Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Treatment Effects of Headgear and/or Functional Appliance on the Maxillo-Mandibular Growth in Preadolescent Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion.
Soichiro Yamada, Hee Ji Yoon, Youna Huh, Yoshinobu Yanagi, Jae Hyun Park, Kiyoshi Tai, Namkug Kim, Seung-Hak Baek
{"title":"Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Treatment Effects of Headgear and/or Functional Appliance on the Maxillo-Mandibular Growth in Preadolescent Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion.","authors":"Soichiro Yamada, Hee Ji Yoon, Youna Huh, Yoshinobu Yanagi, Jae Hyun Park, Kiyoshi Tai, Namkug Kim, Seung-Hak Baek","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the effects of headgear (HG) and/or functional appliance (FA) on the maxillo-mandibular growth in preadolescent patients with skeletal Class II (C-II) malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 206 Japanese preadolescent C-II patients treated with HG and/or FA, with serial lateral cephalograms taken at ages of 8 (T0) and 10 (T1). A single orthodontist with 7 years of experience identified 28 hard-tissue cephalometric landmarks. A Treatment Prediction Graph Convolutional Neural Network (TP-GCNN), integrating a high-resolution network and a graph neural network, was trained and validated using the landmarks' x- and y-coordinates. Data was split into training, validation and testing sets (ratio of 8:1:1; n = 164, n = 21 and n = 21). Model performance was assessed using the values of prediction error (PE, excellent, ≤ 0.5 mm; very good, 0.5-1.0 mm; good, 1.0-1.5 mm; acceptable, 1.5-2.0 mm; unsatisfactory, > 2.0 mm) and the degree of accurate prediction percentage (APP; very high, ≥ 90%; high, 70%-90%; medium, 50%-70%; low, < 50%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PE value was 1.45 mm. In terms of PE, all landmarks showed the accuracy above the 'acceptable' category. In terms of APP, 'High' APP was observed at Hinge axis, Pterygoid point, A-point, PNS, ANS, R1, R3 and Articulare. However, 'Low' APP was noted for Pm, Pogonion, B-point and Menton. The remaining landmarks demonstrated 'Medium' APP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the potential of AI to reliably predict the effects of HG and/or FA treatment in preadolescent patients with Class II malocclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the effects of headgear (HG) and/or functional appliance (FA) on the maxillo-mandibular growth in preadolescent patients with skeletal Class II (C-II) malocclusion.
Materials and methods: The study included 206 Japanese preadolescent C-II patients treated with HG and/or FA, with serial lateral cephalograms taken at ages of 8 (T0) and 10 (T1). A single orthodontist with 7 years of experience identified 28 hard-tissue cephalometric landmarks. A Treatment Prediction Graph Convolutional Neural Network (TP-GCNN), integrating a high-resolution network and a graph neural network, was trained and validated using the landmarks' x- and y-coordinates. Data was split into training, validation and testing sets (ratio of 8:1:1; n = 164, n = 21 and n = 21). Model performance was assessed using the values of prediction error (PE, excellent, ≤ 0.5 mm; very good, 0.5-1.0 mm; good, 1.0-1.5 mm; acceptable, 1.5-2.0 mm; unsatisfactory, > 2.0 mm) and the degree of accurate prediction percentage (APP; very high, ≥ 90%; high, 70%-90%; medium, 50%-70%; low, < 50%).
Results: The mean PE value was 1.45 mm. In terms of PE, all landmarks showed the accuracy above the 'acceptable' category. In terms of APP, 'High' APP was observed at Hinge axis, Pterygoid point, A-point, PNS, ANS, R1, R3 and Articulare. However, 'Low' APP was noted for Pm, Pogonion, B-point and Menton. The remaining landmarks demonstrated 'Medium' APP.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of AI to reliably predict the effects of HG and/or FA treatment in preadolescent patients with Class II malocclusion.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.