Beyond the limits of conventional ‘endpoint’ ELISA and rescuing the signal with lag k-ELISA

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Ksenia Katsanovskaja , Federica Marchesin , Jacquie Ujetz , Samreen Ijaz , Richard Tedder , Myra McClure
{"title":"Beyond the limits of conventional ‘endpoint’ ELISA and rescuing the signal with lag k-ELISA","authors":"Ksenia Katsanovskaja ,&nbsp;Federica Marchesin ,&nbsp;Jacquie Ujetz ,&nbsp;Samreen Ijaz ,&nbsp;Richard Tedder ,&nbsp;Myra McClure","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2025.115231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional colorimetric e-ELISA assays are widely used for quantifying antibodies in serum but are often labour-intensive, costly, and require serial dilutions for high-titre samples to ensure accuracy. To address these limitations, we propose the lag k-ELISA, a novel method for assessing antibody concentrations against SARS-CoV-2 in blood samples. This technique simplifies workflows while reducing time and labor compared to traditional ELISA. In this study, lag k-ELISA was applied to 169 sera for anti-S1 IgG and 79 samples for anti-S1 IgM assessment. Distinct analytical workflows were developed to process kinetic signal data, allowing for the description of Ab content. Key signal metrics—including time at OD minima, k-rates, and signal kinetics—proved effective in distinguishing samples by dilution factor or unitage. The assay’s performance was systematically evaluated under different operating conditions, such as stirring, readout time, and temperature, which significantly impacted assay outcomes and needed to be optimised to enhance the resolving power of lag k-ELISA. Our findings demonstrate that lag k-ELISA is a robust, efficient complement to traditional ELISA methods, offering reliable results with reduced labour, time, and costs. This technique is particularly advantageous for high-titre samples, streamlining antibody quantification workflows without compromising accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 115231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093425001247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional colorimetric e-ELISA assays are widely used for quantifying antibodies in serum but are often labour-intensive, costly, and require serial dilutions for high-titre samples to ensure accuracy. To address these limitations, we propose the lag k-ELISA, a novel method for assessing antibody concentrations against SARS-CoV-2 in blood samples. This technique simplifies workflows while reducing time and labor compared to traditional ELISA. In this study, lag k-ELISA was applied to 169 sera for anti-S1 IgG and 79 samples for anti-S1 IgM assessment. Distinct analytical workflows were developed to process kinetic signal data, allowing for the description of Ab content. Key signal metrics—including time at OD minima, k-rates, and signal kinetics—proved effective in distinguishing samples by dilution factor or unitage. The assay’s performance was systematically evaluated under different operating conditions, such as stirring, readout time, and temperature, which significantly impacted assay outcomes and needed to be optimised to enhance the resolving power of lag k-ELISA. Our findings demonstrate that lag k-ELISA is a robust, efficient complement to traditional ELISA methods, offering reliable results with reduced labour, time, and costs. This technique is particularly advantageous for high-titre samples, streamlining antibody quantification workflows without compromising accuracy.
超越了传统的“终点”酶联免疫吸附试验的限制,用滞后k-酶联免疫吸附试验挽救了信号
传统的比色e-ELISA测定法广泛用于血清抗体的定量,但通常是劳动密集型的,昂贵的,并且需要对高滴度的样品进行连续稀释以确保准确性。为了解决这些局限性,我们提出了lag k-ELISA,这是一种评估血液样本中针对SARS-CoV-2抗体浓度的新方法。与传统ELISA相比,该技术简化了工作流程,同时减少了时间和劳动力。本研究采用lag k-ELISA对169份血清进行抗s1 IgG检测,对79份血清进行抗s1 IgM检测。开发了不同的分析工作流程来处理动力学信号数据,允许描述Ab含量。关键的信号指标——包括OD最小值时间、k速率和信号动力学——被证明是通过稀释系数或单位来区分样品的有效指标。在搅拌、读出时间和温度等不同操作条件下,系统地评估了该试剂盒的性能,这些操作条件对检测结果有显著影响,需要进行优化以提高lag k-ELISA的分辨能力。我们的研究结果表明,lag k-ELISA是传统ELISA方法的一种强大、有效的补充,在减少人工、时间和成本的情况下提供可靠的结果。该技术对高滴度样品特别有利,简化抗体定量工作流程而不影响准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery. The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of: Viral components and morphology- Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors- Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals- Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses- Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment- Viral metagenomics and virome- Virus ecology, adaption and evolution- Applied virology such as nanotechnology- Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation. We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信