Simultaneous versus sequential refractive correction and occlusion therapy in treatment of amblyopia.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shivani Kumari, Vaishali Tomar, Subhash Dadeya, Pranita Sahay, Mittali Khurana
{"title":"Simultaneous versus sequential refractive correction and occlusion therapy in treatment of amblyopia.","authors":"Shivani Kumari, Vaishali Tomar, Subhash Dadeya, Pranita Sahay, Mittali Khurana","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2537361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental disorder of vision with various treatment modalities available for treatment. This study was conducted to compare visual outcomes and stereoacuity in sequential and simultaneous refractive correction and patching in treatment of amblyopia. <i>Materials and methods</i>: A prospective randomized interventional study was conducted in age group 3-14 years with unilateral mild-to-moderate amblyopia in two groups (total 70 patients, 35 each) over a period of 1 year. Group A patients underwent simultaneous treatment and Group B patients underwent sequential treatment. Follow-up data for distant and near best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and stereopsis was taken at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks. <i>Results</i>: At final follow-up, the mean distant BCVA in amblyopic eye was 0.35LogMAReq (SD - 0.14) and 0.33LogMAReq (SD - 0.15) in Group A and Group B, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between both groups (<i>p</i> = .58). At final follow-up, there was a significant improvement in mean near BCVA in amblyopic eye in both the groups (<i>p</i>, Group A < .01, Group B < .01) with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i> = .93). The mean stereoacuity at final follow-up was 512.3 arc secs and 165.74 arc secs in Group A and Group B, respectively. The median (IQR) stereoacuity at final follow-up was 200 (300) and 100 (137) for Group A and Group B, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .01) at 9 weeks and (<i>p</i> < .01) at 12 weeks. For intergroup comparison, while the difference in stereoacuity was not statistically different comparing anisometropia amblyopia subtype (<i>p</i> = .95), there was a statistically significant difference in stereoacuity at final follow-up for strabismic amblyopia (<i>p</i> = .04), with Group B having better stereoacuity. <i>Conclusion</i>: It is concluded that there is no significant difference between simultaneous and sequential group for BCVA, however sequential group yields better stereopsis as compared to simultaneous group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2537361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental disorder of vision with various treatment modalities available for treatment. This study was conducted to compare visual outcomes and stereoacuity in sequential and simultaneous refractive correction and patching in treatment of amblyopia. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized interventional study was conducted in age group 3-14 years with unilateral mild-to-moderate amblyopia in two groups (total 70 patients, 35 each) over a period of 1 year. Group A patients underwent simultaneous treatment and Group B patients underwent sequential treatment. Follow-up data for distant and near best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and stereopsis was taken at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks. Results: At final follow-up, the mean distant BCVA in amblyopic eye was 0.35LogMAReq (SD - 0.14) and 0.33LogMAReq (SD - 0.15) in Group A and Group B, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between both groups (p = .58). At final follow-up, there was a significant improvement in mean near BCVA in amblyopic eye in both the groups (p, Group A < .01, Group B < .01) with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = .93). The mean stereoacuity at final follow-up was 512.3 arc secs and 165.74 arc secs in Group A and Group B, respectively. The median (IQR) stereoacuity at final follow-up was 200 (300) and 100 (137) for Group A and Group B, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = .01) at 9 weeks and (p < .01) at 12 weeks. For intergroup comparison, while the difference in stereoacuity was not statistically different comparing anisometropia amblyopia subtype (p = .95), there was a statistically significant difference in stereoacuity at final follow-up for strabismic amblyopia (p = .04), with Group B having better stereoacuity. Conclusion: It is concluded that there is no significant difference between simultaneous and sequential group for BCVA, however sequential group yields better stereopsis as compared to simultaneous group.

同时与顺序屈光矫正和遮挡治疗弱视。
背景:弱视是一种视力的神经发育障碍,有多种治疗方法可供治疗。本研究比较了顺序和同步屈光矫正和配片治疗弱视的视觉效果和立体视力。材料与方法:对3-14岁单侧轻中度弱视患者分为两组,共70例,每组35例,为期1年的前瞻性随机介入研究。A组患者同时治疗,B组患者依次治疗。分别在基线、1周、6周、9周和12周随访远、近最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和立体视觉。结果:末次随访时,A组和B组弱视眼远端BCVA均值分别为0.35LogMAReq (SD - 0.14)和0.33LogMAReq (SD - 0.15),两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.58)。最后随访时,两组弱视眼平均近BCVA均有显著改善(p, a组p = 0.93)。最后随访时,A组和B组的平均立体视力分别为512.3角秒和165.74角秒。最后随访时,A组和B组的中位立体视锐度分别为200(300)和100(137)。两组患者在第9周时的立体视敏度差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01),在最后随访时的立体视敏度差异有统计学意义(p = 0.95),其中B组患者的立体视敏度更好。结论:同时组与顺序组对BCVA的立体视效果无显著性差异,但顺序组立体视效果优于同时组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信