Enrico Battistella, Luca Pomba, Riccardo Toniato, Andrea Piotto, Antonio Toniato
{"title":"Total Thyroidectomy vs. Lobectomy in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Contested Gold Standard.","authors":"Enrico Battistella, Luca Pomba, Riccardo Toniato, Andrea Piotto, Antonio Toniato","doi":"10.3390/jpm15070324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), a subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma ≤ 1 cm in diameter, has shown a marked increase in incidence in recent decades, largely due to the widespread use of neck ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology. Despite its generally indolent course, optimal management of PTMC remains controversial, with treatment strategies ranging from active surveillance to total thyroidectomy. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study analyzes five years of experience at a single tertiary care center, including 130 patients diagnosed with PTMC following thyroid surgery between July 2018 and December 2023. Clinical, cytological, and pathological data were collected and analyzed to identify factors influencing surgical decision-making and postoperative outcomes. Patients underwent either total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy, with central and lateral lymph node dissection performed as indicated. Follow-up included clinical and biochemical surveillance for a mean duration of 3 years. <b>Results</b>: Total thyroidectomy was performed in 89.3% of patients, while hemithyroidectomy was limited to 10.7%. Multifocality was observed in 26.1% of cases, with bilateral involvement in 17.7%. Occult lymph node metastases were found in 14.6% (central compartment) and 3.8% (lateral neck). Postoperative radioactive iodine therapy was administered in 23.8% of patients. At final follow-up, 90.7% were disease-free. No significant predictors of recurrence or adverse outcomes were identified, though multifocality and lymph node involvement influenced surgical planning. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings support a risk-adapted surgical approach to PTMC, favoring total thyroidectomy in patients with suspicious or multifocal disease to avoid reoperation. While active surveillance and minimally invasive techniques are emerging, total thyroidectomy remains a safe and effective strategy in selected cases. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to further refine management guidelines for this increasingly common thyroid malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), a subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma ≤ 1 cm in diameter, has shown a marked increase in incidence in recent decades, largely due to the widespread use of neck ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology. Despite its generally indolent course, optimal management of PTMC remains controversial, with treatment strategies ranging from active surveillance to total thyroidectomy. Methods: This retrospective study analyzes five years of experience at a single tertiary care center, including 130 patients diagnosed with PTMC following thyroid surgery between July 2018 and December 2023. Clinical, cytological, and pathological data were collected and analyzed to identify factors influencing surgical decision-making and postoperative outcomes. Patients underwent either total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy, with central and lateral lymph node dissection performed as indicated. Follow-up included clinical and biochemical surveillance for a mean duration of 3 years. Results: Total thyroidectomy was performed in 89.3% of patients, while hemithyroidectomy was limited to 10.7%. Multifocality was observed in 26.1% of cases, with bilateral involvement in 17.7%. Occult lymph node metastases were found in 14.6% (central compartment) and 3.8% (lateral neck). Postoperative radioactive iodine therapy was administered in 23.8% of patients. At final follow-up, 90.7% were disease-free. No significant predictors of recurrence or adverse outcomes were identified, though multifocality and lymph node involvement influenced surgical planning. Conclusions: Our findings support a risk-adapted surgical approach to PTMC, favoring total thyroidectomy in patients with suspicious or multifocal disease to avoid reoperation. While active surveillance and minimally invasive techniques are emerging, total thyroidectomy remains a safe and effective strategy in selected cases. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to further refine management guidelines for this increasingly common thyroid malignancy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.