Semantic memory and creative evaluation.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Amit Skurnik, Rakefet Ackerman, Yoed N Kenett
{"title":"Semantic memory and creative evaluation.","authors":"Amit Skurnik, Rakefet Ackerman, Yoed N Kenett","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Creativity is a fundamental cognitive skill enabling the generation of original and effective ideas. While research has focused on creative idea generation, relatively little is known about creative idea evaluation, particularly from a metacognitive perspective. Understanding how knowledge structures relate to metacognitive processes that accompany creative thinking can further elucidate its complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the relatedness judgment task, we constructed participants' (N = 106) semantic memory networks. These networks provide individual-level measures such as network integration (efficiency), local connectivity, and community structure. These metrics were related to participants' performance in the alternative uses task (AUT), which was used to assess both creative performance and participants' subjective judgments of the originality of their responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective originality was predicted by semantic memory networks that were broadly connected and avoided tightly knit clusters. In contrast, originality judgments were predicted by semantic memory networks that were highly integrated and efficient. These findings suggest a dissociation between objective originality performance and individuals' self-assessments of originality. Finally, the number of ideas generated in the AUT was a consistent and strong predictor of both creative performance and individuals' self-assessments of originality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal how different aspects of semantic memory structure contribute to creative thinking and metacognitive judgments.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Creativity is a fundamental cognitive skill enabling the generation of original and effective ideas. While research has focused on creative idea generation, relatively little is known about creative idea evaluation, particularly from a metacognitive perspective. Understanding how knowledge structures relate to metacognitive processes that accompany creative thinking can further elucidate its complexity.

Methods: Using the relatedness judgment task, we constructed participants' (N = 106) semantic memory networks. These networks provide individual-level measures such as network integration (efficiency), local connectivity, and community structure. These metrics were related to participants' performance in the alternative uses task (AUT), which was used to assess both creative performance and participants' subjective judgments of the originality of their responses.

Results: Objective originality was predicted by semantic memory networks that were broadly connected and avoided tightly knit clusters. In contrast, originality judgments were predicted by semantic memory networks that were highly integrated and efficient. These findings suggest a dissociation between objective originality performance and individuals' self-assessments of originality. Finally, the number of ideas generated in the AUT was a consistent and strong predictor of both creative performance and individuals' self-assessments of originality.

Conclusions: Our findings reveal how different aspects of semantic memory structure contribute to creative thinking and metacognitive judgments.

语义记忆与创造性评价。
背景:创造力是一种基本的认知技能,能够产生原创和有效的想法。虽然研究集中在创意产生上,但对创意评估的了解相对较少,特别是从元认知的角度来看。了解知识结构如何与伴随创造性思维的元认知过程相关联,可以进一步阐明其复杂性。方法:采用相关性判断任务,构建被试(106人)的语义记忆网络。这些网络提供个人层面的度量,例如网络集成(效率)、本地连接和社区结构。这些指标与参与者在替代用途任务(AUT)中的表现有关,该任务用于评估创造性表现和参与者对其回答原创性的主观判断。结果:广泛连接的语义记忆网络能够预测客观独创性,避免紧密连接的语义记忆网络。相比之下,原创性判断是由高度整合和高效的语义记忆网络预测的。这些发现表明,客观的独创性表现与个体对独创性的自我评价之间存在分离。最后,在AUT中产生的想法数量是创造性表现和个人对独创性的自我评估的一致和强有力的预测指标。结论:我们的研究结果揭示了语义记忆结构的不同方面对创造性思维和元认知判断的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信