Revolutionizing Postdoctoral Training Using the Social Ecological Model: Insights and Experiences from the Propel Scholars.

IF 2 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
GEN biotechnology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1089/genbio.2024.0014
Cellas A Hayes, Colwyn A Headley, Amy R Nava, Edward A Vizcarra, Keith C Garcia, McKay M S Mullen, Josefina Flores Morales, Anthony C Venida, Shawna Follis
{"title":"Revolutionizing Postdoctoral Training Using the Social Ecological Model: Insights and Experiences from the Propel Scholars.","authors":"Cellas A Hayes, Colwyn A Headley, Amy R Nava, Edward A Vizcarra, Keith C Garcia, McKay M S Mullen, Josefina Flores Morales, Anthony C Venida, Shawna Follis","doi":"10.1089/genbio.2024.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dissatisfaction within the postdoctoral training phase has led to the drastic reduction in the number of U.S. citizens pursuing postdoctoral positions within the biological and biomedical sciences fields. Even more so, there is an obvious disparity in not only the recruitment but the retention among underrepresented groups to pursue careers as academic scientists. The proposed social-ecological model and National Institute of Health advisory committee suggests reforming the postdoctoral training phase to overcome these downward trends and disparities. Importantly, some programs like the Stanford Propel Postdoctoral Program were integrating this framework and recommendations without knowledge that they would be released 2 years later. The goal of the Propel Program is to provide social, cohort, financial, and institutional support to diverse cohorts of postdoctoral trainee to diversify the professoriate. Within this piece, several of the Propel scholars come together to provide their perspectives on how the Propel Program has benefited their postdoctoral training experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":73134,"journal":{"name":"GEN biotechnology","volume":"3 4","pages":"196-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEN biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/genbio.2024.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dissatisfaction within the postdoctoral training phase has led to the drastic reduction in the number of U.S. citizens pursuing postdoctoral positions within the biological and biomedical sciences fields. Even more so, there is an obvious disparity in not only the recruitment but the retention among underrepresented groups to pursue careers as academic scientists. The proposed social-ecological model and National Institute of Health advisory committee suggests reforming the postdoctoral training phase to overcome these downward trends and disparities. Importantly, some programs like the Stanford Propel Postdoctoral Program were integrating this framework and recommendations without knowledge that they would be released 2 years later. The goal of the Propel Program is to provide social, cohort, financial, and institutional support to diverse cohorts of postdoctoral trainee to diversify the professoriate. Within this piece, several of the Propel scholars come together to provide their perspectives on how the Propel Program has benefited their postdoctoral training experience.

利用社会生态模式革新博士后培养:推进学者的见解与经验。
对博士后培养阶段的不满导致在生物和生物医学科学领域寻求博士后职位的美国公民数量急剧减少。更重要的是,不仅在招聘方面,而且在代表性不足的群体中,追求学术科学家职业的人数也存在明显的差异。拟议的社会生态模式和国立卫生研究院咨询委员会建议改革博士后培训阶段,以克服这些下降趋势和差距。重要的是,一些项目,如斯坦福大学的推进博士后项目,在不知道这些框架和建议将在两年后发布的情况下,整合了这个框架和建议。推进计划的目标是为不同的博士后培训生群体提供社会、群体、财务和制度支持,以使教授多样化。在这篇文章中,几位Propel学者聚集在一起,就Propel项目如何使他们的博士后培训经历受益提供了他们的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信