[The predictive value of cardiac MRI for the first episode of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy].

Q3 Medicine
Z X Dong, Y Y Song, X Ma, J X Wang, S J Yang, Y Tang, P Y Zhou, K Yang, X Y Chen, X X Zhao, S H Zhao
{"title":"[The predictive value of cardiac MRI for the first episode of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy].","authors":"Z X Dong, Y Y Song, X Ma, J X Wang, S J Yang, Y Tang, P Y Zhou, K Yang, X Y Chen, X X Zhao, S H Zhao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250117-00055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) derived left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LV LGE) for the primary prevention of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center retrospective study. Consecutive ARVC patients who underwent CMR at Fuwai Hospital between January 2016 and September 2020, with no history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias at diagnosis, were enrolled. Clinical data and CMR characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was defined as new-onset malignant ventricular arrhythmias related events, including sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation/flutter, sudden cardiac death, cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge. Follow-up via telephone interviews and medical records was conducted to confirm endpoint occurrences, and patients were categorized into event-free and event groups based on endpoint status. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to identify independent risk factors for malignant ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC patients. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the ARVC 5-year risk score (cutoff: 25%) and the median value of LV LGE percentage (cutoff: 13%). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted, and log-rank tests were used to compare the difference in the incidence of primary endpoint events between subgroups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratio test were used to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of LV LGE percentage beyond the ARVC 5-year risk score. <b>Results:</b> A total of 172 ARVC patients were enrolled, aged (39.0±16.6) years, including 73 females (42.4%). During a follow-up of 53.1 (25.4, 76.9) months, 51 patients (29.7%) experienced malignant ventricular arrhythmias related events, including 3 cases of sudden cardiac death, 1 cardiac arrest, 33 sustained ventricular tachycardia and 14 appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges. Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that the ARVC 5-year risk score (<i>HR</i>=1.028, 95%<i>CI</i> 1.015-1.041, <i>P</i><0.001) and LV LGE percentage (<i>HR</i>=1.059, 95%<i>CI</i> 1.032-1.087, <i>P</i><0.001) were independent risk factors of the primary endpoint events. Kaplan-Meier analysis using composite stratification (ARVC 5-year risk score cutoff: 25%; LV LGE percentage cutoff: 13%) demonstrated that patients with both high risk scores (≥25%) and extensive LV LGE (≥13%) had the highest risk of primary endpoint events. Notably, among patients with ARVC 5-year risk scores <25%, those with LV LGE≥13% had a higher incidence of primary endpoint events than those without (log-rank <i>P</i>=0.037). The composite prediction model combining the 5-year risk score and left ventricular LGE percentage demonstrated significantly improved predictive performance (area under the curve (<i>AUC</i>)=0.82, 95%<i>CI</i> 0.75-0.90; likelihood ratio test all <i>P</i><0.001) compared to single-variable models (left ventricular LGE percentage alone: <i>AUC</i>=0.71, 95%<i>CI</i> 0.63-0.82, <i>P</i>=0.01; 5-year risk score alone: <i>AUC</i>=0.71, 95%<i>CI</i> 0.62-0.81, <i>P</i>=0.02). <b>Conclusion:</b> LV LGE percentage independently predict new-onset malignant ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC patients and provided incremental prognostic value based on the existing ARVC 5-year risk score.</p>","PeriodicalId":38755,"journal":{"name":"中华心血管病杂志","volume":"53 7","pages":"784-791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华心血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250117-00055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) derived left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LV LGE) for the primary prevention of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. Consecutive ARVC patients who underwent CMR at Fuwai Hospital between January 2016 and September 2020, with no history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias at diagnosis, were enrolled. Clinical data and CMR characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was defined as new-onset malignant ventricular arrhythmias related events, including sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation/flutter, sudden cardiac death, cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge. Follow-up via telephone interviews and medical records was conducted to confirm endpoint occurrences, and patients were categorized into event-free and event groups based on endpoint status. