{"title":"Thioarsenate immobilization by ferrous sulfides for geogenic contaminated groundwater rehabilitation: Mechanisms and kinetic constraints","authors":"Xiaona Li, Chaoyu Zhang, Kunfu Pi, Xianjun Xie, Yuxia Li, Yanxin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.124306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thioarsenic prevails in sulfidic environments and exhibits higher mobility than arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)), posing sustaining challenge to the effectiveness of geogenic As-contaminated groundwater rehabilitation. Ferrous sulfide (FeS) minerals are proposed scavengers of monothioarsenate (MTA) in sulfidic groundwater, but the underlying mechanisms and kinetic processes remain elusive. This research presents new key evidence that MTA retention by FeS is constrained by a multi-reaction process: initial rapid adsorption, and subsequently slow binding to kinetics-controlled sites and irreversibly-retained phase. Polysulfides critically strengthen MTA retention by transforming MTA to less mobile As(V) and facilitating arsenopyrite (FeAsS) production. Simulating MTA isothermal adsorption edge with modified dual mode model confirms that MTA removal involves surface chemisorption and mineral transformation. While MTA removal rates were higher under weakly acidic conditions (pH 6-7), more stable FeAsS formed under alkaline conditions (pH 8-9) can strengthen As immobilization against re-desorption. Further column experiments to mimic in-situ FeS coating for MTA immobilization indicate that the simultaneously formed FeS, which induces MTA co-precipitation and production of pyrite and FeAsS, exhibited greater retention capacity than the pre-loaded FeS. These findings manifest important implications in scheming modes of in-situ Fe coating and transformation for managed rehabilitation of As-contaminated groundwater.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thioarsenic prevails in sulfidic environments and exhibits higher mobility than arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)), posing sustaining challenge to the effectiveness of geogenic As-contaminated groundwater rehabilitation. Ferrous sulfide (FeS) minerals are proposed scavengers of monothioarsenate (MTA) in sulfidic groundwater, but the underlying mechanisms and kinetic processes remain elusive. This research presents new key evidence that MTA retention by FeS is constrained by a multi-reaction process: initial rapid adsorption, and subsequently slow binding to kinetics-controlled sites and irreversibly-retained phase. Polysulfides critically strengthen MTA retention by transforming MTA to less mobile As(V) and facilitating arsenopyrite (FeAsS) production. Simulating MTA isothermal adsorption edge with modified dual mode model confirms that MTA removal involves surface chemisorption and mineral transformation. While MTA removal rates were higher under weakly acidic conditions (pH 6-7), more stable FeAsS formed under alkaline conditions (pH 8-9) can strengthen As immobilization against re-desorption. Further column experiments to mimic in-situ FeS coating for MTA immobilization indicate that the simultaneously formed FeS, which induces MTA co-precipitation and production of pyrite and FeAsS, exhibited greater retention capacity than the pre-loaded FeS. These findings manifest important implications in scheming modes of in-situ Fe coating and transformation for managed rehabilitation of As-contaminated groundwater.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.