Yi Zhang , Jacques Monnier , Philip Bulsink , Moataz Abdrabou , Jian Li , Xin Pang , Nafiseh Zaker , Rafal Gieleciak
{"title":"Evaluation of diesel fuel production from bio-oils hydrodeoxygenation using unsupported MoS2 catalysts","authors":"Yi Zhang , Jacques Monnier , Philip Bulsink , Moataz Abdrabou , Jian Li , Xin Pang , Nafiseh Zaker , Rafal Gieleciak","doi":"10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diesel production from lignocellulosic biomass-derived fast pyrolysis bio-oil (FPBO) and catalytic pyrolysis bio-oil (CPBO) was investigated with an upgrading approach using unsupported MoS<sub>2</sub> catalysts generated in situ. Hydrodeoxygenation of FPBO and CPBO was evaluated in a continuous-flow reactor system using feed blends containing 18 wt% bio-oil in fuel oil. For FPBO, 92.9 % deoxygenation was achieved with 0.51 wt% O in oil products, resulting in low acidity (0.32 mg KOH/g), while 74.8 % deoxygenation was obtained for CPBO with 1.24 wt% O and 0.48 mg KOH/g acidity in oil products. The lower deoxygenation of CPBO suggests that oxygenates in CPBO are less reactive than those in FPBO. In both cases, low solid yields were observed from 1.2 to 2.0 g/100 g bio-oil. XRD and HRTEM detected few-layer stacked structure for the in-situ formed MoS<sub>2</sub> catalysts. The oil product from CPBO retained more biogenic carbon than from FPBO, with the diesel fraction from CPBO exhibiting a higher biogenic carbon content and yield. Both diesel cuts meet almost all ASTM D975 specifications, except for S content, resulting from the high S/Mo feed ratio used in the tests. Evaluation results demonstrated great potential for producing specifications-conforming diesel fractions from FPBO and CPBO upgrading using unsupported MoS<sub>2</sub> catalyst.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":326,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Processing Technology","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 108290"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Processing Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382025001146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diesel production from lignocellulosic biomass-derived fast pyrolysis bio-oil (FPBO) and catalytic pyrolysis bio-oil (CPBO) was investigated with an upgrading approach using unsupported MoS2 catalysts generated in situ. Hydrodeoxygenation of FPBO and CPBO was evaluated in a continuous-flow reactor system using feed blends containing 18 wt% bio-oil in fuel oil. For FPBO, 92.9 % deoxygenation was achieved with 0.51 wt% O in oil products, resulting in low acidity (0.32 mg KOH/g), while 74.8 % deoxygenation was obtained for CPBO with 1.24 wt% O and 0.48 mg KOH/g acidity in oil products. The lower deoxygenation of CPBO suggests that oxygenates in CPBO are less reactive than those in FPBO. In both cases, low solid yields were observed from 1.2 to 2.0 g/100 g bio-oil. XRD and HRTEM detected few-layer stacked structure for the in-situ formed MoS2 catalysts. The oil product from CPBO retained more biogenic carbon than from FPBO, with the diesel fraction from CPBO exhibiting a higher biogenic carbon content and yield. Both diesel cuts meet almost all ASTM D975 specifications, except for S content, resulting from the high S/Mo feed ratio used in the tests. Evaluation results demonstrated great potential for producing specifications-conforming diesel fractions from FPBO and CPBO upgrading using unsupported MoS2 catalyst.
期刊介绍:
Fuel Processing Technology (FPT) deals with the scientific and technological aspects of converting fossil and renewable resources to clean fuels, value-added chemicals, fuel-related advanced carbon materials and by-products. In addition to the traditional non-nuclear fossil fuels, biomass and wastes, papers on the integration of renewables such as solar and wind energy and energy storage into the fuel processing processes, as well as papers on the production and conversion of non-carbon-containing fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia, are also welcome. While chemical conversion is emphasized, papers on advanced physical conversion processes are also considered for publication in FPT. Papers on the fundamental aspects of fuel structure and properties will also be considered.