Cartography of Accident Causation Models: Remapping the Modeling Landscape.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1111/risa.70084
Takaharu Igarashi, Karen Marais
{"title":"Cartography of Accident Causation Models: Remapping the Modeling Landscape.","authors":"Takaharu Igarashi, Karen Marais","doi":"10.1111/risa.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accident causation models are abstractions of the real world that explicitly or implicitly underlie our perception and understanding of accidents. As the continuous advancement of our dynamic society demands us to keep updating our understanding of accidents, this review article provides an overview of the landscape of accident causation models to aid our endless journey of expanding the collective endeavor of accident modeling. Our review of existing literature reviews identified several issues in the labels and categorizations of models, including logical inconsistency and ambiguous definitions, that prevent the comparison and analysis of models from a neutral and objective standpoint. To offer a structured perspective for revealing what was actually done in the past and what can be further explored in accident modeling practices, we developed an alternative map of modeling approaches based on their underlying assumptions and geometric structures of graphical representations. This article further provides individual reviews of 30 models, focusing particularly on how the assumptions and structures of the models inform the derivation of remedial and preventive measures. It concludes with a discussion on unexplored research paths that the alternative map directs us to investigate, indicating that our journey toward a safer world is far from complete.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accident causation models are abstractions of the real world that explicitly or implicitly underlie our perception and understanding of accidents. As the continuous advancement of our dynamic society demands us to keep updating our understanding of accidents, this review article provides an overview of the landscape of accident causation models to aid our endless journey of expanding the collective endeavor of accident modeling. Our review of existing literature reviews identified several issues in the labels and categorizations of models, including logical inconsistency and ambiguous definitions, that prevent the comparison and analysis of models from a neutral and objective standpoint. To offer a structured perspective for revealing what was actually done in the past and what can be further explored in accident modeling practices, we developed an alternative map of modeling approaches based on their underlying assumptions and geometric structures of graphical representations. This article further provides individual reviews of 30 models, focusing particularly on how the assumptions and structures of the models inform the derivation of remedial and preventive measures. It concludes with a discussion on unexplored research paths that the alternative map directs us to investigate, indicating that our journey toward a safer world is far from complete.

事故因果模型的制图:重新映射建模景观。
事故因果模型是对现实世界的抽象,它或明或暗地构成了我们对事故的感知和理解的基础。随着社会的不断发展,我们需要不断更新对事故的理解,这篇综述文章提供了事故原因模型的概况,以帮助我们不断扩大事故建模的集体努力。我们对现有文献综述的回顾发现了模型标签和分类中的几个问题,包括逻辑不一致和模糊的定义,这些问题阻碍了从中立和客观的角度对模型进行比较和分析。为了提供一个结构化的视角来揭示过去实际做了什么,以及在事故建模实践中可以进一步探索什么,我们基于建模方法的基本假设和图形表示的几何结构开发了一个替代图。本文进一步提供了30个模型的个别评论,特别关注模型的假设和结构如何告知补救和预防措施的推导。它最后讨论了替代地图引导我们调查的未探索的研究路径,表明我们通往更安全的世界的旅程远未完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信