Sonia Tomé-Rodríguez , Carlos Augusto Ledesma-Escobar , Laura Carpintero , Javier Dupuy , Andrés Donadeu , Judit Macías-Vidal , María Cambra-López , Juan José Pascual , Feliciano Priego-Capote
{"title":"In vitro and in vivo comparison of phytic acid dephosphorylation mechanisms by 3- and 6-phytases in broiler diets","authors":"Sonia Tomé-Rodríguez , Carlos Augusto Ledesma-Escobar , Laura Carpintero , Javier Dupuy , Andrés Donadeu , Judit Macías-Vidal , María Cambra-López , Juan José Pascual , Feliciano Priego-Capote","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diets for farmed monogastric animals are supplemented with phytase to improve the bioavailability of phosphorus. Commercially, 6-phytases are preferred over 3-phytases due to differences in their sources, kinetics, and optimal operational pH. We examined both in vitro and in vivo dephosphorylation of phytate phosphorus by 3- and 6-phytases using high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify phytic acid, inositol phosphate intermediates, and free inositol. In vitro, 3-phytases exhibited conversion rates similar to those of 6-phytases, converting over 95 % of phytic IP6 into IP2 or IP1 within one hour. However, mechanistic differences between the two enzymes were observed in vivo. For example, broilers fed 6-phytase exhibited higher levels of inositol in the crop and gizzard than those fed 3-phytase (3.1 mg/g vs 2.4 mg/g). No significant differences were observed in the ileum of animals supplemented with either phytase (approximately 9 mg/g). Overall, 3-phytases can be an effective alternative to the more commonly used 6-phytases for releasing phytate phosphorus in broiler diets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 116449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diets for farmed monogastric animals are supplemented with phytase to improve the bioavailability of phosphorus. Commercially, 6-phytases are preferred over 3-phytases due to differences in their sources, kinetics, and optimal operational pH. We examined both in vitro and in vivo dephosphorylation of phytate phosphorus by 3- and 6-phytases using high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify phytic acid, inositol phosphate intermediates, and free inositol. In vitro, 3-phytases exhibited conversion rates similar to those of 6-phytases, converting over 95 % of phytic IP6 into IP2 or IP1 within one hour. However, mechanistic differences between the two enzymes were observed in vivo. For example, broilers fed 6-phytase exhibited higher levels of inositol in the crop and gizzard than those fed 3-phytase (3.1 mg/g vs 2.4 mg/g). No significant differences were observed in the ileum of animals supplemented with either phytase (approximately 9 mg/g). Overall, 3-phytases can be an effective alternative to the more commonly used 6-phytases for releasing phytate phosphorus in broiler diets.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.