Acquisition of Secondary Targets During Tact and Intraverbal Instruction With Instructive Feedback.

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Analysis of Verbal Behavior Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z
Breanna K Anderson, Katie M Wiskow
{"title":"Acquisition of Secondary Targets During Tact and Intraverbal Instruction With Instructive Feedback.","authors":"Breanna K Anderson, Katie M Wiskow","doi":"10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Instructive feedback is a procedure that introduces additional stimuli before or after a learning trial and can result in the acquisition of stimuli not directly taught. Further research may help us better understand the conditions under which instructive feedback is effective and preferred. In the present study, the experimenters presented intraverbal instructive feedback during tact and intraverbal teaching and compared the rate of acquisition for primary and secondary targets with a 6-year-old autistic child. The experimenters evaluated preference for learning method with a concurrent-chains procedure. Finally, the experimenters measured the frequency of echoics during teaching sessions. The tact and intraverbal conditions resulted in similar acquisition of primary and secondary targets, and the participant reported a preference for the tact condition. Further, there was initially a higher frequency of echoics to the primary target. As acquisition increased toward mastery, there were fewer echoics to the primary target and higher echoics to the secondary target. These results suggest that overt echoic behavior may facilitate the acquisition of secondary targets for some learners and demonstrate how clinicians may provide the learner with a choice of teaching strategies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z.</p>","PeriodicalId":51684,"journal":{"name":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","volume":"41 1","pages":"40-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instructive feedback is a procedure that introduces additional stimuli before or after a learning trial and can result in the acquisition of stimuli not directly taught. Further research may help us better understand the conditions under which instructive feedback is effective and preferred. In the present study, the experimenters presented intraverbal instructive feedback during tact and intraverbal teaching and compared the rate of acquisition for primary and secondary targets with a 6-year-old autistic child. The experimenters evaluated preference for learning method with a concurrent-chains procedure. Finally, the experimenters measured the frequency of echoics during teaching sessions. The tact and intraverbal conditions resulted in similar acquisition of primary and secondary targets, and the participant reported a preference for the tact condition. Further, there was initially a higher frequency of echoics to the primary target. As acquisition increased toward mastery, there were fewer echoics to the primary target and higher echoics to the secondary target. These results suggest that overt echoic behavior may facilitate the acquisition of secondary targets for some learners and demonstrate how clinicians may provide the learner with a choice of teaching strategies.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z.

有指导性反馈的机智和语内教学中次要目标的习得。
指导性反馈是在学习试验之前或之后引入额外刺激的过程,可以导致获得没有直接教授的刺激。进一步的研究可以帮助我们更好地理解在哪些条件下指导性反馈是有效的和首选的。本研究以6岁自闭症儿童为研究对象,在机智教学和言语教学中引入语内指导反馈,并比较了其主要目标和次要目标的习得率。实验人员采用并行链程序评估学习方法的偏好。最后,实验人员在教学过程中测量了回声的频率。机智条件和言语内条件导致主要目标和次要目标的获得相似,并且参与者报告了对机智条件的偏好。此外,最初对主要目标的回声频率更高。当习得向掌握方向发展时,对第一目标的回声越少,对第二目标的回声越高。这些结果表明,明显的回声行为可能有助于一些学习者习得次要目标,并证明临床医生如何为学习者提供教学策略的选择。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址为10.1007/s40616-025-00215-z。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Analysis of Verbal Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (TAVB) is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International.  The Mission of the journal is to support the dissemination of innovative empirical research, theoretical conceptualizations, and real-world applications of the behavioral science of language. The journal embraces diverse perspectives of human language, its conceptual underpinnings, and the utility such diversity affords. TAVB values contributions that represent the scope of field and breadth of populations behavior analysts serve, and Is the premier publication outlet that fosters increased dialogue between scientists and scientist-practitioners.  Articles addressing the following topics are encouraged: language acquisition, verbal operants, relational frames, naming, rule-governed behavior, epistemology, language assessment and training, bilingualism, verbal behavior of nonhumans, research methodology, or any other topic that addresses the analysis of language from a behavior analytic perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信