrano ,&nbsp;Juan J. Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.annale.2025.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>What is the relationship between international travel and pro-European dispositions? Most theoretical research on European integration argues that international travel fosters these dispositions, and many cross-sectional studies support this expectation. However, support for this association rests on strong and questionable micro-foundational assumptions. This article critically engages with the association between international travel and pro-European dispositions. To do so, we draw on social psychology models and tourism research, which emphasize that the quality and impact of travel experiences are highly heterogeneous and contingent on individual, interactional, and contextual factors. Building on these perspectives, we predict no association between international travel and support for further European integration. To test this prediction, we use panel data from the Netherlands and employ two-way fixed-effects models to evaluate both the positive and negligible association hypotheses. In line with our prediction, we find that among Dutch citizens, within-individual increases in the number of international trips are not significantly related to changes in support for European integration. In summary, evidence from a rigorous test does not support the claim that typical international travel fosters pro-European dispositions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34520,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666957925000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is the relationship between international travel and pro-European dispositions? Most theoretical research on European integration argues that international travel fosters these dispositions, and many cross-sectional studies support this expectation. However, support for this association rests on strong and questionable micro-foundational assumptions. This article critically engages with the association between international travel and pro-European dispositions. To do so, we draw on social psychology models and tourism research, which emphasize that the quality and impact of travel experiences are highly heterogeneous and contingent on individual, interactional, and contextual factors. Building on these perspectives, we predict no association between international travel and support for further European integration. To test this prediction, we use panel data from the Netherlands and employ two-way fixed-effects models to evaluate both the positive and negligible association hypotheses. In line with our prediction, we find that among Dutch citizens, within-individual increases in the number of international trips are not significantly related to changes in support for European integration. In summary, evidence from a rigorous test does not support the claim that typical international travel fosters pro-European dispositions.
荷兰公民出国度假并没有增加他们对欧洲一体化的兴趣
国际旅行和亲欧倾向之间的关系是什么?大多数关于欧洲一体化的理论研究认为,国际旅行促进了这些倾向,许多横断面研究也支持这一预期。然而,对这种联系的支持建立在强大而可疑的微观基础假设之上。这篇文章批判性地探讨了国际旅行和亲欧洲倾向之间的联系。为此,我们借鉴了社会心理学模型和旅游研究,它们强调旅游体验的质量和影响是高度异质性的,取决于个人、互动和环境因素。基于这些观点,我们预测国际旅行和对进一步欧洲一体化的支持之间没有关联。为了验证这一预测,我们使用来自荷兰的面板数据,并采用双向固定效应模型来评估正关联假设和可忽略关联假设。与我们的预测一致,我们发现在荷兰公民中,个人内部国际旅行次数的增加与支持欧洲一体化的变化没有显著相关。总之,来自严格测试的证据并不支持典型的国际旅行促进亲欧倾向的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights
Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
106 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信