Barriers to the Utilization of Research and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Among Nurses in Sabah, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING
Nadirah Sulaiman, Peter Seah Keng Tok, Juhanah Gimbo, Ammar Rafidah Saptu, Phylis Bridget Philip, Yau Kim Yain, Lilyiana Pengui, Drina Dalie, Norfairuziana Tinggal
{"title":"Barriers to the Utilization of Research and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Among Nurses in Sabah, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Nadirah Sulaiman, Peter Seah Keng Tok, Juhanah Gimbo, Ammar Rafidah Saptu, Phylis Bridget Philip, Yau Kim Yain, Lilyiana Pengui, Drina Dalie, Norfairuziana Tinggal","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15070258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>B<b>ackground/Objectives:</b> Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been widely adopted in clinical nursing practice, with nursing education efforts consistently emphasizing its importance in strengthening implementation efforts. Despite these efforts to promote translational research, the level of implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical nursing practice remains unsatisfactory. This study aimed to identify specific organizational, individual, and research-related barriers to the utilization of research in clinical practice among nurses in Sabah, Malaysia, to determine factors associated with these perceived barriers and to assess nurses' awareness and understanding of the implementation of evidence-based practice. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 using the BARRIERS scale, a validated tool that measures perceived barriers to the utilization of research across four domains: organizational barriers, nurses' research awareness and values, quality of research, and research communication. This study involved nurses from five tertiary hospitals in Sabah, Malaysia. <b>Results:</b> A total of 562 nurses participated in the study, with a mean age of 34.3 years (SD = 7.96) and mean duration of clinical practice of 10.0 years (SD = 7.58). While 66.5% of the nurses had heard of EBP, only 7.3% reported understanding it very well. The top three barriers to the utilization of research were 'the nurse does not feel she/he has enough authority to change patient care procedures' (35.9%), 'the nurse does not have time to read research' (27.8%), and 'research reports/articles are not published fast enough' (25.8%). Among the four domains, organizational barriers scored highest (mean = 2.7, SD = 0.72), followed by research communication (mean = 2.6, SD = 0.73). <b>Conclusions:</b> The study findings emphasize the challenges nurses encounter in integrating research into clinical practice and highlight the need for ongoing efforts to promote the utilization of evidence-based practice and research among nurses in Sabah, while addressing the identified gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15070258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been widely adopted in clinical nursing practice, with nursing education efforts consistently emphasizing its importance in strengthening implementation efforts. Despite these efforts to promote translational research, the level of implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical nursing practice remains unsatisfactory. This study aimed to identify specific organizational, individual, and research-related barriers to the utilization of research in clinical practice among nurses in Sabah, Malaysia, to determine factors associated with these perceived barriers and to assess nurses' awareness and understanding of the implementation of evidence-based practice. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 using the BARRIERS scale, a validated tool that measures perceived barriers to the utilization of research across four domains: organizational barriers, nurses' research awareness and values, quality of research, and research communication. This study involved nurses from five tertiary hospitals in Sabah, Malaysia. Results: A total of 562 nurses participated in the study, with a mean age of 34.3 years (SD = 7.96) and mean duration of clinical practice of 10.0 years (SD = 7.58). While 66.5% of the nurses had heard of EBP, only 7.3% reported understanding it very well. The top three barriers to the utilization of research were 'the nurse does not feel she/he has enough authority to change patient care procedures' (35.9%), 'the nurse does not have time to read research' (27.8%), and 'research reports/articles are not published fast enough' (25.8%). Among the four domains, organizational barriers scored highest (mean = 2.7, SD = 0.72), followed by research communication (mean = 2.6, SD = 0.73). Conclusions: The study findings emphasize the challenges nurses encounter in integrating research into clinical practice and highlight the need for ongoing efforts to promote the utilization of evidence-based practice and research among nurses in Sabah, while addressing the identified gaps.

障碍利用研究和实施循证实践的护士在沙巴,马来西亚:横断面研究。
背景/目的:循证实践(EBP)在临床护理实践中被广泛采用,护理教育工作不断强调其在加强实施工作中的重要性。尽管这些努力促进了转化研究,但临床护理实践中循证实践(EBP)的实施水平仍不令人满意。本研究旨在确定马来西亚沙巴州护士在临床实践中利用研究的具体组织、个人和研究相关障碍,以确定与这些感知障碍相关的因素,并评估护士对实施循证实践的认识和理解。方法:于2019年使用BARRIERS量表进行了一项横断面研究,该量表是一种经过验证的工具,用于衡量四个领域中对研究利用的感知障碍:组织障碍、护士的研究意识和价值观、研究质量和研究沟通。本研究涉及马来西亚沙巴州五所三级医院的护士。结果:共有562名护士参与研究,平均年龄34.3岁(SD = 7.96),平均临床执业时间10.0年(SD = 7.58)。66.5%的护士听说过EBP,仅有7.3%的护士表示非常了解EBP。利用研究成果的前三大障碍是“护士觉得自己没有足够的权力改变病人的护理程序”(35.9%)、“护士没有时间阅读研究成果”(27.8%)和“研究报告/文章发表得不够快”(25.8%)。在四个领域中,组织障碍得分最高(平均= 2.7,SD = 0.72),其次是研究沟通(平均= 2.6,SD = 0.73)。结论:研究结果强调了护士在将研究整合到临床实践中遇到的挑战,并强调了在解决已发现的差距的同时,需要不断努力促进沙巴州护士对循证实践和研究的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信