Integrating multiple data sources with species distribution models to estimate the distribution and abundance of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) in the United States
William B. Lewis , Sprih Harsh , Patrick Freeman , Victoria Nolan , Justin Suraci , Bridgett E. Costanzo , James A. Martin
{"title":"Integrating multiple data sources with species distribution models to estimate the distribution and abundance of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) in the United States","authors":"William B. Lewis , Sprih Harsh , Patrick Freeman , Victoria Nolan , Justin Suraci , Bridgett E. Costanzo , James A. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Species distribution models (SDMs) have traditionally focused on occupancy despite abundance potentially being a more useful metric for informing conservation initiatives. Integrating m<em>ultiple species</em> abundance datasets could retain the strengths of each data type and, at least partially, offset their weaknesses, potentially improving the performance of abundance-based SDMs. We developed spatially-non-stationary, abundance-based SDMs to assess the environmental drivers of spatial variation in abundance and to predict the abundance and distribution of northern bobwhite (<em>Colinus virginianus</em>) across the United States. We fitted Bayesian SDMs with regionally-partitioned coefficients by integrating structured North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) and semi-structured eBird count data. We found that bobwhite abundance was concentrated in three main regions: southern Texas, the Great/Midwestern Plains, and the southeastern coastal plain. Total abundance across the range was estimated at 8,577,291 (8,292,554 - 8,933,202). While the spatial extent of the predicted bobwhite range was generally similar across models, models fit with single data sources appeared to vastly underestimate (eBird) or overestimate (BBS) abundance, though abundance estimation was improved through data integration. Most covariate effects exhibited non-stationarity across the range, potentially leading to inappropriate inferences or management decisions from a spatially-stationary model. Our study provides an important example of how datasets collected at different spatial scales under different observation protocols can be integrated via SDMs to improve abundance-based modeling and correct for weaknesses of individual datasets. Our modeling framework provides regional estimates of the drivers of bobwhite abundance and range-wide estimates of abundance for guiding both local and range-wide bobwhite conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"509 ","pages":"Article 111265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025002510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) have traditionally focused on occupancy despite abundance potentially being a more useful metric for informing conservation initiatives. Integrating multiple species abundance datasets could retain the strengths of each data type and, at least partially, offset their weaknesses, potentially improving the performance of abundance-based SDMs. We developed spatially-non-stationary, abundance-based SDMs to assess the environmental drivers of spatial variation in abundance and to predict the abundance and distribution of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) across the United States. We fitted Bayesian SDMs with regionally-partitioned coefficients by integrating structured North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) and semi-structured eBird count data. We found that bobwhite abundance was concentrated in three main regions: southern Texas, the Great/Midwestern Plains, and the southeastern coastal plain. Total abundance across the range was estimated at 8,577,291 (8,292,554 - 8,933,202). While the spatial extent of the predicted bobwhite range was generally similar across models, models fit with single data sources appeared to vastly underestimate (eBird) or overestimate (BBS) abundance, though abundance estimation was improved through data integration. Most covariate effects exhibited non-stationarity across the range, potentially leading to inappropriate inferences or management decisions from a spatially-stationary model. Our study provides an important example of how datasets collected at different spatial scales under different observation protocols can be integrated via SDMs to improve abundance-based modeling and correct for weaknesses of individual datasets. Our modeling framework provides regional estimates of the drivers of bobwhite abundance and range-wide estimates of abundance for guiding both local and range-wide bobwhite conservation.
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).