Patient education materials: improving readability to advance health equity.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Amos Grünebaum, Susan L Pollet, Renee McLeod-Sordjan, Gloria Bachman, Frank A Chervenak
{"title":"Patient education materials: improving readability to advance health equity.","authors":"Amos Grünebaum, Susan L Pollet, Renee McLeod-Sordjan, Gloria Bachman, Frank A Chervenak","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2025-0368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the readability of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) patient education pamphlets and evaluate changes over 25 years to determine their role as a social determinant of health affecting maternal health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of 134 English-language ACOG patient pamphlets using five validated readability metrics (Flesch Reading Ease Score, SMOG Index, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Bormuth Grade Placement). Materials were categorized into five groups: Pregnancy & Childbirth, Gynecologic Conditions, Other, Cancer & Screening, and Infections & STIs. A random subset of 20 pamphlets underwent quality assessment using the DISCERN tool. Results were compared with historical data from 1999.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DISCERN score was 65.6/75, indicating excellent content quality. However, readability analysis revealed concerning accessibility barriers. The mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 58.4 ± 6.2, with only 35.1 % of pamphlets meeting plain language standards (≥60 score, equivalent to 8th grade or below). Most materials (57.5 %) required 10th-12th grade reading ability. Across all readability metrics, the average grade level was 9.5, with only 2.2-6.7 % of pamphlets meeting recommended standards (≤8th grade). Comparison with 1999 data showed worsening readability, with scores increasing 1.0-3.7 grade levels across all metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACOG patient education materials consistently exceed recommended readability levels and have become more complex over 25 years. This inaccessibility perpetuates health disparities, particularly affecting marginalized populations with lower health literacy. Implementing plain language policies, AI-driven text simplification, and readability audits are essential for advancing maternal health equity and ensuring all patients can access comprehensible reproductive health information.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the readability of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) patient education pamphlets and evaluate changes over 25 years to determine their role as a social determinant of health affecting maternal health disparities.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis of 134 English-language ACOG patient pamphlets using five validated readability metrics (Flesch Reading Ease Score, SMOG Index, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Bormuth Grade Placement). Materials were categorized into five groups: Pregnancy & Childbirth, Gynecologic Conditions, Other, Cancer & Screening, and Infections & STIs. A random subset of 20 pamphlets underwent quality assessment using the DISCERN tool. Results were compared with historical data from 1999.

Results: The mean DISCERN score was 65.6/75, indicating excellent content quality. However, readability analysis revealed concerning accessibility barriers. The mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 58.4 ± 6.2, with only 35.1 % of pamphlets meeting plain language standards (≥60 score, equivalent to 8th grade or below). Most materials (57.5 %) required 10th-12th grade reading ability. Across all readability metrics, the average grade level was 9.5, with only 2.2-6.7 % of pamphlets meeting recommended standards (≤8th grade). Comparison with 1999 data showed worsening readability, with scores increasing 1.0-3.7 grade levels across all metrics.

Conclusions: ACOG patient education materials consistently exceed recommended readability levels and have become more complex over 25 years. This inaccessibility perpetuates health disparities, particularly affecting marginalized populations with lower health literacy. Implementing plain language policies, AI-driven text simplification, and readability audits are essential for advancing maternal health equity and ensuring all patients can access comprehensible reproductive health information.

患者教育材料:提高可读性,促进卫生公平。
目的:评估美国妇产科学院(ACOG)患者教育小册子的可读性,并评估25年来的变化,以确定其作为影响孕产妇健康差距的健康社会决定因素的作用。方法:使用五种有效的可读性指标(Flesch Reading Ease Score, SMOG Index, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index和Bormuth Grade Placement)对134份ACOG英语患者小册子进行横断面描述性分析。资料分为五组:妊娠与分娩、妇科状况、其他、癌症与筛查、感染与性传播感染。随机抽取20份小册子,使用DISCERN工具进行质量评估。结果与1999年以来的历史数据进行了比较。结果:平均DISCERN评分为65.6/75分,内容质量优良。然而,可读性分析揭示了可访问性障碍。平均Flesch Reading Ease评分为58.4±6.2分,只有35.1% %的小册子符合通俗语言标准(≥60分,相当于8年级或以下)。大多数材料(57.5 %)需要10 -12年级的阅读能力。在所有可读性指标中,平均等级水平为9.5,只有2.2-6.7 %的小册子达到推荐标准(≤8级)。与1999年的数据相比,可读性变差了,所有指标的得分都提高了1.0-3.7个等级。结论:25年来,ACOG患者教育材料一直超过推荐的可读性水平,并变得更加复杂。这种无法获得的情况使健康差距长期存在,尤其影响到卫生知识普及程度较低的边缘化人口。实施简明语言政策、人工智能驱动的文本简化和可读性审计对于促进孕产妇健康公平和确保所有患者都能获得可理解的生殖健康信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信