Adverse Event Reporting in Exercise Studies of Resistance Training (AERIES-RT) Recommendations and Toolkit: A modified Delphi process.

Rasha El-Kotob, Justin Rodriguez Pagcanlungan, B Catharine Craven, Catherine Sherrington, Marina Mourtzakis, Lora Giangregorio
{"title":"Adverse Event Reporting in Exercise Studies of Resistance Training (AERIES-RT) Recommendations and Toolkit: A modified Delphi process.","authors":"Rasha El-Kotob, Justin Rodriguez Pagcanlungan, B Catharine Craven, Catherine Sherrington, Marina Mourtzakis, Lora Giangregorio","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to adapt existing adverse event (AE) reporting guidelines and develop AE Reporting In Exercise Studies of Resistance Training (AERIES-RT) recommendations and toolkit. We conducted purposeful and convenience sampling to identify researchers who published resistance training (RT) trials. We invited 80 research scientists to participate in a modified Delphi consensus process. Nineteen researchers from six countries (Canada, USA, UK, Australia, Greece, and Puerto Rico) agreed to participate. We drafted adapted AE-reporting recommendations informed by interviewing participants with common health conditions who experienced AEs after RT (n=12), and researchers who published RT trials (n=14). These recommendations were turned into a survey that was distributed electronically to the Delphi participants for rating. We conducted three rounds of voting until there was consensus (criterion: minimum 74% agreement) on each recommendation. All 19 participants responded to the three survey rounds (100% response rate). After each round, the recommendations were revised based on the participants' feedback. For the first round, ten of 24 recommendations did not meet the criterion for consensus. For the second round, one of 28 recommendations did not meet the criterion for consensus. For the final round, the remaining recommendation met the criterion for consensus. The agreed upon recommendations were used to develop the AERIES-RT toolkit including a checklist, template AE reporting form, and a decision tree. Our modified e-Delphi consensus process resulted in developing the AERIES-RT toolkit that researchers can use to improve the frequency and accuracy of AE reporting in RT trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to adapt existing adverse event (AE) reporting guidelines and develop AE Reporting In Exercise Studies of Resistance Training (AERIES-RT) recommendations and toolkit. We conducted purposeful and convenience sampling to identify researchers who published resistance training (RT) trials. We invited 80 research scientists to participate in a modified Delphi consensus process. Nineteen researchers from six countries (Canada, USA, UK, Australia, Greece, and Puerto Rico) agreed to participate. We drafted adapted AE-reporting recommendations informed by interviewing participants with common health conditions who experienced AEs after RT (n=12), and researchers who published RT trials (n=14). These recommendations were turned into a survey that was distributed electronically to the Delphi participants for rating. We conducted three rounds of voting until there was consensus (criterion: minimum 74% agreement) on each recommendation. All 19 participants responded to the three survey rounds (100% response rate). After each round, the recommendations were revised based on the participants' feedback. For the first round, ten of 24 recommendations did not meet the criterion for consensus. For the second round, one of 28 recommendations did not meet the criterion for consensus. For the final round, the remaining recommendation met the criterion for consensus. The agreed upon recommendations were used to develop the AERIES-RT toolkit including a checklist, template AE reporting form, and a decision tree. Our modified e-Delphi consensus process resulted in developing the AERIES-RT toolkit that researchers can use to improve the frequency and accuracy of AE reporting in RT trials.

阻力训练运动研究中的不良事件报告(AERIES-RT)建议和工具包:改进的德尔菲过程。
本研究的目的是调整现有的不良事件(AE)报告指南,并制定阻力训练运动研究中的AE报告(AERIES-RT)建议和工具包。我们进行了有目的和方便的抽样,以确定发表阻力训练(RT)试验的研究人员。我们邀请了80位研究科学家参与一个改进的德尔菲共识过程。来自六个国家(加拿大、美国、英国、澳大利亚、希腊和波多黎各)的19名研究人员同意参与。我们通过采访在放疗后出现ae的常见健康状况的参与者(n=12)和发表了RT试验的研究人员(n=14),起草了适应的ae报告建议。这些建议被转化成一份调查,以电子方式分发给德尔福参与者进行评级。我们进行了三轮投票,直到对每项建议达成共识(标准:至少74%的同意)。所有19名参与者都回答了三轮调查(100%的回复率)。每一轮之后,都会根据参与者的反馈对建议进行修改。在第一轮中,24项建议中有10项没有达到协商一致的标准。对于第二轮,28项建议中有一项没有达到协商一致的标准。对于最后一轮,剩下的建议符合协商一致的标准。商定的建议用于开发AERIES-RT工具包,包括检查表、AE报告表格模板和决策树。我们修改了e-Delphi共识过程,开发了AERIES-RT工具包,研究人员可以使用该工具包来提高RT试验中AE报告的频率和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信