[Clinical application of pelvic floor en bloc resection in combined pelvic organ resection for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer].

Q3 Medicine
G L Chen, Y Lu, R X Zhang, N Su, Z G Wang, G Y Shao, J Zhang
{"title":"[Clinical application of pelvic floor <i>en bloc</i> resection in combined pelvic organ resection for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer].","authors":"G L Chen, Y Lu, R X Zhang, N Su, Z G Wang, G Y Shao, J Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250424-00169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of a total pelvic floor resection procedure as a component of combined resection of pelvic organs for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer. <b>Methods:</b> This was a descriptive case series. Relevant clinical data of patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer without extrapelvic metastasis or with only oligometastasis who had undergone combined pelvic organ resection with resection of the entire pelvic floor in the Department of Anorectal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were collected from a Chinese database of combined pelvic organ resection for rectal cancer. The study cohort comprised 143 patients, 74 of whom were male (51.7%) and 69 were female (48.3%); their ages averaged 54 (range: 31-75) years; 57 of the patients (39.9%) had locally advanced rectal cancer and 86 (60.1%) locally recurrent rectal cancer. In our institution, the pelvic floor is categorized into two anatomical layers: the levator ani/presacral anterior tissue, and the bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue. The entire pelvic floor was resected <i>en bloc</i> after making incisions on both sides of the pelvic floor, followed by presacral sacral dissection, and abdominoperineal dissection of the anterior side of the pelvic floor. The main factors studied were related to the following: (1) surgical conditions, comprising the scope of surgical resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tissue reconstruction; (2) postoperative recovery, comprising time to recovery of intestinal function, time to removal of drainage tubes, and time to healing of the empty pelvic cavity; and (3) postoperative complications, classified according to the international Clavien-Dindo classification. <b>Results:</b> Combined pelvic organ resection with entire pelvic floor resection was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time was 480 (390 to 1,020) minutes, intraoperative blood loss 800 (50 to 3,500) mL, and volume of blood transfused intraoperatively 1, 000 (400 to 7, 400). R0 resection was achieved in 116 cases (81.1%) and R1 resection in 27 (18.9%). The first layer of the pelvic floor wall (levator ani/sacral anterior tissue) was resected in 79 cases (55.2%) and the second layer of the pelvic floor wall (bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue) in 64 (44.8%). The procedure was completed in the lithotomy position in 114 cases (79.7%) were and in the lithotomy + prone jackknife position in 29 (20.3%). The pelvic floor was reconstructed with mesh in 140 cases (97.7%) and with mesh plus pedicled omental flaps in 92 cases (64.3%). The urinary tract was reconstructed in 92 cases (64.3%). The time to recovery of intestinal function was 3.6 (2.0 to 7.0) days, to removal of drainage tubes 29.4 (24.0 to 54.0) days, and to healing of the empty pelvic cavity 36.2 (27.0 to 56.0) days. Twenty-three patients (16.1%) had Grade I - II complications and 36 (25.2%) Grade IIIa - IV complications. The median duration of follow-up was 15.5 (0.5 to 30.0) months. Six of the patients (4.2%) died, including two (1.4%) who died within 30 days after surgery. <b>Conclusions:</b> Pelvic floor <i>en bloc</i> resection has a high R0 resection rate and is a safe and feasible procedure for pelvic organ resection surgeries in patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 7","pages":"743-750"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20250424-00169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of a total pelvic floor resection procedure as a component of combined resection of pelvic organs for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer. Methods: