Risk Factors for Epidural Hematoma Expansion and the Need for Surgery.

Mahla Radmard, Luke Miller, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Shahram Hadidchi, Joyce Hsu, Jee Moon, Samuel Speer, David M Yousem, Caline Azzi
{"title":"Risk Factors for Epidural Hematoma Expansion and the Need for Surgery.","authors":"Mahla Radmard, Luke Miller, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Shahram Hadidchi, Joyce Hsu, Jee Moon, Samuel Speer, David M Yousem, Caline Azzi","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The use of head CT in trauma settings has increased significantly, driven by the need to detect and monitor intracranial hemorrhages. Among intracranial hemorrhage subtypes, epidural hematomas (EDHs) are relatively uncommon but require careful evaluation due to their potential for expansion and the need for surgical intervention. This study aimed to identify risk factors for initial EDH size, subsequent enlargement, and the need for surgical intervention to guide imaging and treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 32,401 noncontrast head CT reports from 2 trauma centers (The Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center) between 2018 and 2024. Patients with EDHs were identified using a structured search of radiology reports. Clinical, demographic, and imaging characteristics were analyzed to assess the predictors of EDH enlargement and the need for surgery. Statistical analyses included the χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 91 cases of EDH, a larger initial EDH size was associated with arterial bleeding sources, mixed attenuation, and the spot sign. These same factors, plus a midline shift, predicted the need for initial surgery. No clinical features or comorbidities predicted a larger EDH. Follow-up imaging revealed EDH enlargement in 25/89 cases (28.1%), with SAH as the only significant predictor (OR = 2.60; 95% CI, 1.00-6.77; <i>P</i> = .05). The scans that demonstrated EDH enlargement were performed after a mean of 6.6 (SD 3.3) hours. Ultimately, 25/91 (27.5%) EDHs required surgical intervention; only EDH enlargement was predictive of the need for follow-up surgery after initial observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of concurrent SAH was the strongest predictor of EDH enlargement, and radiologists should recommend short-term monitoring of patients with EDH and SAH. Repeat CT at 6-13 hours will detect nearly all cases of EDH enlargement, which may lead to subsequent surgery. Initial large size, midline shift, arterial sources of bleeds, and active bleeding imaging findings correlated with an early surgical intervention. Future multicenter studies are needed to refine risk stratification and optimize imaging follow-up to balance patient safety and health care resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The use of head CT in trauma settings has increased significantly, driven by the need to detect and monitor intracranial hemorrhages. Among intracranial hemorrhage subtypes, epidural hematomas (EDHs) are relatively uncommon but require careful evaluation due to their potential for expansion and the need for surgical intervention. This study aimed to identify risk factors for initial EDH size, subsequent enlargement, and the need for surgical intervention to guide imaging and treatment strategies.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 32,401 noncontrast head CT reports from 2 trauma centers (The Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center) between 2018 and 2024. Patients with EDHs were identified using a structured search of radiology reports. Clinical, demographic, and imaging characteristics were analyzed to assess the predictors of EDH enlargement and the need for surgery. Statistical analyses included the χ2 or Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among 91 cases of EDH, a larger initial EDH size was associated with arterial bleeding sources, mixed attenuation, and the spot sign. These same factors, plus a midline shift, predicted the need for initial surgery. No clinical features or comorbidities predicted a larger EDH. Follow-up imaging revealed EDH enlargement in 25/89 cases (28.1%), with SAH as the only significant predictor (OR = 2.60; 95% CI, 1.00-6.77; P = .05). The scans that demonstrated EDH enlargement were performed after a mean of 6.6 (SD 3.3) hours. Ultimately, 25/91 (27.5%) EDHs required surgical intervention; only EDH enlargement was predictive of the need for follow-up surgery after initial observation.

Conclusions: The presence of concurrent SAH was the strongest predictor of EDH enlargement, and radiologists should recommend short-term monitoring of patients with EDH and SAH. Repeat CT at 6-13 hours will detect nearly all cases of EDH enlargement, which may lead to subsequent surgery. Initial large size, midline shift, arterial sources of bleeds, and active bleeding imaging findings correlated with an early surgical intervention. Future multicenter studies are needed to refine risk stratification and optimize imaging follow-up to balance patient safety and health care resource use.

硬膜外血肿扩张的危险因素及手术的必要性。
背景和目的:由于需要检测和监测颅内出血,头部CT在创伤环境中的应用显著增加。在颅内出血亚型中,硬膜外血肿(EDHs)相对罕见,但由于其扩张的潜力和手术干预的需要,需要仔细评估。本研究旨在确定初始EDH大小、随后扩大的危险因素,以及手术干预的必要性,以指导成像和治疗策略。材料和方法:我们对2018年至2024年间来自两个创伤中心(约翰霍普金斯医院和约翰霍普金斯湾景医疗中心)的32401例非对比头部CT报告进行了回顾性分析。EDHs患者是通过对放射学报告的结构化搜索来确定的。分析临床、人口统计学和影像学特征,以评估EDH扩大的预测因素和手术的必要性。统计分析采用χ2或Fisher精确检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis H检验和logistic回归分析。结果:91例EDH患者中,EDH初始大小较大与动脉出血来源、混合衰减、斑点征象相关。这些相同的因素,加上中线移位,预示着需要进行初始手术。没有临床特征或合并症预测较大的EDH。随访影像显示25/89例(28.1%)EDH增大,SAH是唯一显著的预测因子(OR = 2.60;95% ci, 1.00-6.77;P = 0.05)。显示EDH增大的扫描平均在6.6 (SD 3.3)小时后进行。最终,25/91(27.5%)的EDHs需要手术干预;初步观察后,只有EDH增大预示需要后续手术。结论:并发SAH的存在是EDH增大的最强预测因子,放射科医生应建议对EDH和SAH患者进行短期监测。在6-13小时重复CT可以发现几乎所有EDH增大的病例,这可能导致后续手术。初始大尺寸、中线移位、动脉出血源和活动性出血影像学发现与早期手术干预相关。未来的多中心研究需要完善风险分层和优化影像学随访,以平衡患者安全和卫生保健资源的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信