Impact of the interaction between drought and wildfires on the gross primary productivity (GPP) of boreal forest exhibit time-scale dependence on time scales

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY
Shaojie Lai , Risu Na , Li Na , Yin Shan , Mingxing Li , Jisiguleng Wu , Jiarong Wang
{"title":"Impact of the interaction between drought and wildfires on the gross primary productivity (GPP) of boreal forest exhibit time-scale dependence on time scales","authors":"Shaojie Lai ,&nbsp;Risu Na ,&nbsp;Li Na ,&nbsp;Yin Shan ,&nbsp;Mingxing Li ,&nbsp;Jisiguleng Wu ,&nbsp;Jiarong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Changes in forest gross primary productivity (GPP) are essential for understanding the dynamics of the global carbon cycle and impacts of climate change. Given the increasing frequency of droughts and wildfires due to climate change, assessing their impact on GPP in boreal forests has become increasingly important. This study utilized remote sensing data, including GPP data, the standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI), and burned area data from 2001 to 2022, and employed trend analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP values) to examine the spatiotemporal characteristics of GPP in boreal forests and their response mechanisms to drought and wildfires. The results were as follows. (1). GPP in boreal forests exhibited a spatial pattern of being higher in the south and lower in the north, with approximately 54.14 % of the area exhibiting an increasing trend in GPP and approximately 41.0 % showing a decreasing trend. (2) Areas with a declining GPP highly overlapped with regions that experienced intense drought. The SPEI primarily showed a negative correlation with GPP; however, the proportion of positively correlated areas increased with longer SPEI time scales. (3) Wildfires generally exerted a negative impact on vegetation GPP, as burned areas typically decreased in productivity compared to unburned regions; however, most affected areas demonstrated a basic recovery in GPP within five years. (4) Shrublands, grasslands, and savannas exhibited a higher GPP sensitivity to drought and wildfires, whereas forest communities demonstrated greater ecological resilience. (5) The interaction between drought and wildfires exacerbated negative impacts on GPP over short-term time scales; however, a gradual weakening influence was observed over medium- to long-term timescales. This study offers novel insights into and a theoretical foundation for assessing and understanding the impacts of drought and wildfires on the GPP of boreal forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325001797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in forest gross primary productivity (GPP) are essential for understanding the dynamics of the global carbon cycle and impacts of climate change. Given the increasing frequency of droughts and wildfires due to climate change, assessing their impact on GPP in boreal forests has become increasingly important. This study utilized remote sensing data, including GPP data, the standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI), and burned area data from 2001 to 2022, and employed trend analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP values) to examine the spatiotemporal characteristics of GPP in boreal forests and their response mechanisms to drought and wildfires. The results were as follows. (1). GPP in boreal forests exhibited a spatial pattern of being higher in the south and lower in the north, with approximately 54.14 % of the area exhibiting an increasing trend in GPP and approximately 41.0 % showing a decreasing trend. (2) Areas with a declining GPP highly overlapped with regions that experienced intense drought. The SPEI primarily showed a negative correlation with GPP; however, the proportion of positively correlated areas increased with longer SPEI time scales. (3) Wildfires generally exerted a negative impact on vegetation GPP, as burned areas typically decreased in productivity compared to unburned regions; however, most affected areas demonstrated a basic recovery in GPP within five years. (4) Shrublands, grasslands, and savannas exhibited a higher GPP sensitivity to drought and wildfires, whereas forest communities demonstrated greater ecological resilience. (5) The interaction between drought and wildfires exacerbated negative impacts on GPP over short-term time scales; however, a gradual weakening influence was observed over medium- to long-term timescales. This study offers novel insights into and a theoretical foundation for assessing and understanding the impacts of drought and wildfires on the GPP of boreal forests.
干旱与野火相互作用对北方森林总初级生产力(GPP)的影响具有时间尺度依赖性
森林总初级生产力(GPP)的变化对于了解全球碳循环的动态和气候变化的影响至关重要。鉴于气候变化导致的干旱和野火日益频繁,评估它们对北方森林GPP的影响变得越来越重要。利用2001 - 2022年的遥感数据,包括GPP数据、标准化降水-蒸散发指数(SPEI)和烧毁面积数据,采用趋势分析、Pearson相关分析和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)等方法,研究了北方森林GPP的时空特征及其对干旱和野火的响应机制。结果如下:(1). 北方针叶林GPP呈南高北低的空间格局,约54.14%的地区GPP呈上升趋势,约41.0%的地区GPP呈下降趋势。(2) GPP下降区与强干旱区高度重合。SPEI与GPP主要呈负相关;SPEI时间尺度越长,正相关区域所占比例越高。(3)森林火灾对植被GPP的影响总体为负,被烧毁地区的生产力明显低于未被烧毁地区;然而,大多数受灾地区的GPP在五年内基本恢复。(4)灌丛、草原和稀树草原对干旱和野火表现出较高的GPP敏感性,而森林群落表现出更强的生态恢复力。(5)干旱与野火的交互作用在短期内加剧了对GPP的负面影响;然而,在中长期时间尺度上观察到影响逐渐减弱。该研究为评估和理解干旱和野火对北方森林GPP的影响提供了新的见解和理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信