EXPEDITION: an Exploratory deep learning method to quantitatively predict hematoma progression after intracerebral hemorrhage.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Siqi Chen, Zixiao Li, Yinsheng Li, Donghua Mi
{"title":"EXPEDITION: an Exploratory deep learning method to quantitatively predict hematoma progression after intracerebral hemorrhage.","authors":"Siqi Chen, Zixiao Li, Yinsheng Li, Donghua Mi","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2536668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objects: </strong>This study aims to develop an Exploratory deep learning method to quantitatively predict hematoma progression (EXPEDITION in short) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with primary ICH in the basal ganglia or thalamus were retrospectively enrolled, and their baseline non-contrast CT (NCCT) image, CT perfusion (CTP) images, and subsequent re-examining NCCT images from the 2nd to the 8th day after baseline CTP were collected. The subjects who had received three or more re-examining scans were categorized into the test data set, and others were assigned to the training data set. Hematoma volume was estimated by manually outlining the lesion shown on each NCCT scan. Cerebral venous hemodynamic feature was extracted from CTP images. Then, EXPEDITION was trained. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the prediction performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients were enrolled initially, and 73 patients were included in the final analysis. They were then categorized into the training data set (58 patients with 93 scans) and the test data set (15 patients with 50 scans). For the test set, the mean difference [mean ±1.96SD] of hematoma volume between the EXPEDITION prediction and the reference is -0.96 [-9.64, +7.71] mL. Specifically, in the test set, the consistency between the true and the predicted volume values was compared, indicating that the EXPEDITION achieved the needed accuracy for quantitative prediction of hematoma progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An Exploratory deep learning method, EXPEDITION, was proposed to quantitatively predict hematoma progression after primary ICH in basal ganglia or thalamus.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2536668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objects: This study aims to develop an Exploratory deep learning method to quantitatively predict hematoma progression (EXPEDITION in short) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Methods: Patients with primary ICH in the basal ganglia or thalamus were retrospectively enrolled, and their baseline non-contrast CT (NCCT) image, CT perfusion (CTP) images, and subsequent re-examining NCCT images from the 2nd to the 8th day after baseline CTP were collected. The subjects who had received three or more re-examining scans were categorized into the test data set, and others were assigned to the training data set. Hematoma volume was estimated by manually outlining the lesion shown on each NCCT scan. Cerebral venous hemodynamic feature was extracted from CTP images. Then, EXPEDITION was trained. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the prediction performance.

Results: A total of 126 patients were enrolled initially, and 73 patients were included in the final analysis. They were then categorized into the training data set (58 patients with 93 scans) and the test data set (15 patients with 50 scans). For the test set, the mean difference [mean ±1.96SD] of hematoma volume between the EXPEDITION prediction and the reference is -0.96 [-9.64, +7.71] mL. Specifically, in the test set, the consistency between the true and the predicted volume values was compared, indicating that the EXPEDITION achieved the needed accuracy for quantitative prediction of hematoma progression.

Conclusions: An Exploratory deep learning method, EXPEDITION, was proposed to quantitatively predict hematoma progression after primary ICH in basal ganglia or thalamus.

EXPEDITION:一种用于定量预测脑出血后血肿进展的探索性深度学习方法。
目的:建立一种探索性深度学习方法定量预测脑出血(ICH)后血肿进展(简称EXPEDITION)。方法:回顾性纳入基底节区或丘脑原发性脑出血患者,收集其基线CTP后第2 ~ 8天的基线非对比CT (NCCT)图像、CT灌注(CTP)图像及随后复查的NCCT图像。接受过三次或三次以上复查扫描的受试者被归类为测试数据集,其他受试者被分配到训练数据集。血肿体积通过手动勾画每次NCCT扫描显示的病变来估计。从CTP图像中提取脑静脉血流动力学特征。然后,远征队接受了训练。采用Bland-Altman分析评估预测效果。结果:最初共纳入126例患者,最终纳入73例患者。然后将他们分为训练数据集(58名患者进行93次扫描)和测试数据集(15名患者进行50次扫描)。对于测试集,EXPEDITION预测血肿体积与参考血肿体积的平均差值[平均值±1.96SD]为-0.96 [-9.64,+7.71]mL。具体而言,在测试集中,比较了真实体积与预测体积之间的一致性,表明EXPEDITION达到了定量预测血肿进展所需的准确性。结论:提出了一种探索性深度学习方法EXPEDITION,用于定量预测基底节区或丘脑原发性脑出血后血肿进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信