Verbal Mediation During Auditory Equivalence Class Formation Using Go/No-Go Successive Matching-to-Sample.

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Analysis of Verbal Behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40616-024-00209-3
Charles S Dingus, Robbie J Hanson, Caio F Miguel, Sydney Stern, Denys Brand
{"title":"Verbal Mediation During Auditory Equivalence Class Formation Using Go/No-Go Successive Matching-to-Sample.","authors":"Charles S Dingus, Robbie J Hanson, Caio F Miguel, Sydney Stern, Denys Brand","doi":"10.1007/s40616-024-00209-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successive matching-to-sample (S-MTS) with a go/no-go response requirement has previously produced equivalence classes with nonverbal auditory stimuli among college students. When participants are required to talk aloud during posttests (protocol analysis), their verbal behavior tends to match their selection performance. However, in some cases, the protocol analysis seems to interfere with posttests, in that equivalence yields are lower when participants are required to talk aloud. Thus, the current study replicated and extended previous research by requiring participants to complete emergence posttests before introducing training for the protocol analysis. Subsequently, participants completed one additional block of the transitivity/equivalence posttest with the talk-aloud requirement. Additionally, participants completed tact and intraverbal tests following emergence posttests to further assess possible verbal-mediation strategies. The results showed that six of eight college students formed equivalence classes, suggesting that previous failures could have been influenced by the talk-aloud requirement. Further, there was a positive correlation between verbal and nonverbal (selection) responses suggesting the possibility that verbal mediation may have contributed to equivalence-class formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51684,"journal":{"name":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","volume":"41 1","pages":"11-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-024-00209-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successive matching-to-sample (S-MTS) with a go/no-go response requirement has previously produced equivalence classes with nonverbal auditory stimuli among college students. When participants are required to talk aloud during posttests (protocol analysis), their verbal behavior tends to match their selection performance. However, in some cases, the protocol analysis seems to interfere with posttests, in that equivalence yields are lower when participants are required to talk aloud. Thus, the current study replicated and extended previous research by requiring participants to complete emergence posttests before introducing training for the protocol analysis. Subsequently, participants completed one additional block of the transitivity/equivalence posttest with the talk-aloud requirement. Additionally, participants completed tact and intraverbal tests following emergence posttests to further assess possible verbal-mediation strategies. The results showed that six of eight college students formed equivalence classes, suggesting that previous failures could have been influenced by the talk-aloud requirement. Further, there was a positive correlation between verbal and nonverbal (selection) responses suggesting the possibility that verbal mediation may have contributed to equivalence-class formation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用Go/No-Go连续匹配样本的听觉对等类形成中的言语中介。
在非语言听觉刺激条件下,连续匹配样本(S-MTS)已经在大学生中产生了等效类。当参与者在后测试(协议分析)中被要求大声说话时,他们的言语行为倾向于与他们的选择表现相匹配。然而,在某些情况下,协议分析似乎会干扰后测,因为当参与者被要求大声说话时,等效率会降低。因此,本研究复制并扩展了先前的研究,要求参与者在引入方案分析培训之前完成紧急情况后测试。随后,参与者完成了一个附加的及物性/等效性后测,并要求大声说话。此外,参与者在紧急后处理测试后完成机智和言语内测试,以进一步评估可能的言语调解策略。结果显示,8名大学生中有6人组成了对等班级,这表明之前的失败可能受到大声说话要求的影响。此外,言语和非言语(选择)反应之间存在正相关,表明言语调解可能有助于等效类的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Analysis of Verbal Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (TAVB) is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International.  The Mission of the journal is to support the dissemination of innovative empirical research, theoretical conceptualizations, and real-world applications of the behavioral science of language. The journal embraces diverse perspectives of human language, its conceptual underpinnings, and the utility such diversity affords. TAVB values contributions that represent the scope of field and breadth of populations behavior analysts serve, and Is the premier publication outlet that fosters increased dialogue between scientists and scientist-practitioners.  Articles addressing the following topics are encouraged: language acquisition, verbal operants, relational frames, naming, rule-governed behavior, epistemology, language assessment and training, bilingualism, verbal behavior of nonhumans, research methodology, or any other topic that addresses the analysis of language from a behavior analytic perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信