Embodied concepts in Parkinson's disease: Insights from fruits versus animals semantic fluency impairments.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1037/neu0001026
Cosimo Tuena, Claudia Repetto, Agustin Ibáñez, Giulia Magni, Marco Stramba-Badiale, Giuseppe Riva
{"title":"Embodied concepts in Parkinson's disease: Insights from fruits versus animals semantic fluency impairments.","authors":"Cosimo Tuena, Claudia Repetto, Agustin Ibáñez, Giulia Magni, Marco Stramba-Badiale, Giuseppe Riva","doi":"10.1037/neu0001026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Initial findings indicate that semantic memory retrieval of different categories, such as fruits and animals, is variably impacted in Parkinson's disease (PD). Importantly, theories of embodied cognition propose that these variances may stem from compromised motor processing in PD patients. Indeed, the conceptual representation of the fruits category may involve aspects of manipulability and graspability, which are less relevant for the animals category. We aimed to assess semantic memory retrieval of fruits versus animals category as assessed by semantic fluency (SF) in PD by using the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative database.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study on 104 healthy controls (HC), 264 patients with sporadic de novo PD (S-PD), and 57 patients with genetic PD (G-PD). Additionally, we carried out explorative analysis concerning possible differences between S-PD and G-PF on SF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found lower fruits SF performance in PD (S-PD plus G-PD) compared to HC; however, this score could not classify the two groups. Crucially, no difference for the animals class was found. When analyzing separately S-PD and G-PD, we found that fruits SF in S-PD was lower compared to HC and was negatively associated with S-PD diagnosis. Remarkably, no difference for the animals class was found. We did not find significant SF differences in the G-PD. Moreover, SF scores, regardless of the category, were uncorrelated with dopamine integrity measures and motor symptoms scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings reveal distinct patterns of category dissociation in S-PD and G-PD, suggesting a potential link between category dissociation and motor embodiment processes in PD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"610-618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Initial findings indicate that semantic memory retrieval of different categories, such as fruits and animals, is variably impacted in Parkinson's disease (PD). Importantly, theories of embodied cognition propose that these variances may stem from compromised motor processing in PD patients. Indeed, the conceptual representation of the fruits category may involve aspects of manipulability and graspability, which are less relevant for the animals category. We aimed to assess semantic memory retrieval of fruits versus animals category as assessed by semantic fluency (SF) in PD by using the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative database.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 104 healthy controls (HC), 264 patients with sporadic de novo PD (S-PD), and 57 patients with genetic PD (G-PD). Additionally, we carried out explorative analysis concerning possible differences between S-PD and G-PF on SF.

Results: We found lower fruits SF performance in PD (S-PD plus G-PD) compared to HC; however, this score could not classify the two groups. Crucially, no difference for the animals class was found. When analyzing separately S-PD and G-PD, we found that fruits SF in S-PD was lower compared to HC and was negatively associated with S-PD diagnosis. Remarkably, no difference for the animals class was found. We did not find significant SF differences in the G-PD. Moreover, SF scores, regardless of the category, were uncorrelated with dopamine integrity measures and motor symptoms scales.

Conclusions: The findings reveal distinct patterns of category dissociation in S-PD and G-PD, suggesting a potential link between category dissociation and motor embodiment processes in PD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

帕金森病的具身概念:来自水果和动物语义流畅性障碍的见解。
目的:初步研究表明,帕金森病(PD)对不同类别(如水果和动物)的语义记忆检索有不同程度的影响。重要的是,具身认知理论提出,这些差异可能源于PD患者的运动加工受损。事实上,水果类别的概念表示可能涉及可操纵性和可抓性方面,这与动物类别不太相关。我们的目的是评估水果和动物类别的语义记忆检索,通过帕金森病进展标记倡议数据库评估语义流畅性(SF)。方法:我们对104名健康对照(HC)、264名散发性新发PD (S-PD)患者和57名遗传性PD (G-PD)患者进行了横断面研究。此外,我们还对S-PD和G-PF在SF上可能存在的差异进行了探索性分析。结果:我们发现,与HC相比,PD (S-PD + G-PD)中的水果SF性能较低;然而,这个分数不能区分两组。至关重要的是,在动物类中没有发现差异。在分别分析S-PD和G-PD时,我们发现S-PD的水果SF低于HC,并且与S-PD的诊断呈负相关。值得注意的是,动物类没有发现差异。我们未发现G-PD中SF有显著差异。此外,SF评分,无论类别,与多巴胺完整性测量和运动症状量表无关。结论:研究结果揭示了S-PD和G-PD中类别分离的不同模式,表明类别分离与PD的运动体现过程之间存在潜在的联系。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信