Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Psychological Safety in High-Fidelity Simulation Scale (PS-HFS-J).

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Keisuke Nojima, Makoto Tsukuda, Kosuke Kawamura, Junko Honda, Mie Murozumi
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Psychological Safety in High-Fidelity Simulation Scale (PS-HFS-J).","authors":"Keisuke Nojima, Makoto Tsukuda, Kosuke Kawamura, Junko Honda, Mie Murozumi","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15070257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Psychological safety is essential for effective learning in high-fidelity simulation (HFS); however, no validated Japanese instrument currently exists to measure psychological safety among nursing students. This study aimed to translate the Psychological Safety in High-Fidelity Simulation (PS-HFS) scale into Japanese (PS-HFS-J) and evaluate its psychometric properties. <b>Methods</b>: Following COSMIN guidelines, the PS-HFS was translated through forward and back translation, reviewed by an expert panel, and tested for face validity via pilot testing. The scale's reliability and validity were subsequently examined in 263 undergraduate nursing students using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). <b>Results</b>: CFA confirmed a good fit of the original four-factor model (CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.026). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.906 overall) and strong test-retest reliability (ICC range: 0.859-0.914). Content validity indices were also high (I-CVI = 0.80-1.00, S-CVI/Ave = 0.94). <b>Conclusions</b>: The PS-HFS-J is a reliable, valid, and culturally adapted instrument for assessing psychological safety in Japanese nursing education. It can support educational research, curriculum development, and faculty training, contributing to safer and more effective simulation-based education. Future studies should examine its applicability across diverse educational levels and clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12298457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15070257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Psychological safety is essential for effective learning in high-fidelity simulation (HFS); however, no validated Japanese instrument currently exists to measure psychological safety among nursing students. This study aimed to translate the Psychological Safety in High-Fidelity Simulation (PS-HFS) scale into Japanese (PS-HFS-J) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: Following COSMIN guidelines, the PS-HFS was translated through forward and back translation, reviewed by an expert panel, and tested for face validity via pilot testing. The scale's reliability and validity were subsequently examined in 263 undergraduate nursing students using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: CFA confirmed a good fit of the original four-factor model (CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.026). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.906 overall) and strong test-retest reliability (ICC range: 0.859-0.914). Content validity indices were also high (I-CVI = 0.80-1.00, S-CVI/Ave = 0.94). Conclusions: The PS-HFS-J is a reliable, valid, and culturally adapted instrument for assessing psychological safety in Japanese nursing education. It can support educational research, curriculum development, and faculty training, contributing to safer and more effective simulation-based education. Future studies should examine its applicability across diverse educational levels and clinical contexts.

日本版心理安全高保真模拟量表(PS-HFS-J)的文化适应与验证
背景/目的:心理安全是高保真模拟(HFS)中有效学习的必要条件;然而,目前日本没有有效的工具来测量护理学生的心理安全。本研究旨在将高保真模拟心理安全量表(PS-HFS)翻译成日文(PS-HFS- j),并评估其心理测量特性。方法:根据COSMIN指南,PS-HFS采用正向翻译和反向翻译,由专家小组审核,并通过先导测试进行人脸效度测试。随后采用验证性因子分析(CFA)、Cronbach’s alpha和班级内相关系数(ICC)对263名本科护理学生进行了信度和效度检验。结果:CFA证实原四因素模型拟合良好(CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.026)。量表具有良好的内部一致性(总体Cronbach′s α = 0.906)和较强的重测信度(ICC范围:0.859 ~ 0.914)。内容效度指数也较高(I-CVI = 0.80-1.00, S-CVI/Ave = 0.94)。结论:PS-HFS-J量表是一种可靠、有效、具有文化适应性的评估日本护理教育心理安全的工具。它可以支持教育研究、课程开发和教师培训,为更安全、更有效的模拟教育做出贡献。未来的研究应检验其在不同教育水平和临床背景下的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信