Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Detection by ddPCR in Adequately Ventilated Hospital Corridors.

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI:10.3390/toxics13070583
Joan Truyols-Vives, Marta González-López, Antoni Colom-Fernández, Alexander Einschütz-López, Ernest Sala-Llinàs, Antonio Doménech-Sánchez, Herme García-Baldoví, Josep Mercader-Barceló
{"title":"Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Detection by ddPCR in Adequately Ventilated Hospital Corridors.","authors":"Joan Truyols-Vives, Marta González-López, Antoni Colom-Fernández, Alexander Einschütz-López, Ernest Sala-Llinàs, Antonio Doménech-Sánchez, Herme García-Baldoví, Josep Mercader-Barceló","doi":"10.3390/toxics13070583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indoors, the infection risk of diseases transmitted through the airborne route is estimated from indoor carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) levels. However, the approaches to assess this risk do not account for the airborne concentration of pathogens, among other limitations. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between airborne SARS-CoV-2 levels and environmental parameters. Bioaerosols were sampled (<i>n</i> = 40) in hospital corridors of two wards differing in the COVID-19 severity of the admitted patients. SARS-CoV-2 levels were quantified using droplet digital PCR. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 60% of the total air samples. The ward where the mildly ill patients were admitted had a higher occupancy, transit of people in the corridor, and CO<sub>2</sub> levels, but there were no significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 detection between wards. The mean CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the positive samples was 569 ± 35.6 ppm. Considering all samples, the CO<sub>2</sub> levels in the corridor were positively correlated with patient door openings but inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 levels. In conclusion, airborne SARS-CoV-2 can be detected indoors with optimal ventilation, and its levels do not scale with CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in hospital corridors. Therefore, CO<sub>2</sub> assessment should not be interpreted as a surrogate of airborne viral presence in all indoor spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indoors, the infection risk of diseases transmitted through the airborne route is estimated from indoor carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. However, the approaches to assess this risk do not account for the airborne concentration of pathogens, among other limitations. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between airborne SARS-CoV-2 levels and environmental parameters. Bioaerosols were sampled (n = 40) in hospital corridors of two wards differing in the COVID-19 severity of the admitted patients. SARS-CoV-2 levels were quantified using droplet digital PCR. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 60% of the total air samples. The ward where the mildly ill patients were admitted had a higher occupancy, transit of people in the corridor, and CO2 levels, but there were no significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 detection between wards. The mean CO2 concentration in the positive samples was 569 ± 35.6 ppm. Considering all samples, the CO2 levels in the corridor were positively correlated with patient door openings but inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 levels. In conclusion, airborne SARS-CoV-2 can be detected indoors with optimal ventilation, and its levels do not scale with CO2 concentration in hospital corridors. Therefore, CO2 assessment should not be interpreted as a surrogate of airborne viral presence in all indoor spaces.

充分通风医院走廊空气中SARS-CoV-2的ddPCR检测
在室内,通过空气传播途径感染疾病的风险是根据室内二氧化碳水平估算的。然而,除其他限制外,评估这种风险的方法没有考虑到病原体在空气中的浓度。在本研究中,我们分析了空气中SARS-CoV-2水平与环境参数的关系。在入院患者COVID-19严重程度不同的两个病房的医院走廊取样生物气溶胶(n = 40)。采用液滴数字PCR定量检测SARS-CoV-2水平。60%的空气样本中检测到SARS-CoV-2。轻症患者所在病房的占用率、走廊通行率和CO2水平较高,但病房间SARS-CoV-2检测无显著差异。阳性样品中CO2平均浓度为569±35.6 ppm。综合所有样本,走廊内CO2水平与患者开门次数呈正相关,与SARS-CoV-2水平呈负相关。综上所述,在最佳通风的室内可以检测到空气中传播的SARS-CoV-2,其水平与医院走廊的二氧化碳浓度无关。因此,CO2评估不应被解释为所有室内空间中空气传播病毒存在的替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信