Impact of Intraoperative Descemet Membrane Perforations on Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Outcomes.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-07-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/4101770
Stephen Morgan, Ritika Mukhija, Mayank A Nanavaty
{"title":"Impact of Intraoperative Descemet Membrane Perforations on Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Outcomes.","authors":"Stephen Morgan, Ritika Mukhija, Mayank A Nanavaty","doi":"10.1155/joph/4101770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To analyse the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in cases with intraoperative Descemet membrane (DM) perforation. <b>Methods:</b> This is a literature review reporting outcomes of DALK with DM perforation. Studies where DALK was performed in the event of intraoperative DM perforation were included. Studies that did not separate analysis between those with and without DM perforation were excluded. The primary outcome was best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes were endothelial cell density (ECD), graft survival, rejection rates, double anterior chamber and conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Data from the included studies were collated to compare the outcomes of DALK with intraoperative DM perforation vs. DALK without DM perforation. <b>Results:</b> Eleven retrospective case series (357 eyes) were included. DM perforations were classified as micro- (<i>n</i> = 236) or macroperforations (<i>n</i> = 106). Mean weighted preoperative BCVA was 1.11 ± 0.36 logMAR and 1.13 ± 0.52 logMAR in perforation and nonperforation groups, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.53), improving to 0.35 ± 0.37 logMAR and 0.39 ± 0.07 logMAR at 12 months postoperatively (<i>p</i>=0.02). Graft rejection rates were 1.25% and 1.6% in the perforated and nonperforated groups, respectively, and primary graft failure rates were 4% and 3.74%, respectively. The mean postoperative ECD was 1662.41 ± 319.16 cells/mm<sup>2</sup> in the perforation group. Amongst those cases with DM perforation, double anterior chamber requiring rebubbling occurred in 22.4% of cases, and conversion to PK was 4.23%. <b>Conclusion:</b> DALK can achieve comparable long-term outcomes in the presence of DM perforation. Micro- and some macroperforations can often be managed without conversion to PK, with good long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4101770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/4101770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyse the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in cases with intraoperative Descemet membrane (DM) perforation. Methods: This is a literature review reporting outcomes of DALK with DM perforation. Studies where DALK was performed in the event of intraoperative DM perforation were included. Studies that did not separate analysis between those with and without DM perforation were excluded. The primary outcome was best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes were endothelial cell density (ECD), graft survival, rejection rates, double anterior chamber and conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Data from the included studies were collated to compare the outcomes of DALK with intraoperative DM perforation vs. DALK without DM perforation. Results: Eleven retrospective case series (357 eyes) were included. DM perforations were classified as micro- (n = 236) or macroperforations (n = 106). Mean weighted preoperative BCVA was 1.11 ± 0.36 logMAR and 1.13 ± 0.52 logMAR in perforation and nonperforation groups, respectively (p=0.53), improving to 0.35 ± 0.37 logMAR and 0.39 ± 0.07 logMAR at 12 months postoperatively (p=0.02). Graft rejection rates were 1.25% and 1.6% in the perforated and nonperforated groups, respectively, and primary graft failure rates were 4% and 3.74%, respectively. The mean postoperative ECD was 1662.41 ± 319.16 cells/mm2 in the perforation group. Amongst those cases with DM perforation, double anterior chamber requiring rebubbling occurred in 22.4% of cases, and conversion to PK was 4.23%. Conclusion: DALK can achieve comparable long-term outcomes in the presence of DM perforation. Micro- and some macroperforations can often be managed without conversion to PK, with good long-term outcomes.

术中网膜穿孔对深前板层角膜移植术效果的影响。
目的:分析深前板层角膜移植术(DALK)治疗术中糖尿病膜穿孔的疗效。方法:这是一篇文献综述,报告DALK合并DM穿孔的结果。包括术中DM穿孔时进行DALK的研究。没有单独分析糖尿病穿孔和非糖尿病穿孔的研究被排除在外。主要终点为最佳矫正距离视力(BCVA)。次要结果是内皮细胞密度(ECD)、移植物存活率、排异率、双前房和向穿透性角膜移植术(PK)的转化。对纳入研究的数据进行整理,比较术中有糖尿病穿孔的DALK与无糖尿病穿孔的DALK的结果。结果:纳入11个回顾性病例系列(357只眼)。DM穿孔分为微孔(n = 236)和大孔(n = 106)。穿孔组和非穿孔组术前加权BCVA平均值分别为1.11±0.36 logMAR和1.13±0.52 logMAR (p=0.53),术后12个月分别改善为0.35±0.37 logMAR和0.39±0.07 logMAR (p=0.02)。穿孔组和未穿孔组的排异率分别为1.25%和1.6%,初次移植失败率分别为4%和3.74%。穿孔组术后平均ECD为1662.41±319.16个细胞/mm2。在DM穿孔的病例中,双前房需要再泡的病例占22.4%,转化为PK的病例占4.23%。结论:DALK可以在DM穿孔的情况下达到相当的长期效果。微孔和一些大孔通常可以在不转化为PK的情况下进行管理,具有良好的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信