Kai Heinrich, Christian Janiesch, Oliver Krancher, Philip Stahmann, Jonas Wanner, Patrick Zschech
{"title":"Decision factors for the selection of AI-based decision support systems-The case of task delegation in prognostics.","authors":"Kai Heinrich, Christian Janiesch, Oliver Krancher, Philip Stahmann, Jonas Wanner, Patrick Zschech","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision support systems (DSS) integrating artificial intelligence (AI) hold the potential to significantly enhance organizational decision-making performance and speed in areas such as prognostics in machine maintenance. A key issue for organizations aiming to leverage this potential is to select an appropriate AI-based DSS. In this paper, we develop a delegation perspective to identify decision factors and underlying AI system characteristics that affect the selection of AI-based DSS. Utilizing the analytical hierarchy process method, we derive decision weights for these characteristics and apply them to three archetypes of AI-based DSS designed for prognostics. Additionally, we explore how users' expertise levels impact their preferences for specific AI system characteristics. The results confirm that Performance is the most important decision factor, followed by Effort and Transparency. In line with these results, we find that the archetypes of prognostics systems using Direct Remaining Useful Life estimation and Similarity-based Matching best fit user preferences. Moreover, we find that novices and experts strongly prefer visual over structural explanations, while users with moderate expertise also value structural explanations to develop their skills further.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0328411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Decision support systems (DSS) integrating artificial intelligence (AI) hold the potential to significantly enhance organizational decision-making performance and speed in areas such as prognostics in machine maintenance. A key issue for organizations aiming to leverage this potential is to select an appropriate AI-based DSS. In this paper, we develop a delegation perspective to identify decision factors and underlying AI system characteristics that affect the selection of AI-based DSS. Utilizing the analytical hierarchy process method, we derive decision weights for these characteristics and apply them to three archetypes of AI-based DSS designed for prognostics. Additionally, we explore how users' expertise levels impact their preferences for specific AI system characteristics. The results confirm that Performance is the most important decision factor, followed by Effort and Transparency. In line with these results, we find that the archetypes of prognostics systems using Direct Remaining Useful Life estimation and Similarity-based Matching best fit user preferences. Moreover, we find that novices and experts strongly prefer visual over structural explanations, while users with moderate expertise also value structural explanations to develop their skills further.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage