Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Content Validity of a Modified Italian Version of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for ICU Patients.
{"title":"Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Content Validity of a Modified Italian Version of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for ICU Patients.","authors":"Chiara Rollo, Daniela Magnani, Sara Alberti, Brigitta Fazzini, Sergio Rovesti, Paola Ferri","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15070256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The Jackson/Cubbin scale is a recommended tool to assess the risk of pressure injury in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This scale is deemed to have superior predictive validity compared to the Braden scale. Many Italian nurses struggle with reading and applying the tool in English. This language barrier results in a lack of use of the Jackson/Cubbin scale clinically, meaning that patients potentially experience worse outcomes. This study aims to translate the original English version of the Jackson/Cubbin scale into the Italian language, conduct a cultural adaptation, and verify its content validity. <b>Methods</b>: An observational study was conducted using Beaton's five-step methodology: (1) forward translation, (2) synthesis, (3) back-translation, (4) expert committee approval using Fleiss' Kappa (κ) index, and (5) pre-testing, where participants assessed item clarity on a dichotomous scale (clear/unclear). Items deemed unclear by 20% or more of the sample were revised. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). <b>Results</b>: Fleiss' κ index was 0.74. Item 3 \"PMH-affecting condition\" was unclear to 36% of the sample and required revision. The item-level CVI (I-CVI) was >0.78 for each item. The scale-level CVI (S-CVI) and the scale-level CVI using the average method (S-CVI-Ave) were 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: The translation process resulted in a linguistically accurate scale requiring content modifications to reflect current evidence and reduce inter-rater variability. This may improve implementation of the Jackson/Cubbin scale in clinical practice for Italian nurses and reduce the incidence of pressure injury for ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12300118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15070256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The Jackson/Cubbin scale is a recommended tool to assess the risk of pressure injury in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This scale is deemed to have superior predictive validity compared to the Braden scale. Many Italian nurses struggle with reading and applying the tool in English. This language barrier results in a lack of use of the Jackson/Cubbin scale clinically, meaning that patients potentially experience worse outcomes. This study aims to translate the original English version of the Jackson/Cubbin scale into the Italian language, conduct a cultural adaptation, and verify its content validity. Methods: An observational study was conducted using Beaton's five-step methodology: (1) forward translation, (2) synthesis, (3) back-translation, (4) expert committee approval using Fleiss' Kappa (κ) index, and (5) pre-testing, where participants assessed item clarity on a dichotomous scale (clear/unclear). Items deemed unclear by 20% or more of the sample were revised. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: Fleiss' κ index was 0.74. Item 3 "PMH-affecting condition" was unclear to 36% of the sample and required revision. The item-level CVI (I-CVI) was >0.78 for each item. The scale-level CVI (S-CVI) and the scale-level CVI using the average method (S-CVI-Ave) were 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusions: The translation process resulted in a linguistically accurate scale requiring content modifications to reflect current evidence and reduce inter-rater variability. This may improve implementation of the Jackson/Cubbin scale in clinical practice for Italian nurses and reduce the incidence of pressure injury for ICU patients.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.