Can imagining the future repair trust? The impact of chatbots' trust repair on the continuous interaction intention in service failure

IF 13.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xueying Wang , Yuexian Zhang
{"title":"Can imagining the future repair trust? The impact of chatbots' trust repair on the continuous interaction intention in service failure","authors":"Xueying Wang ,&nbsp;Yuexian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the field of tourism, it is almost inevitable for chatbots to encounter service failures. After a chatbot experiences a service failure, how to conduct effective service recovery is crucial for retaining consumers. Whether a chatbot can enhance continuous interaction intention by enabling customers to envision the time-course of successful service remains unknown. This study aims to discuss the different impacts of chatbots' trust repair, namely ego-moving and event-moving on continuous interaction intention. Three studies were conducted in the study to examine the impact of chatbots' trust repair on continuous interaction intention. Additionally, the mediating roles of system trust, as well as the moderating roles of tourism type and failure type, were analyzed. The research findings indicate that ego-moving trust repair can more effectively stimulate continuous interaction intention compared with event-moving trust repair, with system trust playing mediating roles in this influence process. Further analysis revealed that this effect is moderated by tourism type and failure type. Specifically, for leisure tourism, ego-moving trust repair is more likely to stimulate their continuous interaction intention through system trust. In contrast, for business tourism, event-moving trust repair is more effective. Moreover, when a information failure occurs, ego-moving trust repair is more likely to trigger continuous interaction intention through system trust. However, in the case of an system failure, the opposite is true. This study has linked the research on chatbots' trust repair and time metaphor, thereby providing a new perspective on how chatbots can conduct service recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 104437"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925002164","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of tourism, it is almost inevitable for chatbots to encounter service failures. After a chatbot experiences a service failure, how to conduct effective service recovery is crucial for retaining consumers. Whether a chatbot can enhance continuous interaction intention by enabling customers to envision the time-course of successful service remains unknown. This study aims to discuss the different impacts of chatbots' trust repair, namely ego-moving and event-moving on continuous interaction intention. Three studies were conducted in the study to examine the impact of chatbots' trust repair on continuous interaction intention. Additionally, the mediating roles of system trust, as well as the moderating roles of tourism type and failure type, were analyzed. The research findings indicate that ego-moving trust repair can more effectively stimulate continuous interaction intention compared with event-moving trust repair, with system trust playing mediating roles in this influence process. Further analysis revealed that this effect is moderated by tourism type and failure type. Specifically, for leisure tourism, ego-moving trust repair is more likely to stimulate their continuous interaction intention through system trust. In contrast, for business tourism, event-moving trust repair is more effective. Moreover, when a information failure occurs, ego-moving trust repair is more likely to trigger continuous interaction intention through system trust. However, in the case of an system failure, the opposite is true. This study has linked the research on chatbots' trust repair and time metaphor, thereby providing a new perspective on how chatbots can conduct service recovery.
想象未来能修复信任吗?服务故障时聊天机器人信任修复对持续交互意愿的影响
在旅游领域,聊天机器人遇到服务故障几乎是不可避免的。聊天机器人出现服务故障后,如何进行有效的服务恢复是留住客户的关键。聊天机器人是否能够通过让客户设想成功服务的时间过程来增强持续的交互意图,目前还不得而知。本研究旨在探讨聊天机器人的信任修复,即自我移动和事件移动对持续交互意愿的不同影响。研究中进行了三项研究,以检验聊天机器人的信任修复对持续交互意图的影响。分析了系统信任的中介作用,以及旅游类型和失效类型的调节作用。研究发现,自我移动信任修复比事件移动信任修复能更有效地激发持续互动意愿,系统信任在这一影响过程中起中介作用。进一步分析表明,旅游类型和失效类型对这种影响有调节作用。具体而言,对于休闲旅游而言,自我移动信任修复更有可能通过系统信任激发其持续互动意愿。相比之下,对于商务旅游而言,事件移动信任修复更为有效。此外,当发生信息失效时,自我移动的信任修复更有可能通过系统信任触发持续的交互意图。然而,在系统故障的情况下,情况正好相反。本研究将聊天机器人的信任修复研究与时间隐喻联系起来,从而为聊天机器人如何进行服务恢复提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信