[Impact of retinol-binding protein changes on tafamidis treatment response in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis].

Q3 Medicine
M Wu, S Y Zhang, Y Lu, Z Tian, S Y Zhang
{"title":"[Impact of retinol-binding protein changes on tafamidis treatment response in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis].","authors":"M Wu, S Y Zhang, Y Lu, Z Tian, S Y Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250310-00176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the relationship between retinol-binding protein (RBP) levels and disease severity in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), as well as its impact on therapeutic response to tafamidis. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study utilized data from the China National Rare Disease Registry System and included ATTR-CA patients treated with tafamidis between January 2018 and September 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on baseline RBP levels: the normal RBP group (≥36 mg/L) and the reduced RBP group (<36 mg/L). Baseline characteristics and clinical data after one year of treatment were collected and compared between the groups. Within the reduced RBP group, patients were further subclassified by changes in RBP levels after treatment (ΔRBP=post-treatment RBP-baseline RBP) into ΔRBP>0 and ΔRBP<0 subgroups. Worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) after treatment was defined as the primary outcome, logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors influencing therapeutic response to tafamidis in ATTR-CA patients. <b>Results:</b> A total of 52 ATTR-CA patients were included (aged (58.5±12.0) years, 46 males (88%)). Among 39 patients who completed one-year tafamidis treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed in RBP levels post-treatment versus baseline ((27.0±14.3) mg/L vs. (25.9±15.4) mg/L, <i>P</i>=0.261). Compared to the normal RBP group, the reduced RBP group had significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (2 316.0 (1 161.5, 6 027.8) ng/L vs. 806.2 (349.5, 1 735.8) ng/L), higher left ventricular mass index ((164.4±46.5) g/m² vs. (123.9±31.8) g/m²), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction ((50.8±11.3)% vs. (58.8±6.2)%) (all <i>P</i><0.05). Among 31 patients in the reduced RBP group who completed one-year tafamidis treatment, 23 were classified as ΔRBP>0 and 8 as ΔRBP<0. The ΔRBP<0 group exhibited greater GLS worsening than the ΔRBP>0 group (0.7 (-0.1, 1.4)% vs. -0.4 (-1.4, 0.2)%, <i>P</i>=0.027). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ΔRBP<0 was an independent risk factor for GLS worsening (<i>OR</i>=8.584, <i>95%CI</i> 1.186-62.150, <i>P</i>=0.033) in ATTR-CA patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> ATTR-CA patients with reduced RBP levels exhibit more severe left ventricular structural and functional impairment compared to those with normal RBP levels. Decline in RBP during treatment (ΔRBP<0) is associated with poorer response to tafamidis treatment. Monitoring RBP dynamics may assist clinicians in assessing disease severity and therapeutic response in ATTR-CA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38755,"journal":{"name":"中华心血管病杂志","volume":"53 7","pages":"776-783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华心血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250310-00176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relationship between retinol-binding protein (RBP) levels and disease severity in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), as well as its impact on therapeutic response to tafamidis. Methods: This retrospective study utilized data from the China National Rare Disease Registry System and included ATTR-CA patients treated with tafamidis between January 2018 and September 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on baseline RBP levels: the normal RBP group (≥36 mg/L) and the reduced RBP group (<36 mg/L). Baseline characteristics and clinical data after one year of treatment were collected and compared between the groups. Within the reduced RBP group, patients were further subclassified by changes in RBP levels after treatment (ΔRBP=post-treatment RBP-baseline RBP) into ΔRBP>0 and ΔRBP<0 subgroups. Worsening of global longitudinal strain (GLS) after treatment was defined as the primary outcome, logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors influencing therapeutic response to tafamidis in ATTR-CA patients. Results: A total of 52 ATTR-CA patients were included (aged (58.5±12.0) years, 46 males (88%)). Among 39 patients who completed one-year tafamidis treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed in RBP levels post-treatment versus baseline ((27.0±14.3) mg/L vs. (25.9±15.4) mg/L, P=0.261). Compared to the normal RBP group, the reduced RBP group had significantly higher estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (2 316.0 (1 161.5, 6 027.8) ng/L vs. 806.2 (349.5, 1 735.8) ng/L), higher left ventricular mass index ((164.4±46.5) g/m² vs. (123.9±31.8) g/m²), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction ((50.8±11.3)% vs. (58.8±6.2)%) (all P<0.05). Among 31 patients in the reduced RBP group who completed one-year tafamidis treatment, 23 were classified as ΔRBP>0 and 8 as ΔRBP<0. The ΔRBP<0 group exhibited greater GLS worsening than the ΔRBP>0 group (0.7 (-0.1, 1.4)% vs. -0.4 (-1.4, 0.2)%, P=0.027). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ΔRBP<0 was an independent risk factor for GLS worsening (OR=8.584, 95%CI 1.186-62.150, P=0.033) in ATTR-CA patients. Conclusion: ATTR-CA patients with reduced RBP levels exhibit more severe left ventricular structural and functional impairment compared to those with normal RBP levels. Decline in RBP during treatment (ΔRBP<0) is associated with poorer response to tafamidis treatment. Monitoring RBP dynamics may assist clinicians in assessing disease severity and therapeutic response in ATTR-CA patients.

[视黄醇结合蛋白改变对转甲状腺素型心脏淀粉样变性患者他非他汀治疗反应的影响]。
目的:探讨转甲状腺素型心脏淀粉样变性(atr - ca)患者视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)水平与病情严重程度的关系及其对他非他汀治疗反应的影响。方法:本回顾性研究利用了中国国家罕见病登记系统的数据,纳入了2018年1月至2022年9月期间接受他非他胺治疗的atr - ca患者。根据RBP基线水平将患者分为正常RBP组(≥36 mg/L)和RBP降低组(0和ΔRBPResults)两组:共纳入52例atr - ca患者(年龄(58.5±12.0)岁,男性46例(88%))。在39例完成1年他法非底斯治疗的患者中,治疗后RBP水平与基线相比无统计学差异((27.0±14.3)mg/L vs(25.9±15.4)mg/L, P=0.261)。与正常RBP组相比,RBP降低组估计肾小球滤过率调整后的n端前b型利钠肽水平显著升高(2 316.0 (1 161.5,6 027.8)ng/L vs. 806.2 (349.5, 1 735.8) ng/L),左室质量指数升高((164.4±46.5)g/m²vs.(123.9±31.8)g/m²),左室射血分数降低((50.8±11.3)% vs.(58.8±6.2)%)(所有P0和8为ΔRBP0组(0.7 (-0.1,1.4)% vs. -0.4 (-1.4, 0.2)%, P=0.027)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,atr - ca患者ΔRBPOR=8.584, 95%CI 1.186 ~ 62.150, P=0.033)。结论:与RBP水平正常的患者相比,RBP水平降低的atr - ca患者表现出更严重的左室结构和功能损害。治疗期间RBP下降(ΔRBP)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华心血管病杂志
中华心血管病杂志 Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10577
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Cardiology , established in February 1973, is one of the major academic medical journals sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and a leading periodical in the field of cardiology in China. It specializes in cardiology and related disciplines with a readership of more than 25 000. The journal publishes editorials and guidelines as well as important original articles on clinical and experimental investigations, reflecting achievements made in China and promoting academic communication between domestic and foreign cardiologists. The journal includes the following columns: Editorials, Strategies, Comments, Clinical Investigations, Experimental Investigations, Epidemiology and Prevention, Lectures, Comprehensive Reviews, Continuing Medical Education, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信