Health risk factors in different educational groups and their association to Barrett's esophagus.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nikolaus Götz, Andreas Völkerer, Hannah Hofer, Sarah Wernly, Georg Semmler, Ewald Wöll, Elmar Aigner, Maria Flamm, Christian Datz, Bernhard Wernly
{"title":"Health risk factors in different educational groups and their association to Barrett's esophagus.","authors":"Nikolaus Götz, Andreas Völkerer, Hannah Hofer, Sarah Wernly, Georg Semmler, Ewald Wöll, Elmar Aigner, Maria Flamm, Christian Datz, Bernhard Wernly","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02575-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>General health risk factors may vary significantly across different education groups. These disparities in lifestyle choices can contribute to the development of chronic conditions, including gastrointestinal disorders. Barrett's esophagus (BE), a premalignant condition associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer, may be influenced by these social determinants of health. This work explores how education status shapes the prevalence of BE, considering how key health risk factors in different education groups impact the development of the condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a cohort of 5160 Austrian individuals who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and screening colonoscopy. Participants were categorized into three education groups: low (n = 1933), medium (n = 2780), and high (n = 447). The distribution of risk factors across education groups was observed and the prevalence of BE (including any BE and dysplastic BE) was assessed using univariate and multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, metabolic syndrome, smoking, alcohol consumption, reflux severity, hiatal hernia and proton pump inhibitor intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>General health risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome, alcohol consumption, gastroesophageal reflux and smoking are more prevalent in lower education groups, contributing to a higher burden of chronic diseases. The prevalence of histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus was low across all education levels, showing no significant differences (p = 0.90). Nondysplastic BE was present in 1% of participants, with similar rates across the low, medium and high education groups (1% each). Only one case of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) was found in the medium education group. In the unadjusted analysis no significant link was found between education level and Barrett's esophagus. Compared to those with lower education, the odds were 1.25 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.71-2.19, p = 0.443) for medium and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.31-2.69, p = 0.864) for high education. In the fully controlled model, accounting for age, sex, metabolic syndrome, smoking, alcohol consumption, reflux severity, hiatal hernia, and proton pump inhibitor use, the association remained nonsignificant, with odds ratios of 1.15 (95% CI: 0.55-2.40, p = 0.719) for medium and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.30-3.36, p = 0.986) for high education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that education level is associated with the distribution of general risk factors, but it is not a key factor in Barrett's esophagus risk in an asymptomatic screening population. Although education impacts health outcomes in many conditions, its influence on BE seems minimal. Future research should explore broader socioeconomic factors, such as income, occupation and healthcare access for a better understanding of the BE risk and detection disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02575-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: General health risk factors may vary significantly across different education groups. These disparities in lifestyle choices can contribute to the development of chronic conditions, including gastrointestinal disorders. Barrett's esophagus (BE), a premalignant condition associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer, may be influenced by these social determinants of health. This work explores how education status shapes the prevalence of BE, considering how key health risk factors in different education groups impact the development of the condition.

Methods: We analyzed data from a cohort of 5160 Austrian individuals who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and screening colonoscopy. Participants were categorized into three education groups: low (n = 1933), medium (n = 2780), and high (n = 447). The distribution of risk factors across education groups was observed and the prevalence of BE (including any BE and dysplastic BE) was assessed using univariate and multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, metabolic syndrome, smoking, alcohol consumption, reflux severity, hiatal hernia and proton pump inhibitor intake.

Results: General health risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome, alcohol consumption, gastroesophageal reflux and smoking are more prevalent in lower education groups, contributing to a higher burden of chronic diseases. The prevalence of histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus was low across all education levels, showing no significant differences (p = 0.90). Nondysplastic BE was present in 1% of participants, with similar rates across the low, medium and high education groups (1% each). Only one case of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) was found in the medium education group. In the unadjusted analysis no significant link was found between education level and Barrett's esophagus. Compared to those with lower education, the odds were 1.25 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.71-2.19, p = 0.443) for medium and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.31-2.69, p = 0.864) for high education. In the fully controlled model, accounting for age, sex, metabolic syndrome, smoking, alcohol consumption, reflux severity, hiatal hernia, and proton pump inhibitor use, the association remained nonsignificant, with odds ratios of 1.15 (95% CI: 0.55-2.40, p = 0.719) for medium and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.30-3.36, p = 0.986) for high education.

Conclusion: Our study indicates that education level is associated with the distribution of general risk factors, but it is not a key factor in Barrett's esophagus risk in an asymptomatic screening population. Although education impacts health outcomes in many conditions, its influence on BE seems minimal. Future research should explore broader socioeconomic factors, such as income, occupation and healthcare access for a better understanding of the BE risk and detection disparities.

不同教育程度人群的健康危险因素及其与Barrett食管的关系。
导言:一般健康风险因素在不同教育程度的人群中可能存在显著差异。这些生活方式选择上的差异可能导致慢性疾病的发展,包括胃肠道疾病。巴雷特食管(BE)是一种与食管癌风险增加相关的恶性前病变,可能受到这些健康社会决定因素的影响。这项工作探讨了教育状况如何影响BE的流行,考虑了不同教育群体的关键健康风险因素如何影响病情的发展。方法:我们分析了5160名接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和筛查结肠镜检查的奥地利人的队列数据。参与者被分为三个教育组:低(n = 1933),中等(n = 2780)和高(n = 447)。观察各教育组的危险因素分布,并使用单变量和多变量回归分析评估BE的患病率(包括任何BE和发育不良BE),调整潜在的混杂因素,如年龄、性别、代谢综合征、吸烟、饮酒、反流严重程度、食道疝和质子泵抑制剂的摄入。结果:一般健康风险因素,如代谢综合征、饮酒、胃食管反流和吸烟在低学历人群中更为普遍,导致慢性疾病负担更高。组织学证实的Barrett食管患病率在所有教育水平中均较低,无显著差异(p = 0.90)。非发育不良的BE出现在1%的参与者中,低、中、高等教育组的比例相似(各1%)。中等教育程度组仅1例出现高度发育不良(HGD)。在未调整的分析中,未发现教育水平与Barrett食管之间有显著联系。与受教育程度较低的人相比,中等教育的几率为1.25(95%置信区间,CI: 0.71-2.19, p = 0.443),高等教育的几率为0.91 (95% CI: 0.31-2.69, p = 0.864)。在完全对照模型中,考虑到年龄、性别、代谢综合征、吸烟、饮酒、反流严重程度、孔疝和质子泵抑制剂的使用,相关性仍然不显著,中等教育的比值比为1.15 (95% CI: 0.55-2.40, p = 0.719),高等教育的比值比为1.01 (95% CI: 0.30-3.36, p = 0.986)。结论:我们的研究表明,教育水平与一般危险因素的分布有关,但在无症状筛查人群中,教育水平不是Barrett食管危险的关键因素。虽然教育在许多情况下影响健康结果,但它对BE的影响似乎很小。未来的研究应探索更广泛的社会经济因素,如收入、职业和医疗保健获取,以更好地了解BE风险和检测差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信