{"title":"Pure or blend: Microbial cultures in the race to optimize butanol production","authors":"Okezie Emmanuel , Rozina , Thaddeus C. Ezeji","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The need to mitigate environmental degradation and reduce dependence on depleting fossil fuel reserves has intensified the search for sustainable energy alternatives, with butanol emerging as a promising alternative fuel due to its excellent fuel properties and compatibility with existing gasoline infrastructure. This review critically examines the role of microbial fermentation in butanol production, focusing on the comparative merits and limitations of pure and mixed culture approaches. Pure cultures, particularly solventogenic <em>Clostridium</em> species, offer advantages in metabolic pathway manipulation and process predictability but are constrained by limited substrate utilization and susceptibility to contamination. Mixed microbial consortia, while providing greater metabolic diversity and environmental resilience, pose challenges in process control and consortium stability. Key advancements in metabolic engineering, strain development, and process optimization are highlighted, emphasizing the integration of innovative molecular techniques such as next-generation sequencing, stable isotope probing, and microfluidics to enhance fermentation processes. Substrate utilization strategies, ranging from simple monosaccharides to complex lignocellulosic biomass and syngas, are evaluated for their impact on production efficiency and economic viability. Furthermore, the review addresses major challenges, including feedstock availability, butanol toxicity, and product recovery, alongside emerging solutions involving genetic engineering and separation technologies. Synthesizing recent research and industrial progress, this review provides actionable insights for optimizing butanol production. It advocates for hybrid strategies that combine the precision of pure cultures with the robustness of mixed consortia, paving the way for scalable and sustainable biofuel solutions. Bridging scientific innovation with industrial application, this review underpins the transformative potential of biobutanol in driving future energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 116131"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The need to mitigate environmental degradation and reduce dependence on depleting fossil fuel reserves has intensified the search for sustainable energy alternatives, with butanol emerging as a promising alternative fuel due to its excellent fuel properties and compatibility with existing gasoline infrastructure. This review critically examines the role of microbial fermentation in butanol production, focusing on the comparative merits and limitations of pure and mixed culture approaches. Pure cultures, particularly solventogenic Clostridium species, offer advantages in metabolic pathway manipulation and process predictability but are constrained by limited substrate utilization and susceptibility to contamination. Mixed microbial consortia, while providing greater metabolic diversity and environmental resilience, pose challenges in process control and consortium stability. Key advancements in metabolic engineering, strain development, and process optimization are highlighted, emphasizing the integration of innovative molecular techniques such as next-generation sequencing, stable isotope probing, and microfluidics to enhance fermentation processes. Substrate utilization strategies, ranging from simple monosaccharides to complex lignocellulosic biomass and syngas, are evaluated for their impact on production efficiency and economic viability. Furthermore, the review addresses major challenges, including feedstock availability, butanol toxicity, and product recovery, alongside emerging solutions involving genetic engineering and separation technologies. Synthesizing recent research and industrial progress, this review provides actionable insights for optimizing butanol production. It advocates for hybrid strategies that combine the precision of pure cultures with the robustness of mixed consortia, paving the way for scalable and sustainable biofuel solutions. Bridging scientific innovation with industrial application, this review underpins the transformative potential of biobutanol in driving future energy systems.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.