Geographic Distribution of Access to Glaucoma Surgery: An IRIS® Registry Analysis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Anagha Lokhande, Kanza Aziz, Asahi Fujita, Louis R Pasquale, Lucy Q Shen, David S Friedman, Michael V Boland, Alice C Lorch, Joan W Miller, Mengyu Wang, Tobias Elze, Nazlee Zebardast
{"title":"Geographic Distribution of Access to Glaucoma Surgery: An IRIS® Registry Analysis.","authors":"Anagha Lokhande, Kanza Aziz, Asahi Fujita, Louis R Pasquale, Lucy Q Shen, David S Friedman, Michael V Boland, Alice C Lorch, Joan W Miller, Mengyu Wang, Tobias Elze, Nazlee Zebardast","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated access to glaucoma surgical care by quantifying the geographic distribution of glaucoma surgeries across the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Using the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight), we extracted patient information associated with all glaucoma procedures from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate physician, patient travel, and practice patterns. The United States Department of Agriculture's Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes were utilized to define urban and non-urban zip codes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine which types of glaucoma surgeries were more likely to occur in urban areas. According to United States Postal Service definitions, districts were defined as aggregates of zip codes sharing the same first three digits; regions shared the same initial digit.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were the likelihood of each procedure type occurring in urban areas. The secondary outcomes were procedure characteristics (e.g., type, location) and the proportion of procedures requiring inter-region or inter-district travel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most performed glaucoma procedures were trabecular microbypass (iStent and Hydrus) (207,451 cases, 34%) and trabeculectomy (64,931 cases, 23%). Urban practice locations accounted for most surgeries (91%), with 96% of glaucoma subspecialists and 88% of non-glaucoma ophthalmologists performing surgeries exclusively in urban areas. Among 281,271 surgeries requiring inter-district travel (47%), most were performed in urban, rather than non-urban, practices (93%). A smaller subset of 42,667 surgeries involved inter-region travel (8% across all procedure types). Trabeculectomy (11%) and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation (10%) were the procedures with their highest proportion of cases involving inter-region travel. We found higher odds of nearly all types of glaucoma surgeries occurring in urban practice locations: goniotomy/canaloplasty (OR=1.66, CI:1.59 - 1.74), XEN ab interno (OR=1.54, CI:1.38 - 1.72), endocyclophotocoagulation (OR=1.46, CI=1.39 - 1.53), GDD (OR= 1.70, CI:1.62 - 1.77), and trabeculectomy (OR=1.24, CI:1.17 - 1.32). Only trabecular microbypass was less likely to be performed in urban areas (OR=0.49, CI:0.47 - 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients are more likely to receive most types of glaucoma surgeries in urban practice locations. Trabeculectomy or GDD implantation involved inter-regional travel in about 10% of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated access to glaucoma surgical care by quantifying the geographic distribution of glaucoma surgeries across the United States.

Design: Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Using the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight), we extracted patient information associated with all glaucoma procedures from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019.

Methods: Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate physician, patient travel, and practice patterns. The United States Department of Agriculture's Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes were utilized to define urban and non-urban zip codes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine which types of glaucoma surgeries were more likely to occur in urban areas. According to United States Postal Service definitions, districts were defined as aggregates of zip codes sharing the same first three digits; regions shared the same initial digit.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the likelihood of each procedure type occurring in urban areas. The secondary outcomes were procedure characteristics (e.g., type, location) and the proportion of procedures requiring inter-region or inter-district travel.

Results: The most performed glaucoma procedures were trabecular microbypass (iStent and Hydrus) (207,451 cases, 34%) and trabeculectomy (64,931 cases, 23%). Urban practice locations accounted for most surgeries (91%), with 96% of glaucoma subspecialists and 88% of non-glaucoma ophthalmologists performing surgeries exclusively in urban areas. Among 281,271 surgeries requiring inter-district travel (47%), most were performed in urban, rather than non-urban, practices (93%). A smaller subset of 42,667 surgeries involved inter-region travel (8% across all procedure types). Trabeculectomy (11%) and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation (10%) were the procedures with their highest proportion of cases involving inter-region travel. We found higher odds of nearly all types of glaucoma surgeries occurring in urban practice locations: goniotomy/canaloplasty (OR=1.66, CI:1.59 - 1.74), XEN ab interno (OR=1.54, CI:1.38 - 1.72), endocyclophotocoagulation (OR=1.46, CI=1.39 - 1.53), GDD (OR= 1.70, CI:1.62 - 1.77), and trabeculectomy (OR=1.24, CI:1.17 - 1.32). Only trabecular microbypass was less likely to be performed in urban areas (OR=0.49, CI:0.47 - 0.51).

Conclusions: Patients are more likely to receive most types of glaucoma surgeries in urban practice locations. Trabeculectomy or GDD implantation involved inter-regional travel in about 10% of cases.

青光眼手术的地理分布:IRIS®注册分析
目的:我们通过量化美国青光眼手术的地理分布来评估青光眼手术治疗的可及性。设计:回顾性队列研究参与者:使用IRIS®Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight),我们提取了2013年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间所有青光眼手术相关的患者信息。方法:采用描述性统计对医师、患者出行和执业模式进行评估。美国农业部的城乡通勤区域代码被用来定义城市和非城市的邮政编码。进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定哪些类型的青光眼手术更容易在城市地区发生。根据美国邮政服务的定义,地区被定义为具有相同前三位数字的邮政编码的总和;区域共享相同的初始数字。主要结局指标:主要结局是在城市地区发生每种手术类型的可能性。次要结果是手术特征(如类型、地点)和需要跨地区或跨地区旅行的手术比例。结果:青光眼手术最多的是小梁微搭桥(iStent and Hydrus)(207,451例,34%)和小梁切除术(64,931例,23%)。城市执业地点占大多数手术(91%),96%的青光眼专科医生和88%的非青光眼眼科医生只在城市地区进行手术。在需要跨地区旅行的281,271例手术中(47%),大多数在城市而不是非城市进行(93%)。42,667例手术中较小的一部分涉及区域间旅行(占所有手术类型的8%)。小梁切除术(11%)和青光眼引流装置(GDD)植入术(10%)是涉及区域间旅行的病例中比例最高的手术。我们发现几乎所有类型的青光眼手术在城市实践地点发生的几率更高:性腺切开术/管道成形术(OR=1.66, CI:1.59 - 1.74), XEN ab interno (OR=1.54, CI:1.38 - 1.72),内环光凝(OR=1.46, CI=1.39 - 1.53), GDD (OR= 1.70, CI:1.62 - 1.77)和小梁切除术(OR=1.24, CI:1.17 - 1.32)。在城市地区,只有小梁微旁路手术的可能性较低(OR=0.49, CI:0.47 - 0.51)。结论:大多数青光眼手术在城市诊所的患者更容易接受。小梁切除术或GDD植入约10%的病例涉及跨区域旅行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信