Aurelia aurita as a Model for Ecotoxicologically Assessing Food Additives: 2-Methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-ol and 1-Phenylethan-1-ol.

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI:10.3390/toxics13070572
Borja Mercado, Borja Vila, Luis Roca-Pérez, Neus Duran-Giner, Rafael Boluda-Hernández, Oscar Andreu-Sánchez
{"title":"<i>Aurelia aurita</i> as a Model for Ecotoxicologically Assessing Food Additives: 2-Methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-ol and 1-Phenylethan-1-ol.","authors":"Borja Mercado, Borja Vila, Luis Roca-Pérez, Neus Duran-Giner, Rafael Boluda-Hernández, Oscar Andreu-Sánchez","doi":"10.3390/toxics13070572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Industry currently generates numerous substances, such as food additives, whose environmental impacts, particularly in marine environments, remain inadequately assessed. This study employed <i>Aurelia aurita</i> for the first time as a model organism to evaluate the toxicity of such compounds. The main goal was to evaluate the toxicity of two food additives, 2-methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-ol (S1) and 1-phenylethan-1-ol (S2), on <i>A. aurita</i> ephyrae, comparing the results with other organisms representing different trophic levels, specifically the alga <i>Phaeodactylum tricornutum</i> and the crustacean <i>Artemia salina</i>. Acute toxicity tests were conducted on each organism. In <i>A. aurita</i>, S1 exhibited high toxicity (LC<sub>50</sub> ≈ 10 mg/L), while S2 had lower toxicity (LC<sub>50</sub> ≈ 80 mg/L). The pulsation frequency data for <i>A. aurita</i> revealed that S1 initially increased the pulsation rates at lower concentrations (maximum at 10 mg/L), followed by a significant decrease at higher concentrations. Conversely, S2 showed a steady decrease in pulsation rates up to 10 mg/L, with a slight increase at concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mg/L. The results demonstrate varying sensitivities to the toxic effects of the two compounds across different trophic levels, with <i>A. aurita</i> ephyrae being the most sensitive. This suggests the potential efficacy of jellyfish as novel ecotoxicological models due to their heightened sensitivity, enabling the detection of lower contaminant concentrations in test samples. Further research is required to enhance the efficiency of ecotoxicological assays using this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industry currently generates numerous substances, such as food additives, whose environmental impacts, particularly in marine environments, remain inadequately assessed. This study employed Aurelia aurita for the first time as a model organism to evaluate the toxicity of such compounds. The main goal was to evaluate the toxicity of two food additives, 2-methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-ol (S1) and 1-phenylethan-1-ol (S2), on A. aurita ephyrae, comparing the results with other organisms representing different trophic levels, specifically the alga Phaeodactylum tricornutum and the crustacean Artemia salina. Acute toxicity tests were conducted on each organism. In A. aurita, S1 exhibited high toxicity (LC50 ≈ 10 mg/L), while S2 had lower toxicity (LC50 ≈ 80 mg/L). The pulsation frequency data for A. aurita revealed that S1 initially increased the pulsation rates at lower concentrations (maximum at 10 mg/L), followed by a significant decrease at higher concentrations. Conversely, S2 showed a steady decrease in pulsation rates up to 10 mg/L, with a slight increase at concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mg/L. The results demonstrate varying sensitivities to the toxic effects of the two compounds across different trophic levels, with A. aurita ephyrae being the most sensitive. This suggests the potential efficacy of jellyfish as novel ecotoxicological models due to their heightened sensitivity, enabling the detection of lower contaminant concentrations in test samples. Further research is required to enhance the efficiency of ecotoxicological assays using this model.

作为食品添加剂2-甲基-1-苯丙醇和1-苯基比-1-醇生态毒理学评价模型的auria。
工业目前生产许多物质,例如食品添加剂,其对环境的影响,特别是对海洋环境的影响仍未得到充分评估。本研究首次以auria aurita为模型生物,对该类化合物的毒性进行了评价。主要目的是评价2-甲基-1-苯基丙烷-2-醇(S1)和1-苯基比-1-醇(S2)两种食品添加剂对黄颡鱼(A. aurita ephyrae)的毒性,并与其他不同营养水平的生物,特别是三角褐指藻(Phaeodactylum tricornutum)和甲壳类动物Artemia salina进行比较。对每种生物进行了急性毒性试验。S1毒性较高(LC50≈10 mg/L), S2毒性较低(LC50≈80 mg/L)。结果表明,S1在较低浓度下(10 mg/L时最大)首先增加了aurita的脉动频率,随后在较高浓度下显著降低。相反,S2在10 mg/L浓度下脉动率稳定下降,在15、20和25 mg/L浓度下略有增加。结果表明,在不同的营养水平上,对这两种化合物的毒性作用的敏感性是不同的,其中耳蚜是最敏感的。这表明水母作为新型生态毒理学模型的潜在功效,因为它们具有更高的敏感性,能够检测到测试样品中较低的污染物浓度。需要进一步的研究来提高使用该模型的生态毒理学分析的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信