Effectiveness of Additional Preventive Measures for Pressure Injury Prevention in an Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Carolina Martín-Meana, José Manuel González-Darias, Carmen D Chinea-Rodríguez, María Del Cristo Robayna-Delgado, María Del Carmen Arroyo-López, Ángeles Arias-Rodríguez, Alejandro Jiménez-Sosa, Patricia Fariña-Martín
{"title":"Effectiveness of Additional Preventive Measures for Pressure Injury Prevention in an Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Carolina Martín-Meana, José Manuel González-Darias, Carmen D Chinea-Rodríguez, María Del Cristo Robayna-Delgado, María Del Carmen Arroyo-López, Ángeles Arias-Rodríguez, Alejandro Jiménez-Sosa, Patricia Fariña-Martín","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15070259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pressure injuries (PIs), a recognized indicator of care quality, have a higher incidence in intensive care units (ICUs). Our objective was to assess whether critically ill patients identified as \"unprotected\" (COMHON ≥ 11) developed pressure injuries despite additional preventive measures. <b>Methods:</b> A historical cohort study of an adult ICU was carried out. Of the 811 patients admitted in 2022, 400 were selected. All of them were subjected to the ICU's PI Prevention Protocol, and those with a moving average of the COMHON Index ≥ 11 were given two additional measures: a multilayer dressing on the sacrum, and anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots. <b>Results:</b> A total of 36 patients presented with PIs (cumulative incidence of 9%). Significant differences were observed in their mean length of stay and in their disease severity score (APACHE-II). Most of the PIs were located on the sacrum, followed by the heel. Prior to the appearance of the PIs, a sacral dressing was applied to 100% of the patients, while anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots were only applied to 58.3%. Of the 36 patients with PIs, 52.8% had a PI on the sacrum and 22.2% on the heel. <b>Conclusions:</b> Focusing only on those who presented with PIs, we observed that the considered measures were not effective for preventing PIs in all the patients. Not all PIs are preventable, and individual risk factors should be considered. In the future, we will analyze the individual characteristics of these patients and verify whether the Prevention Protocol was followed, in order to determine how they could have been prevented or whether they were so-called unavoidable PIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12298032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15070259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pressure injuries (PIs), a recognized indicator of care quality, have a higher incidence in intensive care units (ICUs). Our objective was to assess whether critically ill patients identified as "unprotected" (COMHON ≥ 11) developed pressure injuries despite additional preventive measures. Methods: A historical cohort study of an adult ICU was carried out. Of the 811 patients admitted in 2022, 400 were selected. All of them were subjected to the ICU's PI Prevention Protocol, and those with a moving average of the COMHON Index ≥ 11 were given two additional measures: a multilayer dressing on the sacrum, and anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots. Results: A total of 36 patients presented with PIs (cumulative incidence of 9%). Significant differences were observed in their mean length of stay and in their disease severity score (APACHE-II). Most of the PIs were located on the sacrum, followed by the heel. Prior to the appearance of the PIs, a sacral dressing was applied to 100% of the patients, while anti-equinus and heel-pressure-relieving boots were only applied to 58.3%. Of the 36 patients with PIs, 52.8% had a PI on the sacrum and 22.2% on the heel. Conclusions: Focusing only on those who presented with PIs, we observed that the considered measures were not effective for preventing PIs in all the patients. Not all PIs are preventable, and individual risk factors should be considered. In the future, we will analyze the individual characteristics of these patients and verify whether the Prevention Protocol was followed, in order to determine how they could have been prevented or whether they were so-called unavoidable PIs.

附加预防措施预防重症监护病房压力损伤的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景/目的:压伤(PIs)是一种公认的护理质量指标,在重症监护病房(icu)发生率较高。我们的目的是评估尽管采取了额外的预防措施,但被确定为“无保护”(COMHON≥11)的危重患者是否会发生压力损伤。方法:对一名成人ICU患者进行历史队列研究。在2022年收治的811名患者中,有400人入选。所有患者均接受ICU的PI预防方案,COMHON指数≥11的移动平均值患者给予两项额外措施:骶骨多层敷料,防马蹄和鞋跟减压靴。结果:共36例患者出现PIs,累计发生率为9%。在平均住院时间和疾病严重程度评分(APACHE-II)方面观察到显著差异。大多数pi位于骶骨,其次是脚跟。在pi出现之前,100%的患者使用了骶骨敷料,而防马蹄和足跟减压靴仅用于58.3%。在36例PI患者中,52.8%的PI位于骶骨,22.2%位于脚跟。结论:仅关注那些出现pi的患者,我们观察到所考虑的措施并不能有效地预防所有患者的pi。并非所有的pi都是可以预防的,个体的风险因素应该被考虑在内。在未来,我们将分析这些患者的个体特征,并验证是否遵循了预防方案,以确定他们是如何被预防的,或者他们是否是所谓的不可避免的pi。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信