Geriatric Assessment as an Important Tool for Post-Hip Surgery Prognosis in Seniors.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Anca Iuliana Pîslaru, Irina Sîrbu, Sabinne-Marie Albișteanu, Ramona Ștefăniu, Ana-Maria Turcu, Gabriela Grigoraș, Iulia-Daniela Lungu, Roxana Maria Pînzaru, Ioana Dana Alexa, Adina Carmen Ilie
{"title":"Geriatric Assessment as an Important Tool for Post-Hip Surgery Prognosis in Seniors.","authors":"Anca Iuliana Pîslaru, Irina Sîrbu, Sabinne-Marie Albișteanu, Ramona Ștefăniu, Ana-Maria Turcu, Gabriela Grigoraș, Iulia-Daniela Lungu, Roxana Maria Pînzaru, Ioana Dana Alexa, Adina Carmen Ilie","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15070262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hip fractures in elderly patients pose significant clinical challenges, confronting us with high morbidity and mortality rates. A comprehensive geriatric assessment plays an important role in determining prognosis as well as the indication for surgery. <b>Aim</b>: In this study, we aim to (1) assess frailty-based functional status in seniors with hip fractures, (2) evaluate geriatric assessment's predictive value for postoperative recovery, and (3) analyze 1-year postoperative survival. <b>Material and Methods</b>: This prospective study included 60 senior patients admitted for hip fracture in the Orthopedics Department. Patients were examined using geriatric assessment instruments Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Frailty Groningen Indicator (GFI). We recorded the sex, marital status, number of comorbidities, and number of recommended drugs. <b>Results</b>: In total, 65% of patients were frail pre-surgery; the proportion increased post-surgery to 86.7%; (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Age greater than 80 years and unmarried marital status were associated with higher frailty risk (<i>p</i> = 0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.03). Preoperatively, important predictors of frailty were mild-moderate cognitive impairment (<i>p</i> = 0.017), mild-moderate depression (<i>p</i> = 0.01), and malnutrition (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Postoperatively, only mild-moderate cognitive impairment (<i>p</i> = 0.04) and mild-moderate depression (<i>p</i> = 0.01) proved to be important predictors of frailty. According to the ROC curve, good predictors of postoperative frailty were shown to be preoperative frailty and the degree of polypharmacy and comorbidity. Of all parameters predictive of postoperative frailty, only the number of medications reached statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.038). The study identified a 1-year all-cause mortality rate of 42.6% in elderly patients who underwent hip fracture surgery, with a significant association between mortality and preoperative MMSE, GDS, and MNA scores. <b>Conclusions</b>: Complex geriatric assessment of senior patients with hip fracture can stratify postoperative risk and predict 1-year mortality and postoperative functional recovery. Key predictors include cognitive status, depression, malnutrition, and comorbidities. Multidisciplinary care and standardized evaluation are essential for improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15070262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hip fractures in elderly patients pose significant clinical challenges, confronting us with high morbidity and mortality rates. A comprehensive geriatric assessment plays an important role in determining prognosis as well as the indication for surgery. Aim: In this study, we aim to (1) assess frailty-based functional status in seniors with hip fractures, (2) evaluate geriatric assessment's predictive value for postoperative recovery, and (3) analyze 1-year postoperative survival. Material and Methods: This prospective study included 60 senior patients admitted for hip fracture in the Orthopedics Department. Patients were examined using geriatric assessment instruments Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Frailty Groningen Indicator (GFI). We recorded the sex, marital status, number of comorbidities, and number of recommended drugs. Results: In total, 65% of patients were frail pre-surgery; the proportion increased post-surgery to 86.7%; (p = 0.005). Age greater than 80 years and unmarried marital status were associated with higher frailty risk (p = 0.04; p = 0.03). Preoperatively, important predictors of frailty were mild-moderate cognitive impairment (p = 0.017), mild-moderate depression (p = 0.01), and malnutrition (p = 0.04). Postoperatively, only mild-moderate cognitive impairment (p = 0.04) and mild-moderate depression (p = 0.01) proved to be important predictors of frailty. According to the ROC curve, good predictors of postoperative frailty were shown to be preoperative frailty and the degree of polypharmacy and comorbidity. Of all parameters predictive of postoperative frailty, only the number of medications reached statistical significance (p < 0.038). The study identified a 1-year all-cause mortality rate of 42.6% in elderly patients who underwent hip fracture surgery, with a significant association between mortality and preoperative MMSE, GDS, and MNA scores. Conclusions: Complex geriatric assessment of senior patients with hip fracture can stratify postoperative risk and predict 1-year mortality and postoperative functional recovery. Key predictors include cognitive status, depression, malnutrition, and comorbidities. Multidisciplinary care and standardized evaluation are essential for improving outcomes.

老年病学评估是老年人髋关节术后预后的重要工具。
老年髋部骨折患者的高发病率和高死亡率给我们带来了重大的临床挑战。全面的老年评估在确定预后和手术指征方面起着重要作用。目的:在本研究中,我们的目的是(1)评估老年髋部骨折患者基于衰弱的功能状态,(2)评估老年评估对术后恢复的预测价值,(3)分析术后1年生存率。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究纳入骨科收治的60例髋部骨折老年患者。采用老年评估工具迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、老年抑郁量表(GDS)、迷你营养评估(MNA)和衰弱格罗宁根指数(GFI)对患者进行检查。我们记录了患者的性别、婚姻状况、合并症数量和推荐用药数量。结果:65%的患者术前体弱;术后比例增加至86.7%;(p = 0.005)。年龄大于80岁和未婚婚姻状况与较高的衰弱风险相关(p = 0.04;P = 0.03)。术前,虚弱的重要预测因子是轻中度认知障碍(p = 0.017)、轻中度抑郁(p = 0.01)和营养不良(p = 0.04)。术后,只有轻中度认知障碍(p = 0.04)和轻中度抑郁(p = 0.01)被证明是虚弱的重要预测因素。根据ROC曲线,术前虚弱、多药及合并症程度是术后虚弱的良好预测指标。在所有预测术后虚弱的参数中,只有用药数量达到统计学意义(p < 0.038)。该研究发现,接受髋部骨折手术的老年患者1年全因死亡率为42.6%,死亡率与术前MMSE、GDS和MNA评分之间存在显著相关性。结论:对老年髋部骨折患者进行复杂的老年病学评估,可以对术后风险进行分层,预测1年死亡率和术后功能恢复情况。主要预测因素包括认知状态、抑郁、营养不良和合并症。多学科治疗和标准化评估对改善结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信