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to identify independent risk factors for malignant ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC patients. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the ARVC 5-year risk score (cutoff: 25%) and the median value of LV LGE percentage (cutoff: 13%). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted, and log-rank tests were used to compare the difference in the incidence of primary endpoint events between subgroups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratio test were used to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of LV LGE percentage beyond the ARVC 5-year risk score. Results: A total of 172 ARVC patients were enrolled, aged (39.0±16.6) years, including 73 females (42.4%). During a follow-up of 53.1 (25.4, 76.9) months, 51 patients (29.7%) experienced malignant ventricular arrhythmias related events, including 3 cases of sudden cardiac death, 1 cardiac arrest, 33 sustained ventricular tachycardia and 14 appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges. Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that the ARVC 5-year risk score (HR=1.028, 95%CI 1.015-1.041, P<0.001) and LV LGE percentage (HR=1.059, 95%CI 1.032-1.087, P<0.001) were independent risk factors of the primary endpoint events. Kaplan-Meier analysis using composite stratification (ARVC 5-year risk score cutoff: 25%; LV LGE percentage cutoff: 13%) demonstrated that patients with both high risk scores (≥25%) and extensive LV LGE (≥13%) had the highest risk of primary endpoint events. Notably, among patients with ARVC 5-year risk scores <25%, those with LV LGE≥13% had a higher incidence of primary endpoint events than those without (log-rank P=0.037). The composite prediction model combining the 5-year risk score and left ventricular LGE percentage demonstrated significantly improved predictive performance (area under the curve (AUC)=0.82, 95%CI 0.75-0.90; likelihood ratio test all P<0.001) compared to single-variable models (left ventricular LGE percentage alone: AUC=0.71, 95%CI 0.63-0.82, P=0.01; 5-year risk score alone: AUC=0.71, 95%CI 0.62-0.81, P=0.02). Conclusion: LV LGE percentage independently predict new-onset malignant ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC patients and provided incremental prognostic value based on the existing ARVC 5-year risk score.

【心脏MRI对致心律失常右室心肌病首发恶性室性心律失常的预测价值】。
目的:探讨心脏磁共振成像(CMR)衍生左室晚期钆增强(LV LGE)对致心律失常右室心肌病(ARVC)患者恶性室性心律失常的一级预防价值。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究。纳入2016年1月至2020年9月在阜外医院连续行CMR的ARVC患者,诊断时无恶性室性心律失常史。收集临床资料和CMR特征。主要终点定义为新发恶性室性心律失常相关事件,包括持续性室性心动过速、室性颤动/扑动、心源性猝死、心脏骤停和适当的植入式心律转复除颤器出院。通过电话访谈和医疗记录进行随访以确认终点的发生,并根据终点状态将患者分为无事件组和事件组。采用单变量和多变量Cox回归分析,确定ARVC患者恶性室性心律失常的独立危险因素。根据ARVC 5年风险评分(截止值:25%)和LV LGE百分比中位数(截止值:13%)进行亚组分析。绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线,并采用log-rank检验比较亚组间主要终点事件发生率的差异。采用受试者工作特征曲线和似然比检验评价LV LGE百分比超出ARVC 5年风险评分的增量预后价值。结果:共纳入ARVC患者172例,年龄(39.0±16.6)岁,其中女性73例(42.4%)。在53.1(25.4,76.9)个月的随访中,51例(29.7%)发生恶性室性心律失常相关事件,其中心源性猝死3例,心搏骤停1例,持续性室性心动过速33例,适当的植入式心律转复除颤器出院14例。多变量Cox回归分析显示,ARVC 5年风险评分(HR=1.028, 95%CI 1.015 ~ 1.041, PHR=1.059, 95%CI 1.032 ~ 1.087, PP=0.037)。结合5年风险评分和左室LGE百分比的复合预测模型预测效果显著提高(曲线下面积(area under The curve, AUC)=0.82, 95%CI 0.75 ~ 0.90;似然比检验所有pac =0.71, 95%CI 0.63-0.82, P=0.01;单独5年风险评分:AUC=0.71, 95%CI 0.62-0.81, P=0.02)。结论:左室LGE百分比独立预测ARVC患者新发恶性室性心律失常,并在现有ARVC 5年风险评分的基础上提供增量预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华心血管病杂志
中华心血管病杂志 Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10577
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Cardiology , established in February 1973, is one of the major academic medical journals sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and a leading periodical in the field of cardiology in China. It specializes in cardiology and related disciplines with a readership of more than 25 000. The journal publishes editorials and guidelines as well as important original articles on clinical and experimental investigations, reflecting achievements made in China and promoting academic communication between domestic and foreign cardiologists. The journal includes the following columns: Editorials, Strategies, Comments, Clinical Investigations, Experimental Investigations, Epidemiology and Prevention, Lectures, Comprehensive Reviews, Continuing Medical Education, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信