Methinks AI software for identifying large vessel occlusion in non-contrast head CT: A pilot retrospective study in American population.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
João Victor Sanders, Kiffon Keigher, Marion Oliver, Krishna Joshi, Demetrius Lopes
{"title":"Methinks AI software for identifying large vessel occlusion in non-contrast head CT: A pilot retrospective study in American population.","authors":"João Victor Sanders, Kiffon Keigher, Marion Oliver, Krishna Joshi, Demetrius Lopes","doi":"10.1177/15910199251362073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNon-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is the first image for stroke assessment, but its sensitivity for detecting large vessel occlusion (LVO) is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms may contribute to a faster LVO diagnosis using only NCCT. This study evaluates the performance and the potential diagnostic time saving of Methinks LVO AI algorithm in a U.S. multi-facility stroke network.MethodsThis retrospective pilot study reviewed NCCT and computed tomography angiography (CTA) images between 2015 and 2023. The Methinks AI algorithm, designed to detect LVOs in the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery, was tested for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A neuroradiologist reviewed cases to establish a gold standard. To evaluate potential time saving in workflow, time gaps between NCCT and CTA were analyzed and stratified into four groups in true positive cases: Group 1 (<10 min), Group 2 (10-30 min), Group 3 (30-60 min), and Group 4 (>60 min).ResultsFrom a total of 1155 stroke codes, 608 NCCT exams were analyzed. Methinks LVO demonstrated 75% sensitivity and 83% specificity, identifying 146 out of 194 confirmed LVO cases correctly. The PPV of the algorithm was 72%. The NPV was 83% (considering 'other occlusion', 'stenosis' and 'posteriors' as negatives), and 73% considered the same conditions as positives. Among the true positive cases, we found 112 patients Group 1, 32 patients in Group 2, 15 patients in Group 3, 3 patients in Group 4.ConclusionThe Methinks AI algorithm shows promise for improving LVO detection from NCCT, especially in resource limited settings. However, its sensitivity remains lower than CTA-based systems, suggesting the need for further refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251362073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251362073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNon-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is the first image for stroke assessment, but its sensitivity for detecting large vessel occlusion (LVO) is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms may contribute to a faster LVO diagnosis using only NCCT. This study evaluates the performance and the potential diagnostic time saving of Methinks LVO AI algorithm in a U.S. multi-facility stroke network.MethodsThis retrospective pilot study reviewed NCCT and computed tomography angiography (CTA) images between 2015 and 2023. The Methinks AI algorithm, designed to detect LVOs in the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery, was tested for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A neuroradiologist reviewed cases to establish a gold standard. To evaluate potential time saving in workflow, time gaps between NCCT and CTA were analyzed and stratified into four groups in true positive cases: Group 1 (<10 min), Group 2 (10-30 min), Group 3 (30-60 min), and Group 4 (>60 min).ResultsFrom a total of 1155 stroke codes, 608 NCCT exams were analyzed. Methinks LVO demonstrated 75% sensitivity and 83% specificity, identifying 146 out of 194 confirmed LVO cases correctly. The PPV of the algorithm was 72%. The NPV was 83% (considering 'other occlusion', 'stenosis' and 'posteriors' as negatives), and 73% considered the same conditions as positives. Among the true positive cases, we found 112 patients Group 1, 32 patients in Group 2, 15 patients in Group 3, 3 patients in Group 4.ConclusionThe Methinks AI algorithm shows promise for improving LVO detection from NCCT, especially in resource limited settings. However, its sensitivity remains lower than CTA-based systems, suggesting the need for further refinement.

methink人工智能软件在非对比头部CT中识别大血管闭塞:美国人群的试点回顾性研究。
非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)是脑卒中评估的首选图像,但其检测大血管闭塞(LVO)的灵敏度有限。人工智能(AI)算法可能有助于仅使用NCCT进行更快的LVO诊断。本研究评估了Methinks LVO AI算法在美国多设施卒中网络中的性能和潜在的诊断时间节省。方法本回顾性初步研究回顾了2015年至2023年间的NCCT和CTA图像。Methinks人工智能算法旨在检测颈内动脉和大脑中动脉的lvo,并对其敏感性、特异性和预测值进行了测试。一位神经放射学家回顾了病例,建立了一个黄金标准。为了评估在工作流程中可能节省的时间,分析了NCCT和CTA之间的时间间隔,并将真阳性病例分为四组:第一组(60分钟)。结果共从1155个笔划代码中分析了608个NCCT考试。我认为LVO具有75%的敏感性和83%的特异性,正确识别了194例LVO确诊病例中的146例。该算法的PPV为72%。NPV为83%(考虑“其他闭塞”、“狭窄”和“后位”为阴性),73%认为相同情况为阳性。在真阳性病例中,1组112例,2组32例,3组15例,4组3例。Methinks人工智能算法有望改善NCCT的LVO检测,特别是在资源有限的情况下。然而,它的灵敏度仍然低于基于cta的系统,表明需要进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信