Lauren A O'Mara, Anthony J Fischetti, Daniel I Spector, Joel G Weltman
{"title":"Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Signs for the Detection of Severe Adhesions in Dogs with Abdominal Masses.","authors":"Lauren A O'Mara, Anthony J Fischetti, Daniel I Spector, Joel G Weltman","doi":"10.1111/vru.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preoperative detection of abdominal adhesions could influence surgical planning; however, imaging features of abdominal adhesions are minimally described in the veterinary literature. The purpose of this retrospective, diagnostic case-control study is to determine the preoperative CT imaging signs associated with surgically-confirmed, severe adhesions in dogs with abdominal masses. Dogs undergoing contrast-enhanced CT and surgery for abdominal masses from 2012 to 2022 were included in the study. Surgical records were evaluated and retrospectively reviewed by a board-certified surgeon to determine the severity of adhesions as pertaining to surgical planning and/or complications. The CTs of dogs with severe adhesions were mixed with age and weight-matched controls for review by a board-certified veterinary radiologist. A review of the literature on both people and animals determined the imaging features tested. The signs tested were fat stranding, fat stranding with vascular enhancement or vascular crowding, loss of fat planes (properitoneal fat sign), focal peritoneal enhancement with or without an alteration in visceral contour, loculation of fluid, and enhancing peritoneal bands. The presence of fat stranding (sensitivity 60.5; specificity 72.1), fat stranding with vascular enhancement (sensitivity 53.5, specificity 81.4), and loculation of peritoneal effusion (sensitivity 25.5; specificity 95.3) were significantly associated with the presence of adhesions at surgery. Loculation of peritoneal effusion surrounding the nondependent margin of an abdominal mass can alert imagers to the presence of severe adhesions. The absence of any of the signs tested does not exclude the presence of adhesions, especially in the retroperitoneum.</p>","PeriodicalId":23581,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","volume":"66 4","pages":"e70058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The preoperative detection of abdominal adhesions could influence surgical planning; however, imaging features of abdominal adhesions are minimally described in the veterinary literature. The purpose of this retrospective, diagnostic case-control study is to determine the preoperative CT imaging signs associated with surgically-confirmed, severe adhesions in dogs with abdominal masses. Dogs undergoing contrast-enhanced CT and surgery for abdominal masses from 2012 to 2022 were included in the study. Surgical records were evaluated and retrospectively reviewed by a board-certified surgeon to determine the severity of adhesions as pertaining to surgical planning and/or complications. The CTs of dogs with severe adhesions were mixed with age and weight-matched controls for review by a board-certified veterinary radiologist. A review of the literature on both people and animals determined the imaging features tested. The signs tested were fat stranding, fat stranding with vascular enhancement or vascular crowding, loss of fat planes (properitoneal fat sign), focal peritoneal enhancement with or without an alteration in visceral contour, loculation of fluid, and enhancing peritoneal bands. The presence of fat stranding (sensitivity 60.5; specificity 72.1), fat stranding with vascular enhancement (sensitivity 53.5, specificity 81.4), and loculation of peritoneal effusion (sensitivity 25.5; specificity 95.3) were significantly associated with the presence of adhesions at surgery. Loculation of peritoneal effusion surrounding the nondependent margin of an abdominal mass can alert imagers to the presence of severe adhesions. The absence of any of the signs tested does not exclude the presence of adhesions, especially in the retroperitoneum.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a bimonthly, international, peer-reviewed, research journal devoted to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Established in 1958, it is owned by the American College of Veterinary Radiology and is also the official journal for six affiliate veterinary organizations. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, World Association of Medical Editors, and Committee on Publication Ethics.
The mission of Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is to serve as a leading resource for high quality articles that advance scientific knowledge and standards of clinical practice in the areas of veterinary diagnostic radiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging, radiation oncology, and interventional radiology. Manuscript types include original investigations, imaging diagnosis reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor. Acceptance criteria include originality, significance, quality, reader interest, composition and adherence to author guidelines.