This was a descriptive case series. Relevant clinical data of patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer without extrapelvic metastasis or with only oligometastasis who had undergone combined pelvic organ resection with resection of the entire pelvic floor in the Department of Anorectal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were collected from a Chinese database of combined pelvic organ resection for rectal cancer. The study cohort comprised 143 patients, 74 of whom were male (51.7%) and 69 were female (48.3%); their ages averaged 54 (range: 31-75) years; 57 of the patients (39.9%) had locally advanced rectal cancer and 86 (60.1%) locally recurrent rectal cancer. In our institution, the pelvic floor is categorized into two anatomical layers: the levator ani/presacral anterior tissue, and the bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue. The entire pelvic floor was resected en bloc after making incisions on both sides of the pelvic floor, followed by presacral sacral dissection, and abdominoperineal dissection of the anterior side of the pelvic floor. The main factors studied were related to the following: (1) surgical conditions, comprising the scope of surgical resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tissue reconstruction; (2) postoperative recovery, comprising time to recovery of intestinal function, time to removal of drainage tubes, and time to healing of the empty pelvic cavity; and (3) postoperative complications, classified according to the international Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Combined pelvic organ resection with entire pelvic floor resection was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time was 480 (390 to 1,020) minutes, intraoperative blood loss 800 (50 to 3,500) mL, and volume of blood transfused intraoperatively 1, 000 (400 to 7, 400). R0 resection was achieved in 116 cases (81.1%) and R1 resection in 27 (18.9%). The first layer of the pelvic floor wall (levator ani/sacral anterior tissue) was resected in 79 cases (55.2%) and the second layer of the pelvic floor wall (bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue) in 64 (44.8%). The procedure was completed in the lithotomy position in 114 cases (79.7%) were and in the lithotomy + prone jackknife position in 29 (20.3%). The pelvic floor was reconstructed with mesh in 140 cases (97.7%) and with mesh plus pedicled omental flaps in 92 cases (64.3%). The urinary tract was reconstructed in 92 cases (64.3%). The time to recovery of intestinal function was 3.6 (2.0 to 7.0) days, to removal of drainage tubes 29.4 (24.0 to 54.0) days, and to healing of the empty pelvic cavity 36.2 (27.0 to 56.0) days. Twenty-three patients (16.1%) had Grade I - II complications and 36 (25.2%) Grade IIIa - IV complications. The median duration of follow-up was 15.5 (0.5 to 30.0) months. Six of the patients (4.2%) died, including two (1.4%) who died within 30 days after surgery. Conclusions: Pelvic floor en bloc resection has a high R0 resection rate and is a safe and feasible procedure for pelvic organ resection surgeries in patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer.

[盆底整体切除在盆腔器官联合切除治疗局部晚期或局部复发直肠癌中的临床应用]。
目的:探讨盆底全切除术作为盆腔脏器联合切除术治疗局部晚期或局部复发直肠癌的可行性、安全性和短期疗效。方法:这是一个描述性的病例系列。收集海军医科大学第二附属医院肛肠外科于2023年1月1日至2024年6月30日在中国直肠癌盆腔联合脏器切除数据库中行盆腔联合脏器切除加全盆底切除的局部晚期或局部复发无盆腔外转移或仅少转移的直肠癌患者的相关临床资料。研究队列共纳入143例患者,其中男性74例(51.7%),女性69例(48.3%);平均年龄54岁(范围:31-75岁);局部晚期直肠癌57例(39.9%),局部复发直肠癌86例(60.1%)。在我们的机构中,盆底被分为两个解剖层:提肛肌/骶前组织和骨/韧带/盆底软组织。在盆底两侧切开后,整体切除整个盆底,然后进行骶前解剖,盆底前部腹会阴解剖。研究的主要因素与以下有关:(1)手术条件,包括手术切除范围、手术时间、术中出血量、组织重建;(2)术后恢复时间,包括肠功能恢复时间、拔管时间、空盆腔愈合时间;(3)术后并发症,按照国际Clavien-Dindo分类。结果:所有患者均成功完成盆腔器官联合全盆底切除术。手术时间480 (390 ~ 1020)min,术中失血量800 (50 ~ 3500)mL,术中输血量1000 (400 ~ 7400)mL。R0切除116例(81.1%),R1切除27例(18.9%)。第一层盆底壁(提肛肌/骶前组织)切除79例(55.2%),第二层盆底壁(骨/韧带/盆底软组织)64例(44.8%)。取石位114例(79.7%),取石+俯卧刀位29例(20.3%)。用补片重建盆底140例(97.7%),补片加带蒂网膜瓣重建盆底92例(64.3%)。重建尿路92例(64.3%)。肠功能恢复3.6(2.0 ~ 7.0)天,拔管29.4(24.0 ~ 54.0)天,盆腔空腔愈合36.2(27.0 ~ 56.0)天。I - II级并发症23例(16.1%),IIIa - IV级并发症36例(25.2%)。中位随访时间为15.5(0.5 ~ 30.0)个月。6例患者(4.2%)死亡,其中2例(1.4%)在手术后30天内死亡。结论:盆底整体切除术R0切除率高,是局部晚期或局部复发直肠癌患者盆腔器官切除手术安全可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信