Trends in the use of vaping products and other smoking cessation methods among adults who attempt to stop smoking: Findings from ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys (2016-2020).

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kimberly D'Mello, Pete Driezen, Katherine A East, Geoffrey T Fong, David Hammond
{"title":"Trends in the use of vaping products and other smoking cessation methods among adults who attempt to stop smoking: Findings from ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys (2016-2020).","authors":"Kimberly D'Mello, Pete Driezen, Katherine A East, Geoffrey T Fong, David Hammond","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>E-cigarettes are an increasingly popular method of smoking cessation assistance; however, there is little research on whether this has affected the number of smokers who quit using \"any\" evidence-based cessation aid. This study examined trends in the use of cessation aids, including e-cigarettes and other evidence-based methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are cross-sectional surveys in 2016, 2018, and 2020 from the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey conducted in Canada, United States (US), England, and Australia. Respondents were adults (≥18) recruited by commercial panel firms who currently smoked, and/or quit smoking in the past 12-months. Respondents were asked about use of e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapies (NRT), prescription medications, quitlines, and counseling services during their last quit attempt (LQA). GEE regression models analyzed separately by country examined use of cessation assistance among 14 536 observations (Canada = 4880; US = 2917; England = 4846; Australia = 1898).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cigarettes (29.9%) and NRT (29.8%) were popular methods of cessation assistance at LQA. Using e-cigarettes at LQA increased in Australia (2016 = 11.1%; 2020 = 25.1%; p=.002) and England (2016 = 37.1%; 2018 = 46.7%; p=.002), with no significant change in Canada or the US. Across all countries, there was little change over time in the overall use of evidence-based cessation assistance. Nearly half of respondents used some form of cessation assistance excluding e-cigarettes. Approximately two-thirds used \"any\" form of evidence-based cessation including e-cigarettes at LQA, which decreased in Canada (2016 = 64.0%, 2020 = 58.9%; p=.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While e-cigarettes are a popular cessation aid, use of other evidence-based cessation assistance has remained comparatively stable among adults that tried to quit smoking.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings indicated that e-cigarettes are a popular cessation method among adults trying to quit smoking. Despite differences in e-cigarette use and regulatory environments in the four countries, rates of evidence-based cessation assistance were similar across countries and over time. E-cigarettes can be an effective method for stopping smoking; however, the current study suggests few, if any, changes in the proportion of adults who smoke using any evidence-based form of cessation assistance, despite changes in the use of e-cigarettes as a quit aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: E-cigarettes are an increasingly popular method of smoking cessation assistance; however, there is little research on whether this has affected the number of smokers who quit using "any" evidence-based cessation aid. This study examined trends in the use of cessation aids, including e-cigarettes and other evidence-based methods.

Methods: Data are cross-sectional surveys in 2016, 2018, and 2020 from the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey conducted in Canada, United States (US), England, and Australia. Respondents were adults (≥18) recruited by commercial panel firms who currently smoked, and/or quit smoking in the past 12-months. Respondents were asked about use of e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement therapies (NRT), prescription medications, quitlines, and counseling services during their last quit attempt (LQA). GEE regression models analyzed separately by country examined use of cessation assistance among 14 536 observations (Canada = 4880; US = 2917; England = 4846; Australia = 1898).

Results: E-cigarettes (29.9%) and NRT (29.8%) were popular methods of cessation assistance at LQA. Using e-cigarettes at LQA increased in Australia (2016 = 11.1%; 2020 = 25.1%; p=.002) and England (2016 = 37.1%; 2018 = 46.7%; p=.002), with no significant change in Canada or the US. Across all countries, there was little change over time in the overall use of evidence-based cessation assistance. Nearly half of respondents used some form of cessation assistance excluding e-cigarettes. Approximately two-thirds used "any" form of evidence-based cessation including e-cigarettes at LQA, which decreased in Canada (2016 = 64.0%, 2020 = 58.9%; p=.010).

Conclusion: While e-cigarettes are a popular cessation aid, use of other evidence-based cessation assistance has remained comparatively stable among adults that tried to quit smoking.

Implications: The findings indicated that e-cigarettes are a popular cessation method among adults trying to quit smoking. Despite differences in e-cigarette use and regulatory environments in the four countries, rates of evidence-based cessation assistance were similar across countries and over time. E-cigarettes can be an effective method for stopping smoking; however, the current study suggests few, if any, changes in the proportion of adults who smoke using any evidence-based form of cessation assistance, despite changes in the use of e-cigarettes as a quit aid.

在试图戒烟的成年人中,使用电子烟产品和其他戒烟方法的趋势:ITC四个国家吸烟和电子烟调查(2016-2020)的结果。
电子烟是一种越来越受欢迎的戒烟辅助方法;然而,很少有研究表明这是否影响了使用“任何”基于证据的戒烟辅助工具戒烟的吸烟者的数量。这项研究调查了使用戒烟辅助工具的趋势,包括电子烟和其他循证方法。方法:数据来自2016年、2018年和2020年在加拿大、美国、英国和澳大利亚进行的ITC四国吸烟和电子烟调查的横断面调查。调查对象为目前吸烟和/或在过去12个月内戒烟的商业面板公司招募的成年人(≥18岁)。受访者被问及在最后一次戒烟尝试(LQA)期间使用电子烟、尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)、处方药、戒烟热线和咨询服务的情况。GEE回归模型按国家分别分析了14536个观察结果中戒烟援助的使用情况(加拿大= 4880;us = 2917;英格兰= 4846;澳大利亚(1898年)。结果:电子烟(29.9%)和NRT(29.8%)是LQA中常用的戒烟辅助方法。在澳大利亚LQA使用电子烟的人数有所增加(2016年= 11.1%;2020年= 25.1%;p=.002)和英格兰(2016 = 37.1%;2018年= 46.7%;p=.002),在加拿大和美国没有显著变化。在所有国家,随着时间的推移,基于证据的戒烟援助的总体使用几乎没有变化。近一半的受访者使用某种形式的戒烟帮助,但不包括电子烟。大约三分之二的LQA使用“任何”形式的循证戒烟,包括电子烟,这在加拿大有所下降(2016年= 64.0%,2020年= 58.9%;台端面应p =)。结论:虽然电子烟是一种流行的戒烟辅助手段,但在试图戒烟的成年人中,使用其他循证戒烟辅助手段仍然相对稳定。研究结果表明,在试图戒烟的成年人中,电子烟是一种流行的戒烟方法。尽管这四个国家的电子烟使用和监管环境存在差异,但各国和各时期的循证戒烟援助率相似。电子烟可以是戒烟的有效方法;然而,目前的研究表明,尽管电子烟作为戒烟辅助工具的使用发生了变化,但使用任何基于证据的戒烟辅助手段的成年人吸烟比例几乎没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信