A systematic scoping review of mentor training in medical education between 2000 and 2024.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jun Rey Leong, Adele Yi Dawn Lim, Nila Ravindran, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Varsha Rajalingam, Jun Kiat Lua, Hannah Yi Fang Kwok, Krish Sheri, Victoria Jia En Fam, Ranitha Govindasamy, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Michael Dunn, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
{"title":"A systematic scoping review of mentor training in medical education between 2000 and 2024.","authors":"Jun Rey Leong, Adele Yi Dawn Lim, Nila Ravindran, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Varsha Rajalingam, Jun Kiat Lua, Hannah Yi Fang Kwok, Krish Sheri, Victoria Jia En Fam, Ranitha Govindasamy, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Michael Dunn, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07353-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective mentoring in medical education facilitates professional development amongst mentees and mentors, improves patient care and outcomes, as well as advances the reputation of the host organisation. Much of this success is guided, assessed and overseen by the mentor. Yet, mentor training remains inconsistent, poorly supported and often inadequately evaluated. Acknowledging mentor training as an essential aspect of mentoring programs, we propose a review to map current features and approaches to mentor training with the hopes of boosting the effective design of a proposed mentoring program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL database searches were conducted for articles published between 1<sup>st</sup> January 2000 and 31<sup>st</sup> March 2024 on mentor training programs in medical education. This systematic scoping review was directed by a PRISMA-guided Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SSR in SEBA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1124 abstracts were reviewed, 63 full-text articles were appraised and 69 articles were included. Five key domains were identified: 1) mentor qualities, 2) training structure, 3) content, 4) outcomes, and 5) obstacles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This SSR in SEBA reiterates the critical role of mentor training and introduces evidence of its impact on the professional identity formation (PIF) of prospective mentors. It also highlights that more programs are employing longitudinal mentoring processes to guide the inculcation of desired mentoring characteristics amongst prospective mentors. These efforts to nurture the PIF of the prospective mentor-to better shape their future mentee's PIF-is novel and requires careful study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07353-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective mentoring in medical education facilitates professional development amongst mentees and mentors, improves patient care and outcomes, as well as advances the reputation of the host organisation. Much of this success is guided, assessed and overseen by the mentor. Yet, mentor training remains inconsistent, poorly supported and often inadequately evaluated. Acknowledging mentor training as an essential aspect of mentoring programs, we propose a review to map current features and approaches to mentor training with the hopes of boosting the effective design of a proposed mentoring program.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL database searches were conducted for articles published between 1st January 2000 and 31st March 2024 on mentor training programs in medical education. This systematic scoping review was directed by a PRISMA-guided Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SSR in SEBA).

Results: A total of 1124 abstracts were reviewed, 63 full-text articles were appraised and 69 articles were included. Five key domains were identified: 1) mentor qualities, 2) training structure, 3) content, 4) outcomes, and 5) obstacles.

Conclusion: This SSR in SEBA reiterates the critical role of mentor training and introduces evidence of its impact on the professional identity formation (PIF) of prospective mentors. It also highlights that more programs are employing longitudinal mentoring processes to guide the inculcation of desired mentoring characteristics amongst prospective mentors. These efforts to nurture the PIF of the prospective mentor-to better shape their future mentee's PIF-is novel and requires careful study.

2000年至2024年间医学教育导师培训的系统范围审查。
背景:医学教育中有效的指导有助于学员和导师之间的专业发展,改善患者护理和结果,并提高主办组织的声誉。这些成功大多是由导师指导、评估和监督的。然而,对导师的培训仍然不一致,缺乏支持,而且往往评价不充分。认识到导师培训是指导计划的一个重要方面,我们提出了一项回顾,以映射当前的特点和导师培训的方法,希望促进所提议的指导计划的有效设计。方法:检索2000年1月1日至2024年3月31日在PubMed、Scopus、Embase、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库中发表的有关医学教育导师培训项目的文章。该系统的范围审查由prisma指导的基于系统证据的方法(SEBA中的SSR)指导。结果:共审阅摘要1124篇,评价全文63篇,纳入69篇。确定了五个关键领域:1)导师素质,2)培训结构,3)内容,4)结果,5)障碍。结论:SEBA中的SSR重申了导师培训的关键作用,并介绍了其对未来导师职业认同形成(PIF)影响的证据。它还强调,越来越多的项目正在采用纵向指导过程来指导在潜在导师中灌输所需的指导特征。这些培养未来导师的PIF的努力——更好地塑造他们未来学员的PIF——是新颖的,需要仔细研